Literature DB >> 33593831

To scan or not to scan - D-dimers and computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the era of COVID-19.

Alexander A Tuck1,2, Harriet L White1,2, Badr A Abdalla1, Gwendolen J Cartwright1, Katherine R Figg1, Emily N Murphy1, Benjamin C Pyrke1, Mark A Reynolds1, Rana M Taha1, Hasan N Haboubi3.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had many ramifications on healthcare delivery and practice. As part of this, utilising biomarkers to risk stratify patients has become increasingly popular. During the COVID-19 pandemic the use of D-dimer has increased due to the evidence of COVID-19 induced thrombo-embolic disease. We evaluated the use of D-dimer on all hospital admissions during the peak of the pandemic and evaluated its sensitivity in diagnosing pulmonary embolic disease (PE). Patients without COVID-19 infection were as likely to have evidence of PE as their COVID-positive counterparts. However, the sensitivity of a D-dimer was higher in COVID-positive patients at a lower D-dimer level (>1,500 μg/L, sensitivity 81%, specificity 70%) than in those without clinical, immunological or radiological evidence of COVID-19 infection (D-dimer >2,000 μg/L, sensitivity 80%, specificity 76%). These data suggest higher D-dimer thresholds should be considered for the exclusion of pulmonary emboli. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; CTPA; D-dimer; pulmonary embolism; sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33593831      PMCID: PMC8002780          DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  24 in total

Review 1.  Integrated strategies for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  P S Wells
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Measurement of plasma fibrin D-dimer levels with the use of a monoclonal antibody coupled to latex beads.

Authors:  C S Greenberg; D V Devine; K M McCrae
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 3.  Reporting of D-dimer data in COVID-19: some confusion and potential for misinformation.

Authors:  Emmanuel J Favaloro; Jecko Thachil
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Evaluation of D-dimer ELISA test in elderly patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  B Tardy; B Tardy-Poncet; A Viallon; P Lafond; Y Page; C Venet; J C Bertrand
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  D-dimers and efficacy of clinical risk estimation algorithms: sensitivity in evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rajan T Gupta; Rajesh K Kakarla; Kevin J Kirshenbaum; Victor F Tapson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Never ignore extremely elevated D-dimer levels: they are specific for serious illness.

Authors:  T Schutte; A Thijs; Y M Smulders
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.422

7.  Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.

Authors:  Marc Righini; Josien Van Es; Paul L Den Exter; Pierre-Marie Roy; Franck Verschuren; Alexandre Ghuysen; Olivier T Rutschmann; Olivier Sanchez; Morgan Jaffrelot; Albert Trinh-Duc; Catherine Le Gall; Farès Moustafa; Alessandra Principe; Anja A Van Houten; Marije Ten Wolde; Renée A Douma; Germa Hazelaar; Petra M G Erkens; Klaas W Van Kralingen; Marco J J H Grootenboers; Marc F Durian; Y Whitney Cheung; Guy Meyer; Henri Bounameaux; Menno V Huisman; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Grégoire Le Gal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  D-dimer value in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism-may it exclude only?

Authors:  Magdalena Sikora-Skrabaka; Damian Skrabaka; Paolo Ruggeri; Gaetano Caramori; Szymon Skoczyński; Adam Barczyk
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care.

Authors:  Janneke M T Hendriksen; Geert-Jan Geersing; Wim A M Lucassen; Petra M G Erkens; Henri E J H Stoffers; Henk C P M van Weert; Harry R Büller; Arno W Hoes; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-08

10.  Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with COVID-19 at CT Angiography and Relationship to d-Dimer Levels.

Authors:  Ian Léonard-Lorant; Xavier Delabranche; François Séverac; Julie Helms; Coralie Pauzet; Olivier Collange; Francis Schneider; Aissam Labani; Pascal Bilbault; Sébastien Molière; Pierre Leyendecker; Catherine Roy; Mickaël Ohana
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Point-of-care transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Oscar Mp Jolobe
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  COVID-19 in the Radiology Literature: A Look Back.

Authors:  Mark M Hammer; Constantine A Raptis; Travis S Henry; Sanjeev Bhalla
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2022-07-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.