| Literature DB >> 30061669 |
M Darvish Ganji1, H Tavassoli Larijani2, R Alamol-Hoda3, M Mehdizadeh3.
Abstract
With the growing potential applications of nanoparticles in biomedicine especially the increasing concerns of nanoEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30061669 PMCID: PMC6065410 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29887-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Optimized structures of (a) golden fullerene (left: structural parameters for the hexagonal ring - right: structural parameters for the pentagonal ring), (b) non-glycine molecule and (c) non-Gly/Au32 complex in the gas phase obtained with B3LYP-D3-TZVP model. (d) The electron density difference plot and (e) bonding critical point (BCP) for the formed non-Gly/Au32 complex. The white, red, gray, blue and, gold spheres demonstrate the H, O, C, N, and Au atoms, respectively.
Calculated Laplacian and energy densities with B3LYP-TZVP model for Glycine/Anionic Glycine/Tripeptide glycine-Au32 complexes.
| Glycine | Anionic Glycine | Tripeptide glycine | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCP1 | BCP1 | BCP2 | BCP3 | BCP1 | BCP2 | |
| ρ (r) | 0.066 | 0.088 | 0.057 | 0.065 | 0.070 | 0.053 |
| ∇2ρ(r) | 0.214 | 0.275 | 0.228 | 0.267 | 0.278 | 0.213 |
| −0.011 | −0.022 | −0.006 | −0.009 | −0.012 | −0.005 | |
| G(r) | 0.064 | 0.091 | 0.063 | 0.075 | 0.081 | 0.058 |
Figure 2Optimized structures of (a) non-glycine molecule, (b) non-Gly/Au32 complex, (c) z-glycine molecule and, (d) z-Gly/Au32 complex, at aqueous solution obtained with the B3LYP-D3-TZVP level of theory. Calculated profiles of the HOMO and the LUMO frontier orbital depiction of (e) Au32 nanocage, (f) non-Gly and (g) non-Gly/Au32 complex (Isovalue is taken as 0.02 au).
Figure 3Optimized structures of (a) Tripeptide glycine molecule and (b) Tripeptide Gly/Au32 complex. (c) The bonding critical point (BCP) for the formed tripeptide glycine/Au32 complex.
Figure 4Optimized structures of (a) non-glycine molecule, (b) non-Gly/Au32 complex, (c) z-glycine molecule and, (d) z-Gly/Au32 complex, at aqueous solution obtained with the B3LYP-D3-TZVP level of theory.
Figure 5Optimized structure of (a) cysteine/Au32, (b) tyrosine/Au32, (c) histidine/Au32 and (d) phenylalanine/Au32 complexes.
Calculated adsorption energies, charge transfer and bonding distances for cysteine/tyrosine/histidine/phenylalanine-Au32 complexes.
| Systems | Eads (eV) | Hirshfeld Charge Transfer ( | Bonding Distance (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cysteine/Au32 | −1.172 | 0.281 | 2.448 |
| Histidine/Au32 | −1.096 | 0.217 | 2.427 |
| Phenylalanine/Au32 | −1.085 | 0.165 | 2.551 |
| Tyrosine/Au32 | −1.109 | 0.190 | 2.504 |
Figure 6Schematic illustration of (a) simulation box filled with 25 water molecules and the energetically favorable configuration of non-Gly/Au32 complex and (b) snapshot of non-Gly/Au32 complex at 10 ps of simulation time. Time evolution of equilibrium bonding distance between (c) Au and N atoms of Au32 nanocage and glycine molecule and (d) H and O atoms of the glycine.