| Literature DB >> 30068345 |
Martin Bens1, Karol Szafranski2, Susanne Holtze3, Arne Sahm2, Marco Groth2, Hans A Kestler2,4, Thomas B Hildebrandt3, Matthias Platzer2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Naked mole-rats (NMRs) are eusocially organized in colonies. Although breeders carry the additional metabolic load of reproduction, they are extremely long-lived and remain fertile throughout their lifespan. This phenomenon contrasts the disposable soma theory of aging stating that organisms can invest their resources either in somatic maintenance, enabling a longer lifespan, or in reproduction, at the cost of longevity. Here, we present a comparative transcriptome analysis of breeders vs. non-breeders of the eusocial, long-lived NMR vs. the polygynous and shorter-lived guinea pig (GP).Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Eusociality; Naked mole-rat; RNA-seq; Reproduction; Sexual maturation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30068345 PMCID: PMC6090939 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-018-0546-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Fig. 1Principle component (PC) analysis of groups based on mean expression levels (four groups per tissue and species: 2 sexes × 2 statuses, except gonads; raw data provided in Additional file 2: Table S6). Tissues are separated by PC1 and PC3, species by PC2
Fig. 2a Ras related GTP binding B (RRAGB) is consistently differentially expressed between species across all tissues. RRAGB is known to interact with mTORC1 complex [33, 34]. b Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 (FGFR2) shows opposing direction of expression between NMR and GP in breeders vs. non-breeders
Numbers of DEGS identified in the different comparisons (FDR < 0.01)
| Tissue | Female vs. male | Breeder vs. non-breeder | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-breeder | Breeder | Females | Males | |||||
| GP | NMR | GP | NMR | GP | NMR | GP | NMR | |
| Hrt | 4 | 10 | 89 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Skn | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 223 |
| Lvr | 383 | 4 | 235 | 10 | 71 | 0 | 9 | 1 |
| Kid | 109 | 6 | 106 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Cer | 1 | 5 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyp | 2 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
| Pit | 347 | 9 | 307 | 47 | 114 | 114 | 2 | 1 |
| Thy | 3 | 0 | 2087 | 1791 | 675 | 285 | 1 | 0 |
| Adr | 858 | 4 | 824 | 533 | 0 | 201 | 1 | 4 |
| Gon | – | – | – | – | 18 | 502 | 3 | 381 |
| ED* | 1713 | 52 | 3654 | 2456 | 886 | 1130 | 18 | 610 |
| NR† | 1634 | 22 | 3398 | 2360 | 883 | 1078 | 14 | 598 |
*Significant expression differences across tissues
†Non-redundant set of significant expression differences across tissues
Fig. 3Euler diagrams showing overlaps of DEGs. a Female vs. male. b Breeder vs. non-breeder. c Gonads of NMR breeder vs. non-breeder and aging-related genes from the Digital Ageing Atlas (DAA)
Fig. 4Expression changes of nuclear genes encoding for mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes in status change of male NMRs (top) and GPs (bottom). DEGs are indicated by asterisk (*FDR < 0.05, **FDR < 0.01). Only NMRs show significant expression differences (skn 46 genes, mean fold-change 0.76; tes 46 genes, mean fold-change 1.89)
Fig. 5DEGs (FDR < 0.05) occurring in both comparisons: cross-species (NMR vs. GP, y-axes) and status change GPs (breeder vs. non-breeder, x-axes) separately for NMRs and GP. Correlation analysis between species shows opposing correlation (Lancaster procedure [47], p = 4.2 × 10−9), while status-related DEGs in NMR are positively correlated with cross-species DEGs (DEGs = 3820; spearman correlation = 0.17, p = 3.2 × 10−27), status-related DEGs in GP show a negative correlation (1434; −0.1; 1.8 × 10− 4)