Bioorthogonal reactions are selective transformations that are not affected by any biological functional group and are widely used for chemical modification of biomolecules. Recently, we reported that vinylboronic acids (VBAs) gave exceptionally high reaction rates in the bioorthogonal inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (iEDDA) reaction with tetrazines bearing a boron-coordinating pyridyl moiety compared to tetrazines lacking such a substituent. In this integrated experimental and theoretical study, we show how the reaction rate of the VBA-tetrazine ligation can be accelerated by shifting the equilibrium from boronic acid to the boronate anion in the reaction mixture. Quantum chemical activation strain analyses reveal that this rate enhancement is a direct consequence of the excellent electron-donating capability of the boronate anion in which the π HOMO is pushed to a higher energy due to the net negative potential of this species. We have explored the second-order rate constants of several tetrazines containing potential VBA-coordinating hydroxyl substituents. We observed an increase in rate constants of several orders of magnitude compared to the tetrazines lacking a hydroxyl substituent. Furthermore, we find the hydroxyl-substituted tetrazines to be more selective toward VBAs than toward the commonly used bioorthogonal reactant norbornene, and more stable in aqueous environment than the previously studied tetrazines containing a pyridyl substituent.
Bioorthogonal reactions are selective transformations that are not affected by any biological functional group and are widely used for chemical modification of biomolecules. Recently, we reported that vinylboronic acids (VBAs) gave exceptionally high reaction rates in the bioorthogonal inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (iEDDA) reaction with tetrazines bearing a boron-coordinating pyridyl moiety compared to tetrazines lacking such a substituent. In this integrated experimental and theoretical study, we show how the reaction rate of the VBA-tetrazine ligation can be accelerated by shifting the equilibrium from boronic acid to the boronate anion in the reaction mixture. Quantum chemical activation strain analyses reveal that this rate enhancement is a direct consequence of the excellent electron-donating capability of the boronate anion in which the π HOMO is pushed to a higher energy due to the net negative potential of this species. We have explored the second-order rate constants of several tetrazines containing potential VBA-coordinating hydroxyl substituents. We observed an increase in rate constants of several orders of magnitude compared to the tetrazines lacking a hydroxyl substituent. Furthermore, we find the hydroxyl-substituted tetrazines to be more selective toward VBAs than toward the commonly used bioorthogonal reactant norbornene, and more stable in aqueous environment than the previously studied tetrazines containing a pyridyl substituent.
The development of
bioorthogonal reactions has advanced tremendously
as it allows selective modification of biomolecules without interfering
with any naturally occurring biochemical functionality.[1−4] The tetrazine ligation is one of the most popular bioorthogonal
reactions due to its selectivity and high reaction rates.[5−8] So far, several bioorthogonal reactants have been developed for
this inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder (iEDDA) reaction,
such as strained alkynes (e.g., bicyclo[6.1.0]nonyne (BCN)),[9,10] strained alkenes (e.g., trans-cyclooctene (TCO),[11,12] norbornene,[13] and cyclopropene),[14,15] and nonstrained alkenes (e.g., primary alkenes).[16,17] During our efforts to improve the reaction rates of the slow-reacting
nonstrained alkenes, we found that vinylboronic acids (VBAs) show
impressive second-order rate constants (k2) with 3,6-dipyridiyl-s-tetrazines of up to 27 M–1 s–1 in 5% MeOH/PBS (pH = 7.4).[18] The VBAs are easily accessible, biocompatible
with cellular components, and suitable for protein modification. Recently,
we showed that vinylboronic acids are also suitable for a bioorthogonal
application within the living cell.[19]Boronic acids possess a vacant p orbital and are mild organic Lewis
acids that form the more electron-rich boronate complex after coordination
by a Lewis base. In aqueous media, the boronic acids are in equilibrium
with their negatively chargedboronate anion, although the VBAs have
high pKa values and therefore reside mainly
in the trivalent boronic acid form at physiological pH (pH = 7.4)
(Figure A).[20] Recently, we reported that VBAs are much more
reactive toward pyridyl-substituted tetrazines than toward tetrazines
lacking this Lewis basic substituent (Figure B).[18,21] We observed that the
high reaction rates are caused by coordination of the nitrogen of
the pyridyl ring to the boron of the VBA, which favors the reaction
due to the induced proximity and the inductive effect. We used this
unique reactivity of the VBA to develop two orthogonal tetrazine ligations
and perform a simultaneous dual labeling of two proteins containing
a VBA and a norbornene moiety.[21]
Figure 1
(A) Equilibrium
between boronic acid 1a and boronate
anion 1b in aqueous environment. (B) Coordination of
the nitrogen of the pyridyl ring of tetrazine 2a to the
boronic acid of VBA 1, yielding dihydropyridazine 3 as a single isomer.
