Literature DB >> 3007278

DNA repair dependence of somatic mutagenesis of transposon-caused white alleles in Drosophila melanogaster after treatment with alkylating agents.

K Fujikawa, S Kondo.   

Abstract

DNA repair-defective alleles of the mei-9, mei-41, mus-104 and mus-101 loci of Drosophila melanogaster were introduced into stocks bearing the UZ and SZ marker sets. Males with the UZ marker set, z1 (zeste allele) and w+(TE) (genetically unstable white allele presumably caused by a transposable element), or the SZ marker set, z1 and w+R (semistable white allele caused by partial duplication of the w+ locus plus transposon insert), were exposed to EMS at the first instar. After emergence, adult males bearing red spots on lemon-yellow eyes were scored as flies with somatic reversions of w+(TE) or w+R. The relative mutabilities (relative values of reversion frequency at an equal EMS dose) of either w+(TE) or w+R in a repair-proficient strain and in mei-9, mei-41, mus-104 and mus-101 strains were 1: approximately 1.2:0.3:0.3:0.7, despite the fact that w+(TE) reverted two to three times as frequently as w+R under both the repair-proficient and repair-deficient genetic conditions. Similarly, after treatment with MMS, MNNG and ENNG, w+(TE) was somatically more mutable in the mei-9 strain and less mutable in the mei-41 and mus-104 strains than in the repair-proficient strain. From these results, we propose that mutagenic lesions produced in DNA by treatment with these chemicals are converted to mutant DNA sequences via the error-prone repair mechanisms dependent on the products of the genes mei-41+ (mei-41 and mus-104 being alleles of the same locus) and mus-101+, whereas they are eliminated by mei-9+-dependent excision repair. In contrast to the approximately linear responses of induced reversions of w+(TE) with ENNG in the repair-proficient, mei-9, and mei-41 strains, seemingly there were dosage insensitive ranges for induced reversion with MNNG in the repair-proficient and mei-41 strains, but not for reversion in the mei-9 strain; w+(TE) in the mus-104 strain was virtually nonmutable with MNNG and ENNG. These results suggest that O6-methylguanine (O6MeG) produced in DNA with MNNG, but not O6-ethylguanine produced with ENNG, is almost completely repaired in a low dose range by constitutive activity of DNA O6MeG transmethylase. From the distribution of clone sizes of spontaneous revertant spots and other data, we propose that both w+(TE) and w+R have a similar tendency to spontaneously revert more frequently at early rather than at later developmental stages probably reflecting a common property of their inserted transposons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3007278      PMCID: PMC1202761     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  16 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of deletion and base-change mutabilities of Escherichia coli B strains differing in DNA repair capacity (wild-type, uvrA-, polA-, recA-) by various mutagens.

Authors:  Y Ishii; S Kondo
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Unequal crossing-over associated with asymmetrical synapsis between nomadic elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  M L Goldberg; J Y Sheen; W J Gehring; M M Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The use of a mutationally unstable X-chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster for mutagenicity testing.

Authors:  B Rasmuson; H Svahlin; A Rasmuson; I Montell; H Olofsson
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Base-change mutagenesis and prophage induction in strains of Escherichia coli with different DNA repair capacities.

Authors:  S Kondo; H Ichikawa; K Iwo; T Kato
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Relationships among chromatid interchanges, sister chromatid exchanges, and meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Gatti; S Pimpinelli; B S Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Chemical mutagenesis.

Authors:  B Singer; J T Kuśmierek
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Role of DNA repair in ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L Prakash; D Higgins
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  The mei-9 alpha mutant of Drosophila melanogaster increases mutagen sensitivity and decreases excision repair.

Authors:  J B Boyd; M D Golino; R B Setlow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Lack of chemically induced mutation in repair-deficient mutants of yeast.

Authors:  L Prakash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Excision repair in Drosophila. Analysis of strand breaks appearing in DNA of mei-9 mutants following mutagen treatment.

Authors:  P V Harris; J B Boyd
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1980-11-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Induced rates of mitotic crossing over and possible mitotic gene conversion per wing anlage cell in Drosophila melanogaster by X rays and fission neutrons.

Authors:  T Ayaki; K Fujikawa; H Ryo; T Itoh; S Kondo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Heat shocks do not mobilize mobile elements in genomes of Drosophila melanogaster inbred lines.

Authors:  C Arnault; C Biémont
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Genome and stresses: reactions against aggressions, behavior of transposable elements.

Authors:  C Arnault; I Dufournel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.082

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.