Literature DB >> 19261660

Opening the Black Box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation.

Danella M Hafeman1, Sharon Schwartz.   

Abstract

Recent criticism of epidemiologic methods has focused on the limitations of 'black box' epidemiology, a pejorative label given to the simple identification of exposure-disease relationships. The assessment of mediation is an important tool for addressing this criticism. By using mediation analysis to open the black box, underlying mechanisms of the observed associations can be described and causal inference improved. An explicit theoretical motivation for such an analysis has been missing from the epidemiological literature. To provide this motivation, we integrate literature from epidemiology and other social sciences to describe the reasons that an investigator might want to assess mediation. We then describe the connections between these reasons and specific measures of indirect and direct effects that have been previously described.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19261660     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyn372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  66 in total

1.  The causal mediation formula--a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms.

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  An introduction to causal inference.

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Depressive Symptoms Mediate the Associations of Stigma with Medication Adherence and Quality of Life in Tuberculosis Patients in China.

Authors:  Lei Qiu; Yeqing Tong; Zuxun Lu; Yanhong Gong; Xiaoxv Yin
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Commentary: Gilding the black box.

Authors:  Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Socioeconomic position, gender, and inequalities in self-rated health between Roma and non-Roma in Serbia.

Authors:  Teresa Janevic; Janko Jankovic; Elizabeth Bradley
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Socioeconomic position and low-back pain--the role of biomechanical strains and psychosocial work factors in the GAZEL cohort.

Authors:  Sandrine Plouvier; Annette Leclerc; Jean-François Chastang; Sébastien Bonenfant; Marcel Goldberg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Bioavailable serum estradiol may alter radiation risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Eric J Grant; John B Cologne; Gerald B Sharp; Hidetaka Eguchi; Richard G Stevens; Shizue Izumi; Young-Min Kim; Amy Berrington de González; Waka Ohishi; Kei Nakachi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 9.  Principal stratification--a goal or a tool?

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  African American race and HIV virological suppression: beyond disparities in clinic attendance.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Sonia Napravnik; Stephen R Cole; Jay S Kaufman; Adaora A Adimora; Beth Elston; Joseph J Eron; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.