(A) Equilibrium
between boronic acid 1a and boronate
anion 1b in aqueous environment. (B) Coordination of
the nitrogen of the pyridyl ring of tetrazine 2a to the
boronic acid of VBA 1, yielding dihydropyridazine 3 as a single isomer.Herein, we explore the reactivity of the boronic acids and
their
tetravalent boronate counterparts toward tetrazines in more detail
in a combined theoretical and experimental study, based on density
functional theory (DFT) and rate measurements as a function of pH.
In addition, we discuss the reactivity of a set of tetrazines bearing
conceivable boron-coordinating hydroxyl substituents. We hypothesized
that the hydroxyl moiety would favor coordination to the VBA and increase
the rate constants of the tetrazine-VBA ligation. Furthermore, we
anticipate that orthogonality of these tetrazines toward VBAs could
be established as more electron-rich tetrazines react less favorably
in the general iEDDA reaction with unsubstituted (strained) alkenes.
Results
and Discussion
DFT Calculations of the Tetrazine Ligation
with VBAs
To provide more insight into the reactivity of
the VBA and the boronate
anion in the iEDDA reaction with tetrazines, we have explored suitable
model reactions using DFT calculations as implemented in the Amsterdam
Density Functional (ADF) 2013 software.[22] For all calculations, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)
was used at the OLYP level.[23−25] As a basis set, the TZ2P level
was used.[22] Vibrational analyses confirmed
zero imaginary frequencies for equilibrium structures and a single
imaginary frequency associated with normal mode along the reaction
coordinate for transition states.We first determined the optimized
geometries, reaction energies, and transition states of the reaction
of vinylboronic acid 6a with tetrazine 2b which bears no substituents and cannot coordinate to the boronic
acid of the VBA, until the transition state (TS) (Table ). We compare this reaction
to the tetrazine ligations with a nonsubstituted alkene, ethene 4, and with an alkene containing an electron-donating substituent,
methylvinylether 5. The tetrazine ligation involving
methylvinylether 5 has a transition state barrier (ΔETS) that is comparable to that for ethene 4, although both have a lower ΔETS than VBA 6a (Table ). Also, the reaction energy (Er) with ethene 4 is more favorable than with
VBA 6a, although all reactions are pronouncedly exothermic,
with values of −17, −8.0, and −12.8 kcal mol–1 for 4, 5, and 6a, respectively.
Table 1
Quantum-Chemically Computed Key Parameters
of the Ligation of Tetrazine 2b with Alkenes 4–6a
Computed at OLYP/TZ2P. Reaction
energy (Er) and change in transition state
(ΔETS), interaction (ΔEint), and strain energies (ΔEstrain) in kcal mol–1 with ΔETS = ΔEstrain – ΔEint. HOMO and LUMO
energies in eV. [a] Energy of the HOMO–2, which is the occupied
π orbital.
