Literature DB >> 30685318

A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics.

Richard T Meenan1, Gloria D Coronado2, Amanda Petrik2, Beverly B Green3.   

Abstract

STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program within eight federally-qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Oregon and California promoting fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) with appropriate colonoscopy follow-up. Results are presented of a cost-effectiveness analysis of STOP CRC. Organization staff completed activity-based costing spreadsheets, assigning labor hours by intervention activity and job-specific wage rates. Non-labor costs were from study data. Data were collected over February 2014-February 2016; analyses were performed in 2016-2017. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using completed FITs adjusted for number of screening-eligible patients (SEPs), as the effectiveness measure were calculated overall and by organization. Intervention delivery costs totaled $305 K across eight organizations (range: $10.2 K-$110 K). Overall delivery cost per SEP was $14.43 (range: $10.37-$19.10). The largest cost category across organizations was implementation, specifically mailing preparation. The overall ICER was $483 per SEP-adjusted completed FIT (range: $96-$1021 among organizations with positive effectiveness). Lagged data accounting for implementation delay produced comparable results. The costs of colonoscopies following abnormal FITs decreased the overall ICER to S409 because usual care clinics generated more such colonoscopies than intervention clinics. Using lagged data, follow-up colonoscopies increase the ICER by 4.3% to $460. Results indicate the complex implications for cost-effectiveness of implementing standard CRC screening within a pragmatic setting involving FQHCs with varied patient populations, clinical structures, and resources. Performance variation across organizations emphasizes the need for future evaluations that inform the introduction of efficient CRC screening to underserved populations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Colon cancer; Cost analysis; Cost effectiveness analysis; Prevention & control

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30685318      PMCID: PMC6392039          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  31 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Calvin Franz; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an application of Fieller's theorem.

Authors:  A R Willan; B J O'Brien
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice.

Authors:  Richard T Meenan; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Sally W Vernon; Sharon Fuller; Ching-Yun Wang; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jen Sanchez; Amanda Petrik; Tanya Kapka; Jen DeVoe; Beverly Green
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C Dolan; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Terry C Davis; Nicolle Gorby; Lisa Ladewski; Dachao Liu; Alfred W Rademaker; Franklin Medio; Brian P Schmitt; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Clinical costs of colorectal cancer screening in 5 federally funded demonstration programs.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Maggie C Beebe; Sonja Hoover; Janet Royalty; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Amanda F Petrik; William M Vollmer; Stephen H Taplin; Erin M Keast; Scott Fields; Beverly B Green
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Cost Effectiveness of Age-Specific Screening Intervals for People With Family Histories of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Steffie K Naber; Karen M Kuntz; Nora B Henrikson; Marc S Williams; Ned Calonge; Katrina A B Goddard; Doris T Zallen; Theodore G Ganiats; Elizabeth M Webber; A Cecile J W Janssens; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Eric S Johnson; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David Smith; Raj Mummadi; Amanda F Petrik; Jamie H Thompson; Ricardo Jimenez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Brennan Lanier; Nicole Kluz; Victoria Valencia; Patrick Chang; Todd Olmstead
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Source matters: a survey of cost variation for fecal immunochemical tests in primary care.

Authors:  Jennifer Coury; Katrina Ramsey; Rose Gunn; Jon Judkins; Melinda Davis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Colorectal cancer surveillance by colonoscopy in a prospective, population-based long-term Swiss screening study - outcomes, adherence, and costs.

Authors:  Armin Zgraggen; Sandro Tiziano Stoffel; Michaela Carla Barbier; Urs Albert Marbet
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.769

5.  Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Tong Han Chung; Danmeng Huang; Timothy E Stump; Patrick O Monahan; Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.