Literature DB >> 30066108

Karydakis flap reconstruction versus Limberg flap transposition for pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Dimitrios Prassas1, Thomas-Marten Rolfs2, Franz-Josef Schumacher2, Andreas Krieg3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The definitive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is surgical. There is still no consensus as to the most appropriate off-midline primary closure technique. The aim of this meta-analysis has been to compare Karydakis flap reconstruction (KF) to Limberg flap transposition (LF) with regard to short- and long-term postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KF to LF was performed. Data regarding postoperative outcomes were extracted and compared by meta-analysis. The odds ratio and standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified comparing KF (n = 554) to LF (n = 567). There was no significant difference noted between KF and LF with regard to the primary outcome variable, recurrence rate (OR = 1.07; 95% CI [0.59-1.92]; p = 0.83; 7 studies; I2 = 40%). LF was associated with a lower rate of post-operative seroma (OR = 2.03; 95% CI [1.15, 3.59]; p = 0.01; 7 studies; I2 = 0%). No further significant differences were noted in the secondary endpoints between the two study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates of PSD were found to be similar in both study groups. Post-operative seroma rate was significantly higher in the KF group. The meta-analysis did not indicate any further statistically significant differences between the two surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Karydakis plastic; Limberg plastic; Off-midline closure; Pilonidal sinus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30066108     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1697-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  25 in total

Review 1.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

2.  Comparison of modified Limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mehmet Tokac; Ersin Gurkan Dumlu; Murat Seyit Aydin; Abdussamed Yalcın; Mehmet Kilic
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

3.  New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  G E Karydakis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-12-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Mehmet Fatih Can; Mert Mahsuni Sevinc; Oguz Hancerliogullari; Mehmet Yilmaz; Gokhan Yagci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Khamis; Iain McCallum; Peter M King; Julie Bruce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 6.  Pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Tracy L Hull; James Wu
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Long-term results of limberg flap procedure for treatment of pilonidal sinus: a report of 200 cases.

Authors:  Koray Topgül; Ersin Ozdemir; Kadir Kiliç; Hakan Gökbayir; Zafer Ferahköşe
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Comparison of the short-term results after Limberg and Karydakis procedures for pilonidal disease: randomized prospective analysis of 100 patients.

Authors:  E Ersoy; A O Devay; R Aktimur; B Doganay; M Ozdoğan; R H Gündoğdu
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Randomized prospective comparison of midline and off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Barış Sevinç; Ömer Karahan; Ahmet Okuş; Serden Ay; Nergis Aksoy; Gürcan Şimşek
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Ashley E Humphries; James E Duncan
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  7 in total

1.  D-shape asymmetric excision in recurrent pilonidalis disease: an analytic longitudinal long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Luigi Brusciano; Gianmattia Del Genio; Salvatore Tolone; Michele Schiano di Visconte; Giorgia Gualtieri; Gianmattia Terracciano; Claudio Gambardella; Ludovico Docimo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-03-18

Review 2.  Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Rhiannon L Harries; Abdullah Alqallaf; Jared Torkington; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Comparison of postoperative quality of life of Limberg flap and Karydakis flap in pilonidal sinus operations.

Authors:  Sabahattin Destek; Hüseyin Kazım Bektaşoğlu; Enver Kunduz; Merve Nil Akyüz
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-03-18

4.  Analysis of Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Pilonidal Disease.

Authors:  Mackenzie N Abraham; Steven L Raymond; Russell B Hawkins; Atif Iqbal; Shawn D Larson; Moiz M Mustafa; Janice A Taylor; Saleem Islam
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-25

5.  Comparative analysis on the effect of Z-plasty versus conventional simple excision for the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: A retrospective randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Yong-Ping Yang; Ling-Yun Yu; Yi-Zhuo Wang; Jian Shi; Jian-Nan Li; Feng-Jia Shang; Jiao Wu; Tong-Jun Liu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Siwei Bi; Kaibo Sun; Shanshan Chen; Jun Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  R Perinotti; G Gallo; M Milone; L Basso; M Manigrasso; R Pietroletti; A Bondurri; M La Torre; G Milito; M Pozzo; D Segre
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.