Computed at OLYP/TZ2P. Reaction
energy (Er) and change in transition state
(ΔETS), interaction (ΔEint), and strain energies (ΔEstrain) in kcal mol–1 with ΔETS = ΔEstrain – ΔEint. HOMO and LUMO
energies in eV. [a] Energy of the HOMO–2, which is the occupied
π orbital.Next, we
compared the tetrazine ligations of tetrazine 2b with
vinylboronic acid 6a and the tetracoordinated
boronate anion 6b (Table ). Both ΔETS and Er are much lower for boronate 6b than for boronic acid 6a, with ΔETS + 1.6 kcal mol–1 and Er of −29.1 kcal mol–1 for 6b, and only ΔETS of +18.2
kcal mol–1 and Er of
−12.8 kcal mol–1 for 6a.To trace the origin of the enhanced reactivity of 6b relative to 6a, we have carried out activation-strain
analyses (also known as distortion/interaction analyses),[26] in combination with an analysis of the bonding
mechanism between the reactants in the TS based on Kohn–Sham
MO theory.[27] The lower barrier for the
boronate anion compared to vinylboronic acid reacting with tetrazine
is mainly caused by a more stabilizing interaction energy ΔEint in the case of the former. Next, we analyzed
the orbital electronic structure of the alkenes 4–6 and tetrazine 2b (Tables and S3). Figure is a schematic representation
of the frontier molecular orbital interactions between VBA 6a and its boronate anion 6b with the tetrazine as they
emerge from our quantitative Kohn–Sham MO analyses. The dominant
bonding mechanism is a donor–acceptor orbital interaction between
the occupied C–C π bonding orbital of the alkene and
the LUMO+1 acceptor orbital of tetrazine 2b. In the case
of vinylboronic acid 6a, the electron-donating π
orbital is the HOMO whereas for vinylboronate 6b, it
is the HOMO–2.
Figure 2
Frontier orbital interactions in the tetrazine ligation.
Schematic
representation of the frontier molecular orbital interactions of 1,2,4,5-tetrazine 2b and vinylboronic acid 6a (black) or vinylboronate 6b (red) from our quantitative Kohn–Sham MO analyses.
Frontier orbital interactions in the tetrazine ligation.
Schematic
representation of the frontier molecular orbital interactions of 1,2,4,5-tetrazine 2b and vinylboronic acid 6a (black) or vinylboronate 6b (red) from our quantitative Kohn–Sham MO analyses.Our analyses reveal that the π
orbital in boronate 6b is at higher orbital energy than
that in boronic acid 6a, because of the more negative
potential in the former,
anionic reactant. Consequently, the orbital-energy gap with the tetrazine
acceptor orbital is smaller and the interaction ΔEint more stabilizing for the boronate anion 6b than for its boronic acid analogue 6a. Eventually,
as pointed out above, this leads to the lower barrier for the reaction
involving 6b. Alkenes 4 and 5 have a similar or slightly higher HOMO than vinylboronic acid 6a (Table ). Therefore, 4 and 5 should also undergo
an iEDDA reaction with tetrazine 2b (vide infra). Our
quantum chemical results agree with our previous finding[21] that only tetrazines bearing the pyridyl substituent
gave high rate constants with VBAs compared to tetrazines lacking
a Lewis basic substituent.
pH Effect on the Tetrazine Ligation with
VBAs
Next,
we investigated whether the lower reaction energy of the boronate
anion toward tetrazines could be validated in an experimental setup
(Figure A). As formation
with the boronate anion is favored upon increasing pH, we expected
that this would also advance the tetrazine ligation. We examined the
reaction of (E)-phenylvinylboronic acid 1 with 3-phenyl-s-tetrazine 2c, lacking
a boron-coordinating atom, between pH 8 and 11. Indeed, the rate of
the reaction of VBA 1 with tetrazine 2c increased
at higher pH, indicating that the boronate anion is more reactive
than the boronic acid, in accordance with the DFT calculations (Figure B). As a control
experiment, we examined the reaction of tetrazine 2c with
norbornene 5 in the same buffers and observed that the
rate is independent of the pH, as expected. In the absence of an alkene,
tetrazine 2c slowly degrades, especially in the basic
aqueous solutions (Figure S1).
