Literature DB >> 30069362

Application of a three-dimensional video system in the training for uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

Kook Nam Han1, Hyun Koo Kim1, Young Ho Choi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) video systems offer better depth perception and are associated with improved performance during endoscopic or robotic surgery. We compared the impact of a 3D video system with a two-dimensional (2D) video system on a simulation program for uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.
METHODS: We launched an endoscopic simulation program for uniportal surgery using a 3D high-definition video system for training surgeons and medical students. This program included three basic surgical skills: (I) peg transfer, (II) passing a needle through a 3-mm hole, and (III) suturing on a tailor-made skin model. We evaluated the impact of 3D vision during simulation for uniportal surgery in each task. Overall, 113 trainees (85 surgeons in training and 28 medical students) who had not experienced a 3D video system were registered in the program. The three surgical simulation skills were evaluated under 2D and 3D video systems.
RESULTS: The 3D video system allowed for shorter procedural times [92 participants (80.0%) in task 1, 102 (86.4%) in task 2, and 88 (74.6%) in task 3] and improved performance. Moreover, 65 s in task 1, 145 s in task 2, and 32 s in task 3 were shortened using the 3D video system. Post-simulation survey revealed improved depth perception (n=71, 60.2%) and handling of instruments on the uniportal surgical module (n=39, 33.1%) as advantages of the 3D video system during simulation. Sixty (50.8%) trainees were not negatively affected by the use of the 3D glasses; however, 53 (44.9%) felt eye discomfort during simulation.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the 3D video system has potential advantages, such as improved procedure time and handling of instruments, during basic simulation of uniportal surgery for surgical trainees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Three-dimensional video system; training; uniportal thoracoscopic surgery; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069362      PMCID: PMC6051836          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  28 in total

1.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections.

Authors:  Gaetano Rocco; Eveline Internullo; Stephen D Cassivi; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Mark K Ferguson
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

3.  Three-dimensional Laparoscopy: Does Improved Visualization Decrease the Learning Curve Among Trainees in Advanced Procedures?

Authors:  Kyle G Cologne; Joerg Zehetner; Loriel Liwanag; Christian Cash; Anthony J Senagore; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 4.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy.

Authors:  B Alaraimi; W El Bakbak; S Sarker; S Makkiyah; A Al-Marzouq; R Goriparthi; A Bouhelal; V Quan; B Patel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  The Geometric and Ergonomic Appeal of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Gaetano Rocco; Alessandro Pardolesi; Piergiorgio Solli
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.750

7.  A comparative analysis of lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy via three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus two-dimensional resection.

Authors:  Chengliang Yang; Lili Mo; Yegang Ma; Guilin Peng; Yi Ren; Wei Wang; Yongyu Liu; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for thoracic disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuyang Xu; Nan Chen; Aijia Ma; Zihuai Wang; Yingyi Zhang; Chengwu Liu; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

9.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson; Rafael S Andrade; Adam Boettcher; Ricardo Bardales; Robert A Kratzke; Peter S Dahlberg; Michael A Maddaus
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Imaging in Adult Versus Pediatric Laparoscopy: A Simulator Box Study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Feng; Anna Morandi; Tawan Imvised; Benno Ure; Joachim F Kuebler; Martin Lacher
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.