Literature DB >> 34018046

Delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissues following complex, contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): a propensity-matched study.

Sullivan A Ayuso1, Sharbel A Elhage1, Bola G Aladegbami1, Angela M Kao1, Kent W Kercher1, Paul D Colavita1, Vedra A Augenstein1, B Todd Heniford2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wound complications following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in a contaminated setting are common and significantly increase the risk of hernia recurrence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of short-term negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) followed by operative delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissue after AWR in a contaminated setting.
METHODS: A prospective institutional hernia database was queried for patients who underwent NPWT-assisted DPC after contaminated AWR between 2008 and 2020. Primary outcomes included wound complication rate and reopening of the incision. A non-DPC group was created using propensity-matching. Standard descriptive statistics were used, and a univariate analysis was performed between the DPC and non-DPC groups.
RESULTS: In total, 110 patients underwent DPC following AWR. The hernias were on average large (188 ± 133.6 cm2), often recurrent (81.5%), and 60.5% required a components separation. All patients had CDC Class 3 (14.5%) or 4 (85.5%) wounds and biologic mesh placed. Using CeDAR, the wound complication rate was estimated to be 66.3%. Postoperatively, 26.4% patients developed a wound complication, but only 5.5% patients required reopening of the wound. The rate of recurrence was 5.5% with mean follow-up of 22.6 ± 27.1 months. After propensity-matching, there were 73 patients each in the DPC and non-DPC groups. DPC patients had fewer overall wound complications (23.0% vs 43.9%, p = 0.02). While 4.1% of the DPC group required reopening of the incision, 20.5% of patients in the non-DPC required reopening of the incision (p = 0.005) with an average time to healing of 150 days. Hernia recurrence remained low overall (2.7% vs 5.4%, p = 0.17).
CONCLUSIONS: DPC can be performed with a high rate of success in complex, contaminated AWR patients by reducing the rate of wound complications and avoiding prolonged healing times. In patients undergoing AWR in a contaminated setting, a NPWT-assisted DPC should be considered.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal wall reconstruction; Complication; Contaminated; Delayed primary closure; Hernia; Infection; Negative pressure wound therapy; Surgical site occurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34018046     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08485-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  DELAYED PRIMARY SUTURE OF WOUNDS.

Authors:  H H Hepburn
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1919-02-15

Review 2.  Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions.

Authors:  Aneel Bhangu; Prashant Singh; Jonathan Lundy; Douglas M Bowley
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  The use of component separation during abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated fields: A case-control analysis.

Authors:  Sean R Maloney; Vedra A Augenstein; Erling Oma; Kathryn A Schlosser; Tanushree Prasad; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; Paul D Colavita; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds.

Authors:  S M Cohn; G Giannotti; A W Ong; J E Varela; D V Shatz; M G McKenney; D Sleeman; E Ginzburg; J S Augenstein; P M Byers; L R Sands; M D Hellinger; N Namias
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research.

Authors:  B K Poulose; J Shelton; S Phillips; D Moore; W Nealon; D Penson; W Beck; M D Holzman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; David M Krpata; Bridget Ermlich; Jeffrey A Blatnik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Outcomes of simultaneous large complex abdominal wall reconstruction and enterocutaneous fistula takedown.

Authors:  David M Krpata; Sharon L Stein; Michelle Eston; Bridget Ermlich; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Joel J Bauer; Marco Harmaty; Alfredo M Carbonell; William S Cobb; Brent Matthews; Matthew I Goldblatt; Don J Selzer; Benjamin K Poulose; Bibi M E Hansson; Camiel Rosman; James J Chao; Garth R Jacobsen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Comparison of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Versus Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Boonying Siribumrungwong; Anuwat Chantip; Pinit Noorit; Chumpon Wilasrusmee; Winai Ungpinitpong; Pradya Chotiya; Borwornsom Leerapan; Patarawan Woratanarat; Mark McEvoy; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair.

Authors:  F E E de Vries; J J Atema; O Lapid; M C Obdeijn; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Katzen; Sullivan A Ayuso; Jana Sacco; Dau Ku; Gregory T Scarola; Kent W Kercher; Paul D Colavita; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.