Figure 3
(A) Schematic
overview of the pH effect on the reaction of tetrazine 2c with VBA 1 yielding dihydropyridazine 7. (B) Reactions of tetrazine 2c with VBA 1 (left) and norbornene 8 (right) in 50% MeOH
and 50% Na2B4O7 buffer, ranging from
pH 8 until 11. The reactions were measured at 20 °C by following
the decay of the tetrazine at 540 nm. [a] Endo/exo 2:1.
(A) Schematic
overview of the pH effect on the reaction of tetrazine 2c with VBA 1 yielding dihydropyridazine 7. (B) Reactions of tetrazine 2c with VBA 1 (left) and norbornene 8 (right) in 50% MeOH
and 50% Na2B4O7 buffer, ranging from
pH 8 until 11. The reactions were measured at 20 °C by following
the decay of the tetrazine at 540 nm. [a] Endo/exo 2:1.
Second-Order Rate Constants
of VBAs with Tetrazines Bearing
a Hydroxyl-Substituent
As we established that the tetrazine
ligation proceeds faster when the VBA adopts the boronate anion configuration,
we next explored the reactivity of a set of tetrazines bearing hydroxyl
substituents. The coordination of the hydroxyl to the VBA could at
physiological pH promote the rate of the iEDDA reaction by making
the VBA more reactive and favor the cycloaddition due to the induced
proximity. In addition, as the tested hydroxyl substituents are more
electron-rich than the pyridine substituent, we expect that the hydroxyl-tetrazines
react less favorably in the iEDDA reaction with unsubstituted alkenes,
such as norbornene, and thereby become more selective for reaction
with VBAs.We synthesized several tetrazines possessing a hydroxyl
substituent, and compared the k2 values
of the tetrazine ligations of VBA 1 with that of norbornene 8 (Figure , Table S1). As previously shown, VBA 1 and norbornene 8 have a comparable rate constant
of 1.4 M–1 s–1 with dipyridyl-s-tetrazine 2a in 50% MeOH/PBS at 20 °C.[18] Methyl pyridyl tetrazine 2e still
possesses a boron-coordinating atom, although a 10-fold lower k2 value was found for VBA 1 than
for norbornene 8. Phenyl tetrazine 2c also
showed a lower rate constant for VBA 1 than for norbornene 8. Phenyl methyl tetrazine 2h, the derivative
of 2e lacking a coordination atom, gives a 100-fold lower
rate constant for VBA 1 than for norbornene 8. Of note, we have previously observed that pyrimidine tetrazines 2f and 2g also react poorly with VBAs, which
we reasonably ascribe to the lower basicity of the pyrimidine compared
to the pyridine substituent.[21]
Figure 4
(A) Second-order
rate constants of tetrazines 2a,c–n with VBA 1 and norbornene 8 measured
in 1:1 MeOH/PBS (pH = 7.4) at 20 °C, shown
on a logarithmic scale. (B) Product formation of the reaction of tetrazine 2l with VBA 1 and subsequent oxidation with chloranil,
yielding pyridazine 9 as a single isomer. [a] Previously
reported.[18] [b] Previously reported.[21] [c] Endo/exo = 2:1.
