BACKGROUND: NCCN guidelines recommend 1 or 2 cm margins for melanomas 1-2 mm (T2 melanomas) in depth; however, no head-to-head comparison has been performed. We hypothesized 1- or 2-cm margins would have similar local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: An institutional database was queried for patients with 1.0-2.0 mm melanomas treated from July 1995 to January 2011. All had wide excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Patients without documented surgical margins or follow-up were excluded. Clinicopathologic and recurrence data were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 2,118 patients, 1,225 met study criteria. Of these, 576 had complete data: 224 (38.9%) had 1 cm margins and 352 (61.1%), 2 cm margins. Median follow-up was 38 months. Mean age was 52.6 years (range 11.3-86.7). Mean thickness was 1.27 and 1.48 mm (1 and 2 cm, respectively, p<0.001) with ulceration more common in the 2 cm group (12.3 and 21.3%, respectively; p=0.009). LR was 3.6 and 0.9% in the 1 cm versus 2 cm group, respectively (p=0.044). OS was 29.1 months with 1 cm and 43.7 months in the 2 cm group. On multivariate analysis, only head and neck location and nodal status were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, 1 cm margins were associated with a small increase in LR that did not impact OS. This is concordant with the NCCN recommendations; however, a prospective, randomized trial would be optimal.
BACKGROUND: NCCN guidelines recommend 1 or 2 cm margins for melanomas 1-2 mm (T2 melanomas) in depth; however, no head-to-head comparison has been performed. We hypothesized 1- or 2-cm margins would have similar local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: An institutional database was queried for patients with 1.0-2.0 mm melanomas treated from July 1995 to January 2011. All had wide excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Patients without documented surgical margins or follow-up were excluded. Clinicopathologic and recurrence data were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 2,118 patients, 1,225 met study criteria. Of these, 576 had complete data: 224 (38.9%) had 1 cm margins and 352 (61.1%), 2 cm margins. Median follow-up was 38 months. Mean age was 52.6 years (range 11.3-86.7). Mean thickness was 1.27 and 1.48 mm (1 and 2 cm, respectively, p<0.001) with ulceration more common in the 2 cm group (12.3 and 21.3%, respectively; p=0.009). LR was 3.6 and 0.9% in the 1 cm versus 2 cm group, respectively (p=0.044). OS was 29.1 months with 1 cm and 43.7 months in the 2 cm group. On multivariate analysis, only head and neck location and nodal status were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, 1 cm margins were associated with a small increase in LR that did not impact OS. This is concordant with the NCCN recommendations; however, a prospective, randomized trial would be optimal.
Authors: Priyanka V Gumaste; Nathaniel H Fleming; Ines Silva; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Judy Zhong; Iman Osman; Jennifer A Stein Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Matthew C Perez; Felipe R de Pinho; Amanda Holstein; Daniel E Oliver; Syeda M H Naqvi; Youngchul Kim; Jane L Messina; Erin Burke; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Amod A Sarnaik; C Wayne Cruse; Evan J Wuthrick; Louis B Harrison; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Matthew P Doepker; Zachary J Thompson; Kate J Fisher; Maki Yamamoto; Kevin W Nethers; Jennifer N Harb; Matthew A Applebaum; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Amod A Sarnaik; Jane L Messina; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Zsuzsanna Kurgyis; Lajos V Kemény; Tünde Buknicz; Gergely Groma; Judit Oláh; Ádám Jakab; Hilda Polyánka; Kurt Zänker; Thomas Dittmar; Lajos Kemény; István B Németh Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Andrew J Hayes; Lauren Maynard; Gillian Coombes; Julia Newton-Bishop; Michael Timmons; Martin Cook; Jeffrey Theaker; Judith M Bliss; J Meirion Thomas Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 41.316