| Literature DB >> 30048521 |
Katherine L Baldock1, Catherine Paquet1, Natasha J Howard2, Neil T Coffee3, Anne W Taylor4, Mark Daniel3,5,6.
Abstract
Much research has considered the relationship between neighbourhood crime and physical activity, but few studies have assessed clinical outcomes consequent to behaviour, such as cardiometabolic risk. Fewer still have simultaneously assessed perceived and objective measures of crime. Perceptions of crime and actual victimisation vary according to gender; thus, this study sought to assess: 1) correspondence between perceived and objective neighbourhood crime; and 2) gender-specific associations between perceived and reported crime and metabolic syndrome, representing cardiometabolic risk. The indirect effect of neighbourhood crime on metabolic syndrome via walking was additionally evaluated. An Australian population-based biomedical cohort study (2004-2007) collected biomedical, socio-demographic, and neighbourhood perceptions data from n = 1,172 urban-dwelling, adults. Area-level reported crime rates were standardised and linked to individual data based on participants' residential location. Correspondence between actual and perceived crime measures was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Cross-sectional associations between crime and metabolic syndrome were analysed using generalised estimating equations regression models accounting for socio-demographic factors and area-level income. Correspondence between perceived and objective crime was small to medium among men and women (r = 0.17 to 0.33). Among men, metabolic syndrome was related to rates of violent (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.35) and total crime (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32), after accounting for perceived crime. Among women, metabolic syndrome was related to perceived crime (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.60) after accounting for total reported crime. Among women, there were indirect effects of perceived crime and property crime on metabolic syndrome through walking. Results indicate that crime, an adverse social exposure, is linked to clinical health status. Crime rates, and perceptions of crime and safety, differentially impact upon cardiometabolic health according to gender. Social policy and public health strategies targeting crime reduction, as well as strategies to increase perceptions of safety, have potential to contribute to improved cardiometabolic outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30048521 PMCID: PMC6062143 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Individual socio-demographic and area-level characteristics, by gender.
| Men (n = 540) | Women (n = 632) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean/Median or % | SD/ IQR | Mean/Median or % | SD/IQR | |
| 56.2 | 14.2 | 54.3 | 13.8 | |
| Less than Bachelor's degree | 88.7% | 85.1% | ||
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 11.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Less than AUD$20,001 | 18.5% | 26.1% | ||
| AUD$20,001 to AUD$60,000 | 51.9% | 46.2% | ||
| More than AUD$60,000 | 29.6% | 27.7% | ||
| 43.5% | 29.6% | |||
| -0.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.0 | |
| 830.94 | 132.69 | 836.64 | 129.99 | |
| 174.9 | 149.4 | 168.5 | 105.8 | |
| 12.8 | 11.7 | 12.3 | 8.9 | |
| 97.8 | 73.4 | 103.6 | 61.1 | |
SD: Standard Deviation. IQR: Interquartile Range.
a Mean and SD reported.
b Median and IQR reported.
Associations between crime and metabolic syndrome, by gender.
| Men (n = 540) | Women (n = 632) | |
|---|---|---|
| Independent variable | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) |
| Perceived Crime | 1.06 (0.89 to 1.27) | 1.34 (1.14 to 1.59) |
| Total Crime | 1.18 (1.06 to 1.30) | 1.06 (0.87 to 1.29) |
| Violent Crime | 1.21 (1.12 to 1.32) | 1.05 (0.82 to 1.34) |
| Property Crime | 1.14 (1.00 to 1.29) | 1.01 (0.83 to 1.23) |
OR: Odds Ratio. CI: Confidence Interval.
Note: All models adjusted for participant age, income, education, and area-level income.
Independent associations between perceived and reported crime and metabolic syndrome, by gender.
| Perceived Crime | 1.03 (0.85 to 1.25) | 1.02 (0.83 to 1.24) | 1.04 (0.86 to 1.26) |
| Total Crime | 1.17 (1.04 to 1.32) | ||
| Violent Crime | 1.21 (1.08 to 1.35) | ||
| Property Crime | 1.13 (0.98 to 1.30) | ||
| Perceived Crime | 1.35 (1.14 to 1.60) | 1.36 (1.15 to 1.61) | 1.36 (1.14 to 1.62) |
| Total Crime | 0.97 (0.79 to 1.18) | ||
| Violent Crime | 0.94 (0.77 to 1.14) | ||
| Property Crime | 0.92 (0.76 to 1.13) | ||
Notes: Estimates reported are odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. All models are adjusted for potential confounders, including participant age, income, education, and area-level income. Models combine perceived crime with either total (a), violent (b) and property crime (c).
Associations between perceived and reported crime and walking, by gender.
| Men (n = 540) | Women (n = 632) | |
|---|---|---|
| Independent variable | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) |
| Perceived Crime | 0.88 (0.76 to 1.02) | 0.86 (0.77 to 0.96) |
| Total Crime | 0.97 (0.81 to 1.17) | 0.89 (0 .80 to 1.00) |
| Violent Crime | 0.92 (0.77 to 1.11) | 0.94 (0.84 to 1.05) |
| Property Crime | 0.97 (0.80 to 1.16) | 0.88 (0.79 to 0.98) |
RR: Relative Risk. CI: Confidence Interval.
a Models adjusted for participant age, income, education, area-level income, and total crime rates.
b Models adjusted for participant age, income, education, area-level income, and perceived crime.