| Literature DB >> 30047367 |
Veeraraghavan Balaji1, Arti Kapil2, Jayanthi Shastri3, Agila Kumari Pragasam1, Geeta Gole3, Sirshendu Choudhari1, Gagandeep Kang4, Jacob John1.
Abstract
A very high incidence of typhoid was described in studies conducted in urban locations on the Indian subcontinent at the end of the twentieth century. Despite their availability, licensed immunogenic conjugate typhoid vaccines have not been introduced in the national immunization program, in part, because of a lack of understanding of where and for whom prevention is most necessary. Uncertainty regarding the burden of disease is based on the lack of reliable, recent estimates of culture-confirmed typhoid and an observed trend of low isolations of Salmonella Typhi and fewer complications at large referral hospitals in India. In this article, we examine the trends of S. Typhi isolation at three large tertiary care centers across India over 15 years and describe trends of recognized risk factors for typhoid from published literature. There appears to be a decline in the isolation of S. Typhi in blood cultures, which is more apparent in the past 5 years. These trends are temporally related to economic improvement, female literacy, and the use of antibiotics such as cephalosporins and azithromycin. The analysis of trends of culture-confirmed typhoid may not accurately capture the typhoid incidence trends if antibiotic use confounds the burden of disease presenting to larger facilities. Emerging antimicrobial resistance may result in a resurgence of disease if the underlying incidence and transmission of typhoid are not adequately addressed through public health approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30047367 PMCID: PMC6128365 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345
Figure 1.(A) Trends in Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi isolation at B Y L Nair Hospital, Mumbai. (B) Trends of S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. (C) Trends of S. Typhi isolation at Christian Medical College, Vellore.
Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi from Indian studies[11,16–24]
| Reference | Year of isolates | Ampicillin | Chloramphenicol | Co-trimoxazole | Nalidixic acid | Ciprofloxacin | Cefixime | Ceftriaxone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singhal et al. (2014)[ | 2001–2012 | < 5% | < 5% | < 5% | 100% | 5.8–18.2% 97.7% as per new criteria (2012) | 0% | 0% | |
| Dutta et al. (2014)[ | 2009–2013 | 18.2% | 22.1% | 23.4% | 98.7% | 19.5% | – | – | |
| Jain and Chugh (2013)[ | 2010–2012 | 3.7–6.5% | 2.7–4.6% | 0–3.7% | 93.5–100% | – | 0.9–2% | 0–2% | |
| Raza et al. (2012)[ | 2010–2011 | – | 6.4% | – | – | 0% | – | 4.3% | |
| Shetty et al. (2012)[ | 2009–2011 | 5.89% | 3.53% | 2.35% | 81.18% | 3.53% | – | 0% | |
| Menezes et al. (2011)[ | 2005–2009 | 34.1% | 34.1% | 34.1% | 78% | 8% | – | 0% | |
| Muthu et al. (2011)[ | 2007–2009 | 32.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 96.25% | 6.5% | – | 1.5% | |
| Bhattacharya et al. (2011)[ | 2005–2008 | 21.36% | 8.97% | 27.35% | – | 1.71% | – | 3% | |
| Dutta et al. (2014)[ | 2009–2013 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 96% | 20% | – | – | |
| Jain and Chugh (2013) | 2010–2012 | 3–6.2%, | 0% | 0% | 100% | – | 0–6.2% | 0–6.2% | |
| Raza et al. (2012)[ | 2010–2011 | 74.2% | 0% | 0% | – | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Shetty et al. (2012)[ | 2009–2011 | 18.75% | 0% | 0% | 62.5% | 18.75% | – | 6.25% | |
| Muthu et al. (2011)[ | 2007–2009 | – | 5% | 5% | – | 12.5% | – | 4.5% | |
| Bhattacharya et al. (2011)[ | 2005–2008 | 28.12% | 23.44% | 35.94% | – | 1.56% | – | 4.69% |
Trends in contextual factors in India between 1991 and 2015
| 1991 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2011 | 2014 | 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved sanitation (%) | Urban | 49.3 | 51.6 | 54.5 | 57.4 | 60.3 | 62.6 | 62.6 |
| Rural | 5.6 | 9.6 | 14.5 | 19.5 | 24.5 | 28.5 | 28.5 | |
| Open defecation (million) | 653 | 667 | 660 | 638 | 602 | 576 | 569 | |
| Adult female literacy rate (%) | 33.7 | – | 47.8 | 50.8 | 59.3 | – | 63.0 | |
| Population density (per square km) | 298.8 | 323.1 | 360.5 | 384.8 | 419.5 | 435.7 | 440.9 | |
| % Urban population living in slums | 54.9 | 48.2 | 41.5 | 34.8 | 29 | 24 | – | |
| Gross national income (in billion USD) | 314.01 | 360.6 | 475.4 | 830.1 | 1,715 | 2,012 | 2,092 | |
| GDP per capita in current USD | 309 | 381 | 460 | 730 | 1,455 | 1,577 | 1,598 | |
| Government spending on health (% of GDP) | – | 1.05 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.16 | 1.41 | – | |
| Cephalosporin use (standard units per 1,000 population) | – | – | 1,939 | 3,277 | 6,751 | 7,269 | – | |
GDP = gross domestic product.
Projected.
Figure 2.Trends in contextual factors. Panel A shows trends in access to improved sanitation, improved water supply, %GDP spending, adult female literacy rate, % of population living in urban slums, and open defecation. Panel B shows the trend in population density and GDP per capita. Panel C shows the use of cephalosporin in standard units per 1,000 population. GDP = gross domestic product.