| Literature DB >> 30057872 |
Alastair J E Moore1, Jason Wachsmann1, Murthy R Chamarthy1, Lloyd Panjikaran2, Yuki Tanabe1, Prabhakar Rajiah1.
Abstract
Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation and management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the current standard of care and provides accurate diagnosis with rapid turnaround time. CT also provides information on other potential causes of acute chest pain. With dual-energy CT, lung perfusion abnormalities can also be detected and quantified. Chest radiograph has limited utility, occasionally showing findings of PE or infarction, but is useful in evaluating other potential causes of chest pain. Ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scan demonstrates ventilation-perfusion mismatches in these patients, with several classification schemes, typically ranging from normal to high. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also provides accurate diagnosis, but is available in only specialized centers and requires higher levels of expertise. Catheter pulmonary angiography is no longer used for diagnosis and is used only for interventional management. Echocardiography is used for risk stratification of these patients. In this article, we review the role of imaging in the evaluation of acute PE.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography (CT); Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED); acute; angiography; clot; dual-energy; embolism; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); nuclear; ventilation-perfusion (VQ)
Year: 2018 PMID: 30057872 PMCID: PMC6039809 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.12.01
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther ISSN: 2223-3652