Literature DB >> 30067122

Multiple components in direction learning in smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys.

Nathan J Hall1, Yan Yang2,3, Stephen G Lisberger1.   

Abstract

We analyzed behavioral features of smooth pursuit eye movements to characterize the course of acquisition and expression of multiple neural components of motor learning. Monkeys tracked a target that began to move in an initial "pursuit" direction and suddenly, but predictably, changed direction after a fixed interval of 250 ms. As the trial is repeated, monkeys learn to make eye movements that predict the change in target direction. Quantitative analysis of the learned response revealed evidence for multiple, dynamic, parallel processes at work during learning. 1) The overall learning followed at least two trial courses: a fast component grew and saturated rapidly over tens of trials, and a slow component grew steadily over up to 1,000 trials. 2) The temporal specificity of the learned response within each trial was crude during the first 100 trials but then improved gradually over the remaining trials. 3) External influences on the gain of pursuit initiation modulate the expression but probably not the acquisition of learning. The gain of pursuit initiation and the expression of the learned response decreased in parallel, both gradually through a 1,000-trial learning block and immediately between learning trials with different gains in the initiation of pursuit. We conclude that at least two distinct neural mechanisms drive the acquisition of pursuit learning over 100 to 1,000 trials (3 to 30 min). Both mechanisms generate underlying memory traces that are modulated in relation to the gain of pursuit initiation before expression in the final motor output. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We show that cerebellum-dependent direction learning in smooth pursuit eye movements grows in at least two components over 1,100 behavioral learning repetitions. One component grows over tens of trials and the other over hundreds. Within trials, learned temporal specificity gradually improves over hundreds of trials. The expression of each learning component on a given trial can be modified by external factors that do not affect the underlying memory trace.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acquisition of motor learning; cerebellum; expression of motor learning; floccular complex; learned timing; sensory-motor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30067122      PMCID: PMC6230775          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00261.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  48 in total

Review 1.  Beyond parallel fiber LTD: the diversity of synaptic and non-synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum.

Authors:  C Hansel; D J Linden; E D'Angelo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Vincent Ethier; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  An essential memory trace found.

Authors:  Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  D J Krupa; J K Thompson; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. I. Changes in the responses of brain stem neurons.

Authors:  S G Lisberger; T A Pavelko; D M Broussard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Elimination of climbing fiber instructive signals during motor learning.

Authors:  Michael C Ke; Cong C Guo; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-16       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  The representation of time for motor learning.

Authors:  Javier F Medina; Megan R Carey; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Locomotor activity modulates associative learning in mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  Catarina Albergaria; N Tatiana Silva; Dominique L Pritchett; Megan R Carey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  6 in total

1.  Different mechanisms for modulation of the initiation and steady-state of smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Stuart Behling; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The Rules of Cerebellar Learning: Around the Ito Hypothesis.

Authors:  Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Passive Motor Learning: Oculomotor Adaptation in the Absence of Behavioral Errors.

Authors:  Matan Cain; Yehudit Botschko; Mati Joshua
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-03-22

4.  Principles of operation of a cerebellar learning circuit.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Nathan J Hall; Marios Tringides; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.

Authors:  Simon P Orozco; Scott T Albert; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  Retinal error signals and fluctuations in eye velocity influence oculomotor behavior in subsequent trials.

Authors:  Alexander Goettker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.