Alan N West1,2,3, William B Weeks2,4, Mary E Charlton5,6. 1. Research Service, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont. 2. Geisel Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire. 3. Veterans Rural Health Resource Center - Eastern Region, White River Junction, Vermont. 4. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 5. Iowa City VA Health Care System, Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City, Iowa. 6. Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To understand how vouchers for non-VHA care of VHA-enrolled veterans might affect rural enrollees, we determined how much enrollees use VHA and non-VHA inpatient care, and whether this use varies substantially between rural and urban residents depending on state of residence. METHODS: For veterans listed in the 2007 VHA enrollment file as living in Arizona, Iowa, Louisiana, Tennessee, Florida, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, or New York, we merged 2004-2007 administrative discharge data for all VHA hospitalizations with all non-VHA hospitalizations listed in state health department or hospital association databases. Within states, rural and urban residents (RUCA-defined) were compared on VHA and non-VHA hospitalization rates, overall and for major diagnostic categories. FINDINGS: Non-VHA hospital use was much greater than VHA use, though it also was more variable across states. In states with higher proportions of urban enrollees, use of non-VHA hospitals was lower for small or isolated rural town residents than urban residents; in the more rural states, it was greater. Rural enrollees also used VHA hospitals more than urban enrollees if they lived in the South, but they used VHA hospitals less in other states. Findings were consistent across principal diagnoses, except that in every state, rural veterans were hospitalized less often for mental disorders but more for respiratory diseases. Logistic regressions controlling several covariates consistently showed that very rural enrollees relied on VHA hospitals more than urban enrollees. Vouchers would likely increase non-VHA use more in states with greater rural populations. CONCLUSIONS: Vouchers for non-VHA inpatient care might have greater impact in rural states.
PURPOSE: To understand how vouchers for non-VHA care of VHA-enrolled veterans might affect rural enrollees, we determined how much enrollees use VHA and non-VHA inpatient care, and whether this use varies substantially between rural and urban residents depending on state of residence. METHODS: For veterans listed in the 2007 VHA enrollment file as living in Arizona, Iowa, Louisiana, Tennessee, Florida, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, or New York, we merged 2004-2007 administrative discharge data for all VHA hospitalizations with all non-VHA hospitalizations listed in state health department or hospital association databases. Within states, rural and urban residents (RUCA-defined) were compared on VHA and non-VHA hospitalization rates, overall and for major diagnostic categories. FINDINGS: Non-VHA hospital use was much greater than VHA use, though it also was more variable across states. In states with higher proportions of urban enrollees, use of non-VHA hospitals was lower for small or isolated rural town residents than urban residents; in the more rural states, it was greater. Rural enrollees also used VHA hospitals more than urban enrollees if they lived in the South, but they used VHA hospitals less in other states. Findings were consistent across principal diagnoses, except that in every state, rural veterans were hospitalized less often for mental disorders but more for respiratory diseases. Logistic regressions controlling several covariates consistently showed that very rural enrollees relied on VHA hospitals more than urban enrollees. Vouchers would likely increase non-VHA use more in states with greater rural populations. CONCLUSIONS: Vouchers for non-VHA inpatient care might have greater impact in rural states.
Authors: George G Sayre; Emily L Neely; Carol E Simons; Christine A Sulc; David H Au; P Michael Ho Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Warren B P Pettey; Marjorie E Carter; Emily Brignone; Andrew Redd; Ying Suo; Guy Divita; Rebecca K Blais; Jamison D Fargo; Adi V Gundlapalli Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2020-03-04
Authors: Bonnie M Vest; Jessica A Kulak; D Lynn Homish; Rachel A Hoopsick; Gregory G Homish Journal: Psychol Health Med Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.898
Authors: Rolando Sanchez; Yunshu Zhou; Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin; Peter J Kaboli; Mary Charlton; Richard M Hoffman Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2020-05-30 Impact factor: 4.333