Tiarnan D Keenan1, Elvira Agrón1, Amitha Domalpally2, Traci E Clemons3, Freekje van Asten4, Wai T Wong5, Ronald G Danis2, SriniVas Sadda6, Philip J Rosenfeld7, Michael L Klein8, Rinki Ratnapriya4, Anand Swaroop4, Frederick L Ferris1, Emily Y Chew9. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 2. Fundus Photographic Reading Center, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, Maryland. 4. Neurobiology-Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Unit on Microglia, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 6. Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California. 7. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 8. Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon; Devers Eye Clinic, Portland, Oregon. 9. Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: echew@nei.nih.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics of eyes with geographic atrophy (GA) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), including clinical and genetic factors affecting enlargement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study within a controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) participants, aged 50-85 years. METHODS: Baseline and annual stereoscopic color fundus photographs were evaluated for GA presence and area. Analyses included GA prevalence and incidence rates, Kaplan-Meier rates, mixed-model regression, and multivariable analysis of the square root of GA, area adjusted for covariates, including clinical/imaging characteristics and genotype. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Presence or development of GA; (2) change in the square root of GA area over time. RESULTS: At baseline, 517 eyes (6.2%) of 411 participants (9.8%) had pre-existing GA (without neovascular AMD), with the following characteristics: 33% central, 67% noncentral; and the following configurations: 36% small, 26% solid/unifocal, 24% multifocal, 9% horseshoe/ring, and 6% indeterminate. Of the remaining 6530 eyes at risk, 1099 eyes (17.3%) of 883 participants developedincident GA without prior neovascular disease during mean follow-up of 4.4 years. The Kaplan-Meier rate of incident GA was 19% of eyes at 5 years. In eyes with incident GA, 4-year risk of subsequent neovascular AMD was 29%. In eyes with incident noncentral GA, 4-year risk of central involvement was 57%. GA enlargement rate (following square root transformation) was similar in eyes with pre-existing GA (0.29 mm/year; 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.30) and incident GA (0.28 mm/year; 0.27-0.30). In the combined group, GA enlargement was significantly faster with noncentrality, multifocality, intermediate baseline size, and bilateral GA (P < 0.0001 for interaction in each case) but not with AREDS2 treatment assignment (P = 0.33) or smoking status (P = 0.05). Enlargement was significantly faster with ARMS2 risk (P < 0.0001), C3 non-risk (P = 0.0002), and APOE non-risk (P = 0.001) genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of AREDS2 data on natural history of GA provide representative data on GA evolution and enlargement. GA enlargement, which was influenced by lesion features, was relentless, resulting in rapid central vision loss. The genetic variants associated with faster enlargement were partially distinct from those associated with risk of incident GA. These findings are relevant to further investigations of GA pathogenesis and clinical trial planning. Published by Elsevier Inc.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To analyze the prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics of eyes with geographic atrophy (GA) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), including clinical and genetic factors affecting enlargement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study within a controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) participants, aged 50-85 years. METHODS: Baseline and annual stereoscopic color fundus photographs were evaluated for GA presence and area. Analyses included GA prevalence and incidence rates, Kaplan-Meier rates, mixed-model regression, and multivariable analysis of the square root of GA, area adjusted for covariates, including clinical/imaging characteristics and genotype. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Presence or development of GA; (2) change in the square root of GA area over time. RESULTS: At baseline, 517 eyes (6.2%) of 411 participants (9.8%) had pre-existing GA (without neovascular AMD), with the following characteristics: 33% central, 67% noncentral; and the following configurations: 36% small, 26% solid/unifocal, 24% multifocal, 9% horseshoe/ring, and 6% indeterminate. Of the remaining 6530 eyes at risk, 1099 eyes (17.3%) of 883 participants developed incident GA without prior neovascular disease during mean follow-up of 4.4 years. The Kaplan-Meier rate of incident GA was 19% of eyes at 5 years. In eyes with incident GA, 4-year risk of subsequent neovascular AMD was 29%. In eyes with incident noncentral GA, 4-year risk of central involvement was 57%. GA enlargement rate (following square root transformation) was similar in eyes with pre-existing GA (0.29 mm/year; 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.30) and incident GA (0.28 mm/year; 0.27-0.30). In the combined group, GA enlargement was significantly faster with noncentrality, multifocality, intermediate baseline size, and bilateral GA (P < 0.0001 for interaction in each case) but not with AREDS2 treatment assignment (P = 0.33) or smoking status (P = 0.05). Enlargement was significantly faster with ARMS2 risk (P < 0.0001), C3 non-risk (P = 0.0002), and APOE non-risk (P = 0.001) genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of AREDS2 data on natural history of GA provide representative data on GA evolution and enlargement. GA enlargement, which was influenced by lesion features, was relentless, resulting in rapid central vision loss. The genetic variants associated with faster enlargement were partially distinct from those associated with risk of incident GA. These findings are relevant to further investigations of GA pathogenesis and clinical trial planning. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Alicja R Rudnicka; Zakariya Jarrar; Richard Wormald; Derek G Cook; Astrid Fletcher; Christopher G Owen Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Anne S Lindblad; Patricia C Lloyd; Traci E Clemons; Gary R Gensler; Frederick L Ferris; Michael L Klein; Jane R Armstrong Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-09
Authors: Zohar Yehoshua; Carlos Alexandre de Amorim Garcia Filho; Renata Portella Nunes; Giovanni Gregori; Fernando M Penha; Andrew A Moshfeghi; Hongrong Luo; Zhang Kang; SriniVas Sadda; William Feuer; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Usha Chakravarthy; Tien Y Wong; Astrid Fletcher; Elisabeth Piault; Christopher Evans; Gergana Zlateva; Ronald Buggage; Andreas Pleil; Paul Mitchell Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Srinivas R Sadda; Robyn Guymer; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Christine A Curcio; Alan C Bird; Barbara A Blodi; Ferdinando Bottoni; Usha Chakravarthy; Emily Y Chew; Karl Csaky; Ronald P Danis; Monika Fleckenstein; K Bailey Freund; Juan Grunwald; Carel B Hoyng; Glenn J Jaffe; Sandra Liakopoulos; Jordi M Monés; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Philip J Rosenfeld; David Sarraf; Richard F Spaide; Ramin Tadayoni; Adnan Tufail; Sebastian Wolf; Giovanni Staurenghi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Panos G Christakis; Elvira Agrón; Michael L Klein; Traci E Clemons; J Peter Campbell; Frederick L Ferris; Emily Y Chew; Tiarnan D Keenan Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 12.079