Literature DB >> 30075970

Reliability & validity of the LIBRE Profile.

Emily C Dore1, Molly Marino1, Pengsheng Ni1, Julieta Lomelin-Gascon1, Lily Sonis1, Flor Amaya1, Colleen M Ryan2, Jeffrey C Schneider3, Alan M Jette4, Lewis E Kazis5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile© was developed using Item Response Theory methods to assess social participation after a burn injury. The LIBRE Profile measures six areas of social participation: Relationships with Family & Friends, Social Interactions, Social Activities, Work & Employment, Romantic Relationships, and Sexual Relationships. It can be administered through a computerized adaptive test or through fixed short forms. The goal of this study was to further examine the psychometric properties of the LIBRE Profile, including reliability and validity.
METHODS: We examined the validity of the LIBRE Profile by administering the six LIBRE Profile scales as well as legacy measures that assessed similar constructs. We calculated the Pearson correlations between the LIBRE Profile scales and the scores on the same-domain and cross-domain legacy measures to evaluate convergent and divergent validity. We then administered the LIBRE Profile scales a second time, seven to ten days after the first administration, to a sample of adult burn survivors to evaluate test-retest reliability. We calculated repeatability coefficients, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change to establish the threshold beyond which the amount of change observed across an episode of care cannot be explained as measurement error.
RESULTS: For reliability, the repeatability coefficients ranged from 7.31 to 9.27 and SEMs ranged from 2.62 to 3.39 for all six scales. MDC90 values ranged from 6.08 to 7.86 points, and MDC95 values ranged from 7.26 to 9.40 points. All correlations between the LIBRE Profile scales and legacy measures are significant (p<0.05) and in the expected directions for both convergent and divergent validity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence for the reliability and validity of the LIBRE Profile, one of the first tools that measures exclusively the social participation after a burn injury.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burns; Item Response Theory; Outcomes; Psychometrics; Reliability; Social reintegration; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30075970      PMCID: PMC9201556          DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.609


  33 in total

1.  Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity.

Authors:  Cheryl Koopman; Kenneth R Pelletier; James F Murray; Claire E Sharda; Marc L Berger; Robin S Turpin; Paul Hackleman; Pamela Gibson; Danielle M Holmes; Talor Bendel
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial.

Authors:  Shuya Chen; Steven L Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul A Thompson; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy.

Authors:  Stephen M Haley; Maria A Fragala-Pinkham
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05

4.  Measuring the Social Impact of Burns on Survivors.

Authors:  Molly Marino; Marina Soley-Bori; Alan M Jette; Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Amy Acton; Flor Amaya; Melinda Rossi; Rene Soria-Saucedo; Linda Resnik; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function.

Authors:  G Smilkstein; C Ashworth; D Montano
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children burn outcomes questionnaire: construction and psychometric properties.

Authors:  L H Daltroy; M H Liang; C B Phillips; M B Daugherty; M Hinson; M Jenkins; R McCauley; W Meyer; A Munster; F Pidcock; D Reilly; W Tunell; G Warden; D Wood; R Tompkins; M Cullen; C Calvert; J Hunt; G Purdue; J Saffle; R Yurt
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Psychosocial care of persons with severe burns.

Authors:  Patricia E Blakeney; Laura Rosenberg; Marta Rosenberg; A W Faber
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Relationships between the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) and the SF-36 among young adults burned as children.

Authors:  Christine P Baker; Marta Rosenberg; Kurt A Mossberg; Charles Holzer; Patricia Blakeney; Rhonda Robert; Christopher Thomas; Walter Meyer
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Joseph E Schwartz; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

Authors:  J E Brazier; R Harper; N M Jones; A O'Cathain; K J Thomas; T Usherwood; L Westlake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18
View more
  6 in total

1.  Sexual activity and romantic relationships after burn injury: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) study.

Authors:  Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Audrey E Wolfe; Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Interpreting Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile Scores for Use by Clinicians, Burn Survivors, and Researchers.

Authors:  Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Amy Acton; Flor Amaya; Cayla Saret; Emily Ohrtman; Audrey Wolfe; Pengsheng Ni; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 1.845

3.  Beyond lessons learned: Establishing longitudinal data collection to improve burn disaster response.

Authors:  Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; James C Jeng
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Social Participation of Burn Survivors and the General Population in Work and Employment: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile Study.

Authors:  Cayla J Saret; Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 1.819

5.  Social Interactions and Social Activities After Burn Injury: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.

Authors:  Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Laura C Simko; Emily Dore; Mary D Slavin; Cayla Saret; Flor Amaya; J Lomelin-Gascon; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.819

6.  Extreme response style bias in burn survivors.

Authors:  Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Lily Sonis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Alan M Jette; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.