Literature DB >> 15008741

A surgical model of composite cystoplasty with cultured urothelial cells: a controlled study of gross outcome and urothelial phenotype.

M Fraser1, D F Thomas, E Pitt, P Harnden, L K Trejdosiewicz, J Southgate.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the outcome of composite cystoplasty using cultured urothelial cells combined with de-epithelialized colon or uterus in a porcine surgical model, using appropriate controls, and to characterize the neo-epithelium created by composite cystoplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urothelial cells were isolated and propagated in vitro from open bladder biopsies taken from nine female minipigs. Cohesive sheets of confluent urothelial cells were transferred to polyglactin carrier meshes and sutured to de-epithelialized autologous colon in four animals and de-epithelialized autologous uterus in five. These composite segments were then used for augmentation cystoplasty. Conventional colocystoplasty, de-epithelialized colocystoplasty and sham operations were carried out in six control animals. After killing the animals at approximately 90 days the bladders were removed for examination and immunohistochemical analysis, using a panel of antibodies against cytokeratins and urothelial differentiation-associated antigens.
RESULTS: Macroscopically, the bladders augmented with composite segments derived from uterine muscle had no evidence of shrinkage or contracture. Histological analysis showed that in four of five composite uterocystoplasties, the neo-urothelium was stratified and had a transitional morphology, although in some areas coverage was incomplete. Immunohistochemical analysis showed evidence of squamous differentiation in both native and augmented segments. All composite and de-epithelialized colonic segments showed significant contraction with poor urothelial coverage, reflecting the unsuitability of the thin-walled porcine colon for de-epithelialization.
CONCLUSIONS: The functional and macroscopic outcome of bladder augmentation with a composite derived from cultured urothelium and de-epithelialized smooth muscle of uterine origin endorses the feasibility of composite cystoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15008741     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04675.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

Review 1.  [In vitro stratified urothelium and its relevance in reconstructive urology].

Authors:  S Maurer; G Feil; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Bioartificial urothelium generated from bladder washings. A future therapeutic option for reconstructive surgery].

Authors:  G Feil; S Maurer; U Nagele; K-D Sievert; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  How to isolate urothelial cells? Comparison of four different methods and literature review.

Authors:  T Kloskowski; M Uzarska; N Gurtowska; J Olkowska; R Joachimiak; A Bajek; M Gagat; A Grzanka; M Bodnar; A Marszałek; T Drewa
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 4.  Update on tissue engineering in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Blake W Palmer; Bradley P Kropp
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into bladder cells: potential for urological tissue engineering.

Authors:  Hong Tian; Shantaram Bharadwaj; Yan Liu; Peter X Ma; Anthony Atala; Yuanyuan Zhang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Dynamic reciprocity in cell-scaffold interactions.

Authors:  Joshua R Mauney; Rosalyn M Adam
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  What is the current role of intracavernosal injection in management of erectile dysfunction?

Authors:  A I El-Sakka
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Biocompatibility of different nanostructured TiO2 scaffolds and their potential for urologic applications.

Authors:  Roghayeh Imani; Meysam Pazoki; Daša Zupančič; Mateja Erdani Kreft; Veronika Kralj-Iglič; Peter Veranič; Aleš Iglič
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.356

9.  Transplantation of autologous differentiated urothelium in an experimental model of composite cystoplasty.

Authors:  Alex Turner; Ramnath Subramanian; David F M Thomas; Jennifer Hinley; Syed Khawar Abbas; Jens Stahlschmidt; Jennifer Southgate
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Seromuscular grafts for bladder reconstruction: extra-luminal demucosalisation of the bowel.

Authors:  Ramnath Subramaniam; Alexander M Turner; S Khawar Abbas; David F M Thomas; Jennifer Southgate
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.