Literature DB >> 33718427

Analysis of Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Pilonidal Disease.

Mackenzie N Abraham1, Steven L Raymond2, Russell B Hawkins2, Atif Iqbal3, Shawn D Larson2, Moiz M Mustafa2, Janice A Taylor2, Saleem Islam2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Numerous definitive surgical techniques exist for the treatment of pilonidal disease with varied recurrence rates and wound complications. Due to the wide array of techniques and lack of consensus on the best approach, we proposed to study our experience treating pilonidal disease in adolescents and young adults.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients 10-24 years old treated at a tertiary medical center from 2011 to 2016. Data including demographics, management, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Primary outcome was recurrence of disease.
Results: One hundred and thirty three patients with pilonidal disease underwent operative management. Fifty one percent underwent primary closure and 49% healed by secondary intention with no significant difference in recurrence rates (primary 18%, secondary 11%; p = 0.3245). Secondary healing patients had significantly lower wound complication rates (primary 51%, secondary 23%; p = 0.0012). After accounting for sex, race, weight, and operative technique, age was predictive of disease recurrence with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.706 (0.560-0.888; p = 0.003). Age and sex were both predictive of wound complications. Older patients had decreased risk of wound complication (adjusted OR 0.806, 95% CI 0.684-0.951; p = 0.0105), and male patients had increased risk of wound complication (adjusted OR 2.902, 95% CI 1.001-8.409; p = 0.0497).
Conclusion: In summary, there is no significant difference in the recurrence rates between operative techniques for pilonidal disease. Older patients have decreased risk of recurrence following intervention. Wound complication rates are lower in patients undergoing secondary healing, though this may be better explained by differences in age and sex. Additional research investigating newer, minimally-invasive techniques needs to be pursued.
Copyright © 2021 Abraham, Raymond, Hawkins, Iqbal, Larson, Mustafa, Taylor and Islam.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; management; pilondal sinus; pilonidal disease; recurrence; surgery; wound complication; young adults

Year:  2021        PMID: 33718427      PMCID: PMC7947800          DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.613605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Surg        ISSN: 2296-875X


  32 in total

1.  Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu; Resit Inceoglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal Disease.

Authors:  Eric K Johnson; Jon D Vogel; Michelle L Cowan; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Novel Approaches in Pilonidal Sinus Treatment.

Authors:  Arda Isik; Oguz Idiz; Deniz Firat
Journal:  Prague Med Rep       Date:  2016

Review 4.  Minimally invasive techniques in the management of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Ramya Kalaiselvan; Sonia Bathla; William Allen; Aloka Liyanage; Rajasundaram Rajaganeshan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A comparison of the cleft lift procedure vs wide excision and packing for the treatment of pilonidal disease in adolescents.

Authors:  Amir S Gendy; Richard D Glick; Andrew R Hong; Stephen E Dolgin; Samuel Z Soffer; Helen Landers; Michelle Herrforth; Nelson G Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  A pediatric surgeon's 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children's hospital.

Authors:  Ahmed Nasr; Sigmund H Ein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Experience with pilonidal disease in children.

Authors:  Frankie B Fike; Vincent E Mortellaro; David Juang; Daniel J Ostlie; Shawn D St Peter
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Khamis; Iain McCallum; Peter M King; Julie Bruce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

9.  Minimal surgery for pilonidal disease using trephines: description of a new technique and long-term outcomes in 1,358 patients.

Authors:  Moshe Gips; Yedidia Melki; Leon Salem; Ruben Weil; Jaqueline Sulkes
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Current management of adolescent pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Steven L Lee; Talar Tejirian; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.