(A) Second-order
rate constants of tetrazines 2a,c–n with VBA 1 and norbornene 8 measured
in 1:1 MeOH/PBS (pH = 7.4) at 20 °C, shown
on a logarithmic scale. (B) Product formation of the reaction of tetrazine 2l with VBA 1 and subsequent oxidation with chloranil,
yielding pyridazine 9 as a single isomer. [a] Previously
reported.[18] [b] Previously reported.[21] [c] Endo/exo = 2:1.Introducing an aliphatic hydroxyl
substituent, as in tetrazine 2i, resulted in a tremendous
increase in reaction rate compared
to the nonhydroxyl-containing tetrazine 2h, giving a k2 value of VBA 1 with 2i that is almost 500-fold higher than with 2h. The rate
constant of norbornene 8 with tetrazine 2i slightly dropped compared to the constant with 2h and
was 10-fold lower than the k2 of 2i with VBA, demonstrating that this hydroxylated tetrazine
is more selective toward vinylboronic acids. The reaction of VBA 1 with disubstituted hydroxyethyl-substituted tetrazine 2j and the hydroxyethyl-methyl-substituted tetrazine 2k showed lower rate constants than with tetrazine 2i, possibly due to lack of an aromatic substituent on the tetrazine
for stacking. Norbornene 8 gave a slightly lower k2 value with both tetrazines 2j and 2k compared to the more electron deficient tetrazine 2e, as expected.Next, we investigated tetrazines bearing
a hydroxyl substituent
on the phenyl ring in the reaction with VBA and norbornene. The o-hydroxyphenyl methyl tetrazine 2l gave a
high rate constant of 0.28 M–1 s–1 for VBA 1, almost 1000-fold higher than the k2 of phenyl methyl tetrazine 2h. Moreover, the reactivity of 2l with norbornene 8 was 23-fold lower, making this tetrazine more selective
for VBA. In contrast, m-hydroxyphenyl tetrazine 2m gave a more than 3 orders of magnitude decrease in reaction
rate compared to the o-hydroxy-substituted 2l, possibly due to unfavorable positioning of the hydroxyl
for coordination. Important to emphasize is that the hydroxyl substitution
pattern is not relevant for the tetrazine ligations with norbornene,
as m-hydroxy-substituted tetrazine 2m gave a comparable rate constant as the o-hydroxy-substituted
tetrazine 2l. Furthermore, o-hydroxyphenyl
pyridyl tetrazine 2m additionally increased the reaction
rate more than 30-fold to 9.3 M–1 s–1 for VBA and thereby exceeding the rate constant of dipyridyl-s-tetrazine 2a with about 1 order of magnitude.
We additionally attempted to synthesize and measure the rate constants
for disubstituted o-hydroxyphenyl tetrazine; however,
the insolubility of this tetrazine in methanol unfortunately hampered
our measurements.The results above indicates that coordination
of a hydroxyl-substituent
on the tetrazine to the boronic acid has a positive influence on the
rate of the iEDDA cycloaddition. Furthermore, the hydroxyl-substituted
tetrazines are much more selective for VBA than for norbornene. Whereas
dipyridyl-s-tetrazine 2a gives comparable
rate constants for both alkenes, tetrazine 2n gives,
for example, a 52-fold higher k2 for VBA 1 than for norbornene 8. To validate that the
increase in reactivity of the VBAs toward the hydroxyl-substituted
tetrazines is indeed caused by coordination, we isolated the product
of VBA 1 and tetrazine 2l (Figure B). Since the reaction of VBA 1 with tetrazine 2l gave several tautomers of
the dihydropyridazine, we oxidized the product to the corresponding
pyridazine to facilitate characterization of the product. This two-step
reaction gave pyridazine 9 as a single isomer in nearly
quantitative yield with the phenyl substituent on the 5-position of
the pyridazine ring, demonstrating the coordination of the boronic
acid to the o-hydroxyphenyl ring of tetrazine 2l. The reaction of VBA 1 with tetrazine 2n also resulted in a single product after oxidation; however,
the exact regioisomer could not be established due to the absence
of a clear NOESY signal in 2D 1H NMR.
Stability of
Tetrazines in Aqueous Environment
The
bioorthogonal application of tetrazines requires that these moieties
are stable in aqueous solution or biological environment. However,
some tetrazines slowly decompose in aqueous environment with especially
electron-withdrawing substituents destabilizing the aromatic ring.[28,29] As we expect that the hydroxyl-containing tetrazines described above
are more electron-rich than the pyridyl- or pyrimidyl-substituted
tetrazines, we predicted that the former also have superior stability.
Therefore, we tested the stability of tetrazines 2a,c–n in aqueous environment at 37 °C
by measuring the decrease in absorbance of the tetrazines at 540 nm
(Figure , Table S2).
