| Literature DB >> 30051899 |
P J Blowey1, S Velari, L A Rochford, D A Duncan, D A Warr, T-L Lee, A De Vita, G Costantini, D P Woodruff.
Abstract
The archetypal electron acceptor molecule, TCNQ, is generally believed to become bent into an inverted bowl shape upon adsorption on the coinage metal surfaces on which it becomes negatively charged. New quantitative experimental structural measurements show that this is not the case for TCNQ on Ag(111). DFT calculations show that the inclusion of dispersion force corrections reduces not only the molecule-substrate layer spacing but also the degree of predicted molecular bonding. However, complete agreement between experimentally-determined and theoretically-predicted structural parameters is only achieved with the inclusion of Ag adatoms into the molecular layer, which is also the energetically favoured configuration. The results highlight the need for both experimental and theoretical quantitative structural methods to reliably understand similar metal-organic interfaces and highlight the need to re-evaluate some previously-investigated systems.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30051899 PMCID: PMC6088372 DOI: 10.1039/c8nr02237b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale ISSN: 2040-3364 Impact factor: 7.790
Fig. 1(a & b) STM images at two different magnifications of the ordered phase formed by TCNQ on Ag(111) (Vsamp = –1.00 V, I = 55 pA). The substrate <110> directions are indicated by the white arrows. Superimposed on (b) is the surface unit mesh and a schematic representation of the TCNQ molecules. H atoms are coloured white, N atoms blue, C atoms black. For larger area STM images see ESI.† (c) LEED pattern recorded at a kinetic energy of 14.5 eV. The location of the beams match those predicted for a commensurate matrix as shown in the simulated pattern (d) obtained using the LEEDpat program,37 including the beams from the 6 symmetry-equivalent domains arising from the 3m symmetry of the substrate. The predicted beams in one sector of (c) are superimposed as open rings on the experimental pattern in (b). Yellow arrows correspond to the <211> directions of the primitive translation vectors of the substrate unit mesh.
Fig. 2SXP C 1s and N 1s spectra obtained from TCNQ on Ag(111) at photon energies of 435 eV and 550 eV, respectively. The four-component fit (red) to the C 1s spectrum was constrained to the molecular stoichiometry. Also seen are lower kinetic energy shake-up satellites (green) and a small higher kinetic energy component (grey) associated with radiation damage. The N 1s peak has underlying plasmon losses (purple) from the Ag 3d emission peaks.
Measured SXPS binding energies of the main C 1s and N 1s components
| Component | CH | CC1 | CC2 | CN | N |
| Binding energy/eV | 283.9 | 284.4 | 284.6 | 285.4 | 397.9 |
Coherent position (shown as D = (P + 1)d111) and coherent fraction values f obtained experimentally by NIXSW from the different C 1s photoemission components and from the N 1s emission (error estimates, discussed in ref. 43, are shown in parentheses in units of 0.01), compared with values obtained from DFT-D calculations for different structural models. The inequivalent C atom contributions are labelled as in Fig. 2. The total formation energies per unit mesh, relative to those of the model without adatoms, are shown in parentheses. For a representative set of NIXSW absorption profiles see ESI
|
|
| |||||||
| CH | CC | CN | N | CH | CC | CN | N | |
|
| 0.95(10) | 0.99(10) | 0.89(10) | 0.39(10) | 2.86(5) | 2.78(5) | 2.76(5) | 2.75(5) |
|
| ||||||||
| Adatoms (Δ | ||||||||
| None (0) | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 2.82 | 2.79 | 2.60 | 2.38 |
| 1 α (–101) | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.77 | 2.80 | 2.79 | 2.67 | 2.48 |
| 1 β (–46) | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.69 | 2.80 | 2.80 | 2.67 | 2.44 |
| 2 αβ (–111) | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.56 | 2.78 | 2.79 | 2.75 | 2.64 |
| 2 ββ (+4) | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.57 | 2.75 | 2.78 | 2.77 | 2.70 |
| 3 (–55) | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 2.74 | 2.78 | 2.84 | 2.88 |
| Weighted average at RT | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.60 | 2.78 | 2.79 | 2.73 | 2.59 |
Fig. 3Left: Top view of the DFT-D-optimised structural model of the TCNQ surface phase with three Ag adatoms per unit mesh (shown by the black lines). Notice that there are two symmetrically distinct Ag adatom sites in this model, labelled α and β. Alternative models with 1, 2 or 3 Ag adatoms missing were also explored (Table 2). Right: Side views of a single molecule within the no-adatom model and in the 3-adatom model resulting from both DFT and DFT-D calculations. Ag adatoms are shaded darker than the substrate atoms. Other colours as in Fig. 1(a).