Philip J Davis1, Michael Butler2, Kirk Magee3, Brent Thoma1, Christopher P Nickson4,5, N Seth Trueger6. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada. 2. Faculty of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada. 4. Intensive Care Unit Alfred Hospital Melbourne Australia. 5. School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Critics have raised concerns regarding the validity of maintenance of certification (MOC) programs. We sought to examine the quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) selected for the lifelong learning and self-assessment (LLS) component of the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) MOC program. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the ABEM LLS reading lists from 2004 to 2017 to identify RCTs with dichotomous outcomes and superiority designs. A fragility index (FI) was calculated using Fisher's exact test for all statistically significant dichotomous outcomes. Bivariate correlation was performed to examine associations between the FI and RCT study characteristics. Each included study was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias (ROB) tool. RESULTS: Thirteen superiority RCTs with dichotomous outcomes were included in the 2004-2017 LLS reading lists. Ten had a statistically significant outcome, and the majority were robust and at low ROB. The median trial size was 511 patients (interquartile range [IQR] = 251-1,517), and the median FI was 10 (IQR = 7-18); i.e., if 10 patients in the treatment arm had not had events, the results would not have been statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of RCTs included in the LLS are robust and at low ROB.
OBJECTIVE: Critics have raised concerns regarding the validity of maintenance of certification (MOC) programs. We sought to examine the quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) selected for the lifelong learning and self-assessment (LLS) component of the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) MOC program. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the ABEM LLS reading lists from 2004 to 2017 to identify RCTs with dichotomous outcomes and superiority designs. A fragility index (FI) was calculated using Fisher's exact test for all statistically significant dichotomous outcomes. Bivariate correlation was performed to examine associations between the FI and RCT study characteristics. Each included study was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias (ROB) tool. RESULTS: Thirteen superiority RCTs with dichotomous outcomes were included in the 2004-2017 LLS reading lists. Ten had a statistically significant outcome, and the majority were robust and at low ROB. The median trial size was 511 patients (interquartile range [IQR] = 251-1,517), and the median FI was 10 (IQR = 7-18); i.e., if 10 patients in the treatment arm had not had events, the results would not have been statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of RCTs included in the LLS are robust and at low ROB.
Authors: Francis L Counselman; Michael L Carius; Terry Kowalenko; Nicole Battaglioli; Cherri Hobgood; Andy S Jagoda; Elise Lovell; Lillian Oshva; Anant Patel; Philip Shayne; Jeffrey A Tabas; Earl J Reisdorff Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Donald M Yealy; John A Kellum; David T Huang; Amber E Barnato; Lisa A Weissfeld; Francis Pike; Thomas Terndrup; Henry E Wang; Peter C Hou; Frank LoVecchio; Michael R Filbin; Nathan I Shapiro; Derek C Angus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David M Spiro; Khoon-Yen Tay; Donald H Arnold; James D Dziura; Mark D Baker; Eugene D Shapiro Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Patrick Biston; Jacques Devriendt; Christian Madl; Didier Chochrad; Cesar Aldecoa; Alexandre Brasseur; Pierre Defrance; Philippe Gottignies; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Candice L Bjornson; Terry P Klassen; Janielee Williamson; Rollin Brant; Craig Mitton; Amy Plint; Blake Bulloch; Lisa Evered; David W Johnson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Henning R Andersen; Torsten T Nielsen; Klaus Rasmussen; Leif Thuesen; Henning Kelbaek; Per Thayssen; Ulrik Abildgaard; Flemming Pedersen; Jan K Madsen; Peer Grande; Anton B Villadsen; Lars R Krusell; Torben Haghfelt; Preben Lomholt; Steen E Husted; Else Vigholt; Henrik K Kjaergard; Leif Spange Mortensen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian Roberts; David Yates; Peter Sandercock; Barbara Farrell; Jonathan Wasserberg; Gabrielle Lomas; Rowland Cottingham; Petr Svoboda; Nigel Brayley; Guy Mazairac; Véronique Laloë; Angeles Muñoz-Sánchez; Miguel Arango; Bennie Hartzenberg; Hussein Khamis; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt; Edward Komolafe; Fatos Olldashi; Yadram Yadav; Francisco Murillo-Cabezas; Haleema Shakur; Phil Edwards Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Oct 9-15 Impact factor: 79.321