BACKGROUND: Guidelines regarding specific resection margins for primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) are not well established. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 1- to 2-cm resection margins. This study aimed to determine the impact of margin width on local recurrence (LR), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and type of wound closure. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection of primary MCC at a single institution from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients underwent resection of primary MCC with resection margin width identified in the operative report. The median age was 76 years, and 65.8% of the patients were men. Of the 240 patients, 85 (35.4%) had head and neck primaries, 140 (58.3%) had extremity primaries, and 15 (6.3%) had trunk primaries. In terms of margins, 69 patients (28.8%) had a margin of 1 cm, 36 patients (15%) had a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 135 patients (56.2%) had a margin of 2 cm or more. The median follow-up period was 21 months. The LR rate was 2.9% for a margin of 1 cm, 2.8% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 5.2% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.80). The 5-year OS was 63.6% for a margin of 1 cm, 59.7% for a margin of 1.1-1.9, and 70.7% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.66). The 5-year DSS was 80.3% for a margin of 1 cm, 66.2% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 91.8% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.28). For wound closure, 43.5, 50, and 65.9% of the patients respectively required a flap or graft with a margin of 1, 1.1-1.9, and 2 cm or more (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-cm resection margins did not increase the risk of LR. Margin width did not make a significant difference in DSS or OS. Larger resection margins increase the need for a graft or flap closure.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines regarding specific resection margins for primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) are not well established. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 1- to 2-cm resection margins. This study aimed to determine the impact of margin width on local recurrence (LR), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and type of wound closure. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection of primary MCC at a single institution from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients underwent resection of primary MCC with resection margin width identified in the operative report. The median age was 76 years, and 65.8% of the patients were men. Of the 240 patients, 85 (35.4%) had head and neck primaries, 140 (58.3%) had extremity primaries, and 15 (6.3%) had trunk primaries. In terms of margins, 69 patients (28.8%) had a margin of 1 cm, 36 patients (15%) had a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 135 patients (56.2%) had a margin of 2 cm or more. The median follow-up period was 21 months. The LR rate was 2.9% for a margin of 1 cm, 2.8% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 5.2% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.80). The 5-year OS was 63.6% for a margin of 1 cm, 59.7% for a margin of 1.1-1.9, and 70.7% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.66). The 5-year DSS was 80.3% for a margin of 1 cm, 66.2% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 91.8% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.28). For wound closure, 43.5, 50, and 65.9% of the patients respectively required a flap or graft with a margin of 1, 1.1-1.9, and 2 cm or more (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-cm resection margins did not increase the risk of LR. Margin width did not make a significant difference in DSS or OS. Larger resection margins increase the need for a graft or flap closure.
Authors: U Veronesi; N Cascinelli; J Adamus; C Balch; D Bandiera; A Barchuk; R Bufalino; P Craig; J De Marsillac; J C Durand Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1988-05-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C M Balch; S J Soong; T Smith; M I Ross; M M Urist; C P Karakousis; W J Temple; M C Mihm; R L Barnhill; W R Jewell; H J Wanebo; R Desmond Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Laura E Hudson; Shishir K Maithel; Grant W Carlson; Monica Rizzo; Douglas R Murray; Andrea C Hestley; Keith A Delman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: J Meirion Thomas; Julia Newton-Bishop; Roger A'Hern; Gill Coombes; Michael Timmons; Judy Evans; Martin Cook; Jeffery Theaker; Mary Fallowfield; Trevor O'Neill; Wlodek Ruka; Judith M Bliss Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-02-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kelly G Paulson; Song Youn Park; Natalie A Vandeven; Kristina Lachance; Hannah Thomas; Aude G Chapuis; Kelly L Harms; John A Thompson; Shailender Bhatia; Andreas Stang; Paul Nghiem Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Christopher K Bichakjian; Thomas Olencki; Murad Alam; James S Andersen; Daniel Berg; Glen M Bowen; Richard T Cheney; Gregory A Daniels; L Frank Glass; Roy C Grekin; Kenneth Grossman; Alan L Ho; Karl D Lewis; Daniel D Lydiatt; William H Morrison; Kishwer S Nehal; Kelly C Nelson; Paul Nghiem; Clifford S Perlis; Ashok R Shaha; Wade L Thorstad; Malika Tuli; Marshall M Urist; Timothy S Wang; Andrew E Werchniak; Sandra L Wong; John A Zic; Karin G Hoffmann; Nicole R McMillian; Maria Ho Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 12.693
Authors: Yun Song; Feredun S Azari; Rebecca Tang; Adrienne B Shannon; John T Miura; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Erica S Tarabadkar; Teresa Fu; Kristina Lachance; Daniel S Hippe; Thomas Pulliam; Hannah Thomas; Janet Y Li; Christopher W Lewis; Coley Doolittle-Amieva; David R Byrd; Jeremy T Kampp; Upendra Parvathaneni; Paul Nghiem Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Ellen M Zwijnenburg; Satish F K Lubeek; Johanna E M Werner; Avital L Amir; Willem L J Weijs; Robert P Takes; Sjoert A H Pegge; Carla M L van Herpen; Gosse J Adema; Johannes H A M Kaanders Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Elena Dellambra; Maria Luigia Carbone; Francesca Ricci; Francesco Ricci; Francesca Romana Di Pietro; Gaia Moretta; Sofia Verkoskaia; Elisa Feudi; Cristina M Failla; Damiano Abeni; Luca Fania Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2021-06-23