Literature DB >> 21732482

A nonhuman primate model for urinary bladder regeneration using autologous sources of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Arun K Sharma1, Matthew I Bury, Andrew J Marks, Natalie J Fuller, Jay W Meisner, Natalie Tapaskar, Lisa C Halliday, Derek J Matoka, Earl Y Cheng.   

Abstract

Animal models that have been used to examine the regenerative capacity of cell-seeded scaffolds in a urinary bladder augmentation model have ultimately translated poorly in the clinical setting. This may be due to a number of factors including cell types used for regeneration and anatomical/physiological differences between lower primate species and their human counterparts. We postulated that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could provide a cell source for partial bladder regeneration in a newly described nonhuman primate bladder (baboon) augmentation model. Cell-sorted CD105(+) /CD73(+) /CD34(-) /CD45(-) baboon MSCs transduced with green fluorescent protein (GFP) were seeded onto small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffolds. Baboons underwent an approximate 40%-50% cystectomy followed by augmentation cystoplasty with the aforementioned scaffolds or controls and finally enveloped with omentum. Bladders from sham, unseeded SIS, and MSC/SIS scaffolds were subjected to trichrome, H&E, and immunofluorescent staining 10 weeks postaugmentation. Immunofluorescence staining for muscle markers combined with an anti-GFP antibody revealed that >90% of the cells were GFP(+) /muscle marker(+) and >70% were GFP(+) /Ki-67(+) demonstrating grafted cells were present and actively proliferating within the grafted region. Trichrome staining of MSC/SIS-augmented bladders exhibited typical bladder architecture and quantitative morphometry analyses revealed an approximate 32% and 52% muscle to collagen ratio in unseeded versus seeded animals, respectively. H&E staining revealed a lack of infiltration of inflammatory cells in grafted animals and in corresponding kidneys and ureters. Simple cystometry indicated recovery between 28% and 40% of native bladder capacity. Data demonstrate MSC/SIS composites support regeneration of bladder tissue and validate this new bladder augmentation model.
Copyright © 2010 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21732482     DOI: 10.1002/stem.568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  40 in total

Review 1.  [Stem cell therapy and tissue engineering in regenerative urology].

Authors:  M Vaegler; B Amend; W Aicher; A Stenzl; K-D Sievert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Regenerative medicine based applications to combat stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Hatim Thaker; Arun K Sharma
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 3.  The endometrium as a source of mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Levent Mutlu; Demetra Hufnagel; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 4.  Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell therapy for voiding dysfunction.

Authors:  Alice Yu; Lysanne Campeau
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Production of urothelium from pluripotent stem cells for regenerative applications.

Authors:  Stephanie L Osborn; Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  A Gingiva-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Laden Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Extracellular Matrix Construct Promotes Myomucosal Regeneration of the Tongue.

Authors:  Qilin Xu; Rabie M Shanti; Qunzhou Zhang; Steven B Cannady; Bert W O'Malley; Anh D Le
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  The promotion of functional urinary bladder regeneration using anti-inflammatory nanofibers.

Authors:  Matthew I Bury; Natalie J Fuller; Jay W Meisner; Matthias D Hofer; Matthew J Webber; Lesley W Chow; Sheba Prasad; Hatim Thaker; Xuan Yue; Vani S Menon; Edward C Diaz; Samuel I Stupp; Earl Y Cheng; Arun K Sharma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Bladder biomechanics and the use of scaffolds for regenerative medicine in the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ajalloueian; Greg Lemon; Jöns Hilborn; Ioannis S Chronakis; Magdalena Fossum
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  The effect of manipulation of silk scaffold fabrication parameters on matrix performance in a murine model of bladder augmentation.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Eun Seok Gil; Michael L Lovett; Danielle N Rockwood; Dolores Di Vizio; David L Kaplan; Rosalyn M Adam; Carlos R Estrada; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Tissue engineering for the oncologic urinary bladder.

Authors:  Tomasz Drewa; Jan Adamowicz; Arun Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.