Literature DB >> 30070026

Prescription of pressure injury preventative interventions following risk assessment: An exploratory, descriptive study.

Josephine Lovegrove1,2, Paul Fulbrook1,2,3,4, Sandra Miles1,2.   

Abstract

This exploratory, descriptive study aimed to identify and describe the pressure injury preventative interventions prescribed by nurses following the assessment of a patient's pressure injury risk and to compare the prescribed interventions relative to the assessed risk level. A total of 200 inpatients in a tertiary Australian hospital were included. Patients' charts were audited within 24 hours of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics, pressure injury risk assessment score and level, and preventative interventions prescribed. Most patients were assessed as not being at risk, with the largest group of at-risk patients assessed as being at high risk. Some not-at-risk patients were prescribed interventions intended for those at risk, while prescription rates of preventative interventions recommended for those at any level of risk were variable (6%-64%). Significant associations were found between assessed pressure injury risk and preventative intervention prescription. Preventative intervention prescription was inadequate, potentially exposing some patients to pressure injury. However, the association between intervention prescription and risk level suggests that nurses are prescribing interventions relative to risk. A more structured approach to intervention prescription according to risk level, such as a care bundle, may help to improve nurses' preventative intervention prescription and ensure that all at-risk patients receive appropriate preventative interventions.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient care planning; pressure injury; pressure injury prevention; pressure ulcer; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30070026      PMCID: PMC7950082          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  34 in total

1.  Exploring variation in pressure ulcer prevalence in Sweden and the USA: benchmarking in action.

Authors:  Lena Gunningberg; Nancy Donaldson; Carolyn Aydin; Ewa Idvall
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Adherence to evidence-based pressure injury prevention guidelines in routine clinical practice: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Wendy Chaboyer; Tracey Bucknall; Brigid Gillespie; Lukman Thalib; Elizabeth McInnes; Julie Considine; Edel Murray; Paula Duffy; Michelle Tuck; Emma Harbeck
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Pain associated with pressure injury: A qualitative study of community-based, home-dwelling individuals.

Authors:  Debra Jackson; Lisa Durrant; Emily Bishop; Helen Walthall; Ria Betteridge; Sarah Gardner; Wendy Coulton; Marie Hutchinson; Stephen Neville; Patricia M Davidson; Kim Usher
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Using Prophylactic Dressings to Minimize Sacral Pressure Injuries in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Rachel Walker; Leisa Huxley; Melanie Juttner; Elizabeth Burmeister; Justin Scott; Leanne M Aitken
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.075

5.  Knowledge and attitudes of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention: a cross-sectional multicenter study in Belgian hospitals.

Authors:  Dimitri Beeckman; Tom Defloor; Lisette Schoonhoven; Katrien Vanderwee
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Category I pressure ulcers: how reliable is clinical assessment?

Authors:  E Sterner; C Lindholm; E Berg; A Stark; B Fossum
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.913

7.  The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Wendy Chaboyer; Tracey Bucknall; Joan Webster; Elizabeth McInnes; Brigid M Gillespie; Merrilyn Banks; Jennifer A Whitty; Lukman Thalib; Shelley Roberts; Mandy Tallott; Nicky Cullum; Marianne Wallis
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Marie Gerdtz; Sarah Sage; Jane McCann; Amy Freeman; Theresa Vassiliou; Stephanie De Vincentis; Ai Wei Ng; Elizabeth Manias; Wei Liu; Jonathan Knott
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Comparison of two skin examination methods for grade 1 pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Theo Dassen; Nils Lahmann
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 10.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sally E M Bell-Syer; Jo C Dumville; Victoria Middleton; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Josephine Lovegrove; Paul Fulbrook; Sandra Miles
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Prescription of pressure injury preventative interventions following risk assessment: An exploratory, descriptive study.

Authors:  Josephine Lovegrove; Paul Fulbrook; Sandra Miles
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Prophylactic sacral protective dressings' effect on preventing pressure injury: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinyan Gong; Ruimin Xu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.099

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.