Literature DB >> 30080725

Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair: A Decade Long Prospective Observational Study With Analysis of 1023 Patient Outcomes.

B Todd Heniford1, Samuel W Ross, Blair A Wormer, Amanda L Walters, Amy E Lincourt, Paul D Colavita, Kent W Kercher, Vedra A Augenstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of over a decade's experience utilizing preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (PP-VHR).
BACKGROUND: PP-VHR was first described by our group in 2006, and there have been no subsequent reports of outcomes with this technique.
METHODS: A prospective study of all PP-VHR from January, 2004 to April, 2016 was performed. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazard models were used to identify predictors of wound complications and hernia recurrence, respectively.
RESULTS: There were 1023 PP-VHRs. Mean age was 57.2 ± 12.6 years, BMI 33.7 ± 11.4 kg/m, defect size 210.0 ± 221.4 cm; 23.7% had diabetes, 13.9% were smokers, 68.7% were recurrent, and 23.6% incarcerated. Component separation was required in 43.6%, and a panniculectomy was performed in 30.0%. Wound complication was present in 27.3% of patients, with 1.7% having a mesh infection. In all, there were 53 (5.2%) hernia recurrences and 36 (3.9%) in the synthetic repairs, with a mean follow-up of 27.0 ± 26.4 months. On multivariate regression (odds ratio or hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval), diabetes (1.9, 1.4-3.0), panniculectomy (2.6, 1.8-3.9), and operations requiring biologic mesh were predictors of wound complications, whereas recurrent hernia repair (2.69, 1.14-6.35), biologic mesh (3.1, 1.67-5.75), and wound complications (3.01, 1.69-5.39) were predictors of hernia recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: An open PP-VHR is a very effective means to repair large, complex, and recurrent hernias resulting in a low recurrence rate. Mesh choice in VHR is important and was associated with hernia recurrence and wound complications in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30080725     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  The impact of component separation technique versus no component separation technique on complications and quality of life in the repair of large ventral hernias.

Authors:  Sean R Maloney; Kathryn A Schlosser; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Katzen; Sullivan A Ayuso; Jana Sacco; Dau Ku; Gregory T Scarola; Kent W Kercher; Paul D Colavita; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Analyzing material changes consistent with degradation of explanted polymeric hernia mesh related to clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Xinyue Lu; Melinda Harman; B Todd Heniford; Vedra Augenstein; Brittney McIver; William Bridges
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Impact of perforator sparing on anterior component separation outcomes in open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Sharbel A Elhage; Matthew N Marturano; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Management of epigastric, umbilical, spigelian and small incisional hernia as a day case procedure: results of long-term follow-up after open preperitoneal flat mesh technique.

Authors:  M Zuvela; D Galun; A Bogdanovic; N Bidzic; M Zivanovic; M Zuvela; M Zuvela
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Are laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs truly comparable?: A propensity-matched study in large ventral hernias.

Authors:  Jenny M Shao; Eva B Deerenberg; Sharbel A Elhage; Paul D Colavita; Tanu Prasad; Vedra A Augenstein; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  S A Ayuso; J M Shao; E B Deerenberg; S A Elhage; M B George; B T Heniford; V A Augenstein
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissues following complex, contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): a propensity-matched study.

Authors:  Sullivan A Ayuso; Sharbel A Elhage; Bola G Aladegbami; Angela M Kao; Kent W Kercher; Paul D Colavita; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.

Authors:  David J Samson; Mahir Gachabayov; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Impact of panniculectomy in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity matched analysis in 624 patients.

Authors:  Sharbel A Elhage; Matthew N Marturano; Eva B Deerenberg; Jenny M Shao; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.