Literature DB >> 22176800

Age and gender variations in age-related macular degeneration prevalence in populations of European ancestry: a meta-analysis.

Alicja R Rudnicka1, Zakariya Jarrar, Richard Wormald, Derek G Cook, Astrid Fletcher, Christopher G Owen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain prevalence estimates of age-related macular degeneration (AMD; late, geographic atrophy, neovascular) by age and gender amongst populations of European ancestry taking into account study design and time trends.
DESIGN: Systematic review of population-based studies published by September 2010 with quantitative estimates of geographic atrophy (GA), neovascular (NV), and late AMD prevalence. Studies were identified by a literature search of MEDLINE (from 1950), EMBASE (from 1980), and Web of Science (from 1980) databases. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 25 published studies (57 173 subjects: 455 with GA, 464 with NVAMD, and 1571 with late AMD).
METHODS: Bayesian meta-regression of the log odds of AMD with age, gender, and year of study allowing for differences in study design characteristics, to estimate prevalences of AMD (late, GA, NVAMD) along with 95% credible intervals (CrI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Log odds and prevalence of AMD.
RESULTS: There was considerable heterogeneity in prevalence rates between studies; for late AMD, 20% of the variability in prevalence rates was explained by differences in age and 50% by study characteristics. The prevalence of AMD increased exponentially with age (odds ratio [OR], 4.2 per decade; 95% CrI, 3.8-4.6), which did not differ by gender. There was some evidence to suggest higher risk of NVAMD in women compared with men (OR, 1.2; 95% CrI, 1.0-1.5). Compared with studies using fundus imaging and international classification systems, studies using fundus imaging with alternative classifications were more likely (OR, 2.7; 95% CrI, 1.1-2.8), and studies using alternative classifications without fundus imaging most likely to diagnose late AMD (OR, 2.9; 95% CrI, 1.3-7.8). There was no good evidence of trends in AMD prevalence over time. Estimated prevalence of late AMD is 1.4% (95% CrI, 1.0%-2.0%) at 70 years of age, rising to 5.6% (95% CrI, 3.9%-7.7%) at age 80 and 20% (95% CrI, 14%-27%) at age 90.
CONCLUSIONS: Studies using recognized classifications systems with fundus photography reported the lowest prevalences of AMD taking account of age and gender, and were stable over time, with a potentially higher risk of NVAMD for women. These prevalence estimates can be used to guide health service provision in populations of European ancestry. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22176800     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  109 in total

1.  Pathological consequences of long-term mitochondrial oxidative stress in the mouse retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  Soo-jung Seo; Mark P Krebs; Haoyu Mao; Kyle Jones; Mandy Conners; Alfred S Lewin
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 2.  Optical Coherence Tomography Monitoring Strategies for A-VEGF-Treated Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  G Pron
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2014-08-01

3.  Blood flow velocity measured using the Retinal Function Imager predicts successful ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: early prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S C Böhni; J P Howell; M Bittner; L Faes; L M Bachmann; M A Thiel; M K Schmid
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Outcomes in Eyes with Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT).

Authors:  Ebenezer Daniel; James Shaffer; Gui-shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Daniel F Martin; Glenn J Jaffe; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Quantitative fundus autofluorescence in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Jonathan P Greenberg; Tobias Duncker; Russell L Woods; R Theodore Smith; Janet R Sparrow; François C Delori
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  [Atrophic age-related macular degeneration].

Authors:  C N von Strachwitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Histologic and Optical Coherence Tomographic Correlates in Drusenoid Pigment Epithelium Detachment in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam; Jeffrey D Messinger; Kenneth R Sloan; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Monika Fleckenstein; Tiarnán D L Keenan; Robyn H Guymer; Usha Chakravarthy; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Caroline C Klaver; Wai T Wong; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 52.329

9.  Study the past if you would define the future (Confucius).

Authors:  Tiarnan D Keenan; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Age-related macular degeneration: genetics and biology coming together.

Authors:  Lars G Fritsche; Robert N Fariss; Dwight Stambolian; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Christine A Curcio; Anand Swaroop
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 8.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.