Figure 5
Decrease of absorbance at 540 nm of tetrazines 2a,c–n in 1:9 DMSO/PBS (pH
= 7.4) at 37 °C.
The normalized mean with SD is plotted. [a] Measured in 1:1 DMSO/PBS
(pH = 7.4) as tetrazines 2d and 2m were insoluble in 1:9 DMSO/PBS.
Decrease of absorbance at 540 nm of tetrazines 2a,c–n in 1:9 DMSO/PBS (pH
= 7.4) at 37 °C.
The normalized mean with SD is plotted. [a] Measured in 1:1 DMSO/PBS
(pH = 7.4) as tetrazines 2d and 2m were insoluble in 1:9 DMSO/PBS.As expected, we observed that dipyridyl-s-tetrazines 2a as well as pyrimidyl-substituted tetrazines 2f and 2g were rather unstable, with 60–85%
of
the tetrazines being degraded after 12 h in 1:9 DMSO/PBS. In contrast,
the more electron-rich pyridyl tetrazines 2d and 2e and phenyl tetrazines 2c and 2h were more stable, with at least 75% of the tetrazines remaining
after 12 h. To our delight, all hydroxyl-substituted tetrazines 2i–n were similarly stable and only marginal
degradation was visible after 12 h.
Conclusions
To
conclude, we set out here to gain more insight in the notable
reactivity of VBAs toward tetrazines containing a pyridine substituent,
of which the nitrogen coordinates to the boronic acid of the VBA.
We compared the reactivity of vinylboronic acids to their negatively
chargedboronate anion in the tetrazine ligation using DFT calculations
and an experimental setup, where we changed the pH of the reaction
buffer, and observed that the more electron-rich boronate anion gave
a faster reaction with tetrazines. We synthesized several hydroxyl-substituted
tetrazines and showed that the hydroxyl substituent coordinates to
the boronic acid and increases the rate constants of the tetrazine
ligation with VBAs of several orders of magnitude. Moreover, these
new tetrazines were more electron-rich than the pyridyl-substituted
tetrazines giving lower rate constants with norbornene and favoring
reactivity toward VBA due to coordination. Furthermore, the hydroxyl-substituted
tetrazines were found to be more stable in aqueous media and therefore
more suitable for a bioorthogonal application requiring long incubation
times compared to the pyridyl-substituted tetrazines. The developed
hydroxyl-substituted tetrazines are a valuable asset for bioorthogonal
conjugation due to their small size, stability, and hydrophilic character.
Furthermore, the selectivity of the hydroxyl tetrazines toward VBAs
renders them potential candidates for use in orthogonal bioorthogonal
tetrazine ligations for dual labeling of biomolecules, when combined
with the reaction of a strained alkene and a tetrazine lacking a boron-coordinating
substituent.
Authors: David M Patterson; Lidia A Nazarova; Bryan Xie; David N Kamber; Jennifer A Prescher Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Annika Borrmann; Sigrid Milles; Tilman Plass; Jan Dommerholt; Jorge M M Verkade; Manfred Wiessler; Carsten Schultz; Jan C M van Hest; Floris L van Delft; Edward A Lemke Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Sjoerd J Rijpkema; Sabine G H A Langens; Marnix R van der Kolk; Katerina Gavriel; B Jelle Toebes; Daniela A Wilson Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Song Yu; Hans M de Bruijn; Dennis Svatunek; Trevor A Hamlin; F Matthias Bickelhaupt Journal: ChemistryOpen Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Rocío García-Vázquez; Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen; Klas Erik Bratteby; Vladimir Shalgunov; Lars Hvass; Matthias M Herth; Andreas Kjær; Umberto Maria Battisti Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-02-18
Authors: Zbigniew Zawada; Zijian Guo; Bruno L Oliveira; Claudio D Navo; He Li; Pedro M S D Cal; Francisco Corzana; Gonzalo Jiménez-Osés; Gonçalo J L Bernardes Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 4.774