Literature DB >> 30051055

Shoulder Dystocia Delivery by Emergency Medicine Residents: A High-fidelity versus a Novel Low-fidelity Simulation Model-A Pilot Study.

Danielle Hart1,2, Jessie Nelson2,3, Johanna Moore1,2, Eric Gross1,4, Adeleki Oni2,5, James Miner1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shoulder dystocia (SD) requires emergent intervention to prevent maternal and fetal harm, and simulation models for training can be expensive. We developed a novel, cheap and easily transportable low-fidelity simulation (LFS) model to compare to a commercially available high-fidelity simulation (HFS) model.
METHODS: Emergency medicine residents were randomized to training on the HFS or novel LFS model. Subjects completed a pretest and a 1-week and 6-month posttest including a self-assessment and a simulated SD delivery.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 43 residents completed the study (63%). The number of individuals performing dangerous maneuvers at baseline was similar, 1 week after training was five in HFS and 11 in LFS (p = 0.08) groups and at 6 months was again similar between groups. Mean checklist scores for appropriate actions increased 1 week after training but returned to baseline by 6 months and were similar between groups. The rate of successful delivery, median time to successful delivery, and maximum force applied improved at 1 week and was sustained at 6 months in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Within our limited study population, we did not find a large difference in the occurrence of dangerous actions during simulated SD delivery following HFS and LFS training. Our novel and easily transportable LFS trainer, assembled for less than US$10 each, may be a useful tool to train inexperienced providers on the steps of this procedure. However, this requires further study, as does whether HFS models with force monitoring capabilities may be helpful to train providers to minimize dangerous maneuvers such as the application of excessive force.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30051055      PMCID: PMC6001827          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  13 in total

1.  ACOG practice bulletin: Shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. (Replaces practice pattern number 7, October 1997).

Authors:  Robert J Sokol; Sean C Blackwell
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Evaluation of force applied during deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia using simulation.

Authors:  Shad H Deering; Leslie Weeks; Thomas Benedetti
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Pattern and degree of forces applied during simulation of shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Joanna F Crofts; Denise Ellis; Mark James; Linda P Hunt; Robert Fox; Timothy J Draycott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Shoulder dystocia: using simulation to train providers and teams.

Authors:  Jenifer O Fahey; Hugh E Mighty
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.638

5.  Prospective randomized trial of simulation versus didactic teaching for obstetrical emergencies.

Authors:  Kay Daniels; Julie Arafeh; Ana Clark; Sarah Waller; Maurice Druzin; Jane Chueh
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.929

6.  A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Matthew K Hoffman; Jennifer L Bailit; D Ware Branch; Ronald T Burkman; Paul Van Veldhusien; Li Lu; Michelle A Kominiarek; Judith U Hibbard; Helain J Landy; Shoshana Haberman; Isabelle Wilkins; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins.

Authors:  Joanna F Crofts; Christine Bartlett; Denise Ellis; Linda P Hunt; Robert Fox; Timothy J Draycott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Management of shoulder dystocia: skill retention 6 and 12 months after training.

Authors:  Joanna F Crofts; Christine Bartlett; Denise Ellis; Linda P Hunt; Robert Fox; Timothy J Draycott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Risk factors for shoulder dystocia: an engineering study of clinician-applied forces.

Authors:  R Allen; J Sorab; B Gonik
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Shoulder Dystocia Delivery by Emergency Medicine Residents: A High-fidelity versus a Novel Low-fidelity Simulation Model-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Danielle Hart; Jessie Nelson; Johanna Moore; Eric Gross; Adeleki Oni; James Miner
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-09-23
View more
  2 in total

1.  Shoulder Dystocia Delivery by Emergency Medicine Residents: A High-fidelity versus a Novel Low-fidelity Simulation Model-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Danielle Hart; Jessie Nelson; Johanna Moore; Eric Gross; Adeleki Oni; James Miner
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-09-23

Review 2.  Advancing Simulation-Based Orthopaedic Surgical Skills Training: An Analysis of the Challenges to Implementation.

Authors:  Kivanc Atesok; Shepard Hurwitz; Donald D Anderson; Richard Satava; Geb W Thomas; Ted Tufescu; Michael J Heffernan; Efstathios Papavassiliou; Steven Theiss; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-09-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.