Literature DB >> 30887467

D-shape asymmetric excision in recurrent pilonidalis disease: an analytic longitudinal long-term evaluation.

Luigi Brusciano1, Gianmattia Del Genio2, Salvatore Tolone2, Michele Schiano di Visconte3, Giorgia Gualtieri2, Gianmattia Terracciano2, Claudio Gambardella2, Ludovico Docimo2.   

Abstract

Sacrococcigeal pilonidalis disease (SPD) recurrence is a major factor influencing surgical outcomes. Several different surgical treatments have been reported, however, there is a lack of long-term data on reoperation. Aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of a single center adopting a standardized off-midline asymmetric procedure (D-shape). Analytic longitudinal assessment of 83 patients (median age 35 years, range 23-59 years) with recurrent SPD that completed the 5-year study design following D-shape reoperation. Among a cohort of 607 patients, we enrolled 83 recurrent SPD. After D-shape reoperation, second recurrence rate was 9.6% (8/83). Second recurrence rate was not statistically significantly different among patients undergone D-shape as first surgery compared to patients of symmetric excision group (11.8% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.57). Similarly, there was no statistical difference among patients who underwent D-shape as first surgery compared to patients who underwent symmetric excision elsewhere (11.8% vs. 9.1%, p = .75). D-shape is a safe and effective when adopted as revisional surgery at a long-term follow-up. Comparative evaluation is warranted to establish the potential superiority over different surgical surgery in case of recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetric excision; D-shape; Excision; Pilonidal sinus disease; Recurrent sinus; Sinus pilonidalis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30887467     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00644-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  20 in total

1.  Does prophylactic antibiotic reduce surgical site infections after rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for pilonidal disease: a prospective randomized double blind study.

Authors:  Muhammet Fikri Kundes; Kenan Cetin; Metin Kement; Levent Kaptanoglu; Osman Civil; Mustafa Haksal; Mehmet Eser; Ersin Gundogan; Nejdet Bildik
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iain J D McCallum; Peter M King; Julie Bruce
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-07

Review 3.  Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment.

Authors:  T G Allen-Mersh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Uğur Ekici; Murat Kanlıöz; Murat Ferhat Ferhatoğlu; Abdulcabbar Kartal
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.767

5.  Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  M Arnous; H Elgendy; W Thabet; S H Emile; S A Elbaz; W Khafagy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Do smoking and obesity really do not have any negative influence on wound healing after surgery of pilonidal disease?

Authors:  Cuneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Recurrence-free survival, but not surgical therapy per se, determines 583 patients' long-term satisfaction following primary pilonidal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Markus M Luedi; Theo Evers; Peter Kauf; Edouard Matevossian
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Pilonidal disease: long-term results of follicle removal.

Authors:  J Bascom
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Ali Guner; Aydin Boz; Omer Faruk Ozkan; Omer Ileli; Can Kece; Erhan Reis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Comparison of Primary Midline Closure, Limberg Flap, and Karydakis Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Murathan Erkent; İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner; Mesut Bala; Murat Kendirci; Murat Baki Yıldırım; Ramazan Topçu; Settar Bostanoğlu; Mete Dolapcı
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-12-11
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Laser treatment of pilonidal disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ivan Romic; Goran Augustin; Branko Bogdanic; Tomislav Bruketa; Trpimir Moric
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.161

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.