OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) perfusion and angiography versus ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and to assess the per-segment concordance rate of DECT and scintigraphy. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with proven pulmonary hypertension underwent V/Q scintigraphy and DECT perfusion and angiography. Each imaging technique was assessed for the location of segmental defects. Diagnosis of CTEPH was established when at least one segmental perfusion defect was detected by scintigraphy. Diagnostic accuracy of DECT perfusion and angiography was assessed and compared with scintigraphy. In CTEPH patients, the per-segment concordance between scintigraphy and DECT perfusion/angiography was calculated. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were diagnosed with CTEPH and 26 with other aetiologies. DECT perfusion and angiography correctly identified all CTEPH patients with sensitivity/specificity values of 1/0.92 and 1/0.93, respectively. At a segmental level, DECT perfusion showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.44) with scintigraphy. Agreement between CT angiography and scintigraphy ranged from fair (κ = 0.31) to slight (κ = 0.09) depending on whether completely or partially occlusive patterns were considered, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both DECT perfusion and angiography show satisfactory performance for the diagnosis of CTEPH. DECT perfusion is more accurate than angiography at identifying the segmental location of abnormalities. KEY POINTS: • Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is potentially treatable by surgery. • Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) allows angiography and perfusion using a single acquisition. • Both DECT perfusion and angiography showed satisfactory diagnostic performance in CTEPH. • DECT perfusion was more accurate than angiography in identifying segmental abnormalities.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) perfusion and angiography versus ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and to assess the per-segment concordance rate of DECT and scintigraphy. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with proven pulmonary hypertension underwent V/Q scintigraphy and DECT perfusion and angiography. Each imaging technique was assessed for the location of segmental defects. Diagnosis of CTEPH was established when at least one segmental perfusion defect was detected by scintigraphy. Diagnostic accuracy of DECT perfusion and angiography was assessed and compared with scintigraphy. In CTEPHpatients, the per-segment concordance between scintigraphy and DECT perfusion/angiography was calculated. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were diagnosed with CTEPH and 26 with other aetiologies. DECT perfusion and angiography correctly identified all CTEPHpatients with sensitivity/specificity values of 1/0.92 and 1/0.93, respectively. At a segmental level, DECT perfusion showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.44) with scintigraphy. Agreement between CT angiography and scintigraphy ranged from fair (κ = 0.31) to slight (κ = 0.09) depending on whether completely or partially occlusive patterns were considered, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both DECT perfusion and angiography show satisfactory performance for the diagnosis of CTEPH. DECT perfusion is more accurate than angiography at identifying the segmental location of abnormalities. KEY POINTS: • Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is potentially treatable by surgery. • Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) allows angiography and perfusion using a single acquisition. • Both DECT perfusion and angiography showed satisfactory diagnostic performance in CTEPH. • DECT perfusion was more accurate than angiography in identifying segmental abnormalities.
Authors: Edward T D Hoey; Saeed Mirsadraee; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; David P Jenkins; Deepa Gopalan; Nicholas J Screaton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: David P Jenkins; Michael Madani; Eckhard Mayer; Kim Kerr; Nic Kim; Walter Klepetko; Marco Morsolini; Philippe Dartevelle Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Anastasia Oikonomou; Carole J Dennie; Nestor L Müller; Jean M Seely; Fred R Matzinger; Fraser D Rubens Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Marius M Hoeper; Marc Humbert; Adam Torbicki; Jean-Luc Vachiery; Joan Albert Barbera; Maurice Beghetti; Paul Corris; Sean Gaine; J Simon Gibbs; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Guillaume Jondeau; Walter Klepetko; Christian Opitz; Andrew Peacock; Lewis Rubin; Michael Zellweger; Gerald Simonneau Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Eduard J van Beers; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Melvin R Mac Gillavry; Charlotte F J van Tuijn; Joost W J van Esser; Dees P M Brandjes; Mies C Kappers-Klunne; Ashley J Duits; Bart J Biemond; John-John B Schnog Journal: Chest Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Benjamin H Freed; Jeremy D Collins; Christopher J François; Alex J Barker; Michael J Cuttica; Naomi C Chesler; Michael Markl; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-06
Authors: Rahul D Renapurkar; Michael A Bolen; Sankaran Shrikanthan; Jennifer Bullen; Wadih Karim; Andrew Primak; Gustavo A Heresi Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2018-08