| Literature DB >> 30036947 |
Krzysztof Kilian1, Łukasz Cheda2, Mateusz Sitarz3,4, Katarzyna Szkliniarz5, Jarosław Choiński6, Anna Stolarz7.
Abstract
The rapid increase in applications of scandium isotopes in nuclear medicine requires new efficient production routes for these radioisotopes. Recently, irradiations of calcium in cyclotrons by α, deuteron, and proton beams have been used. Therefore, effective post-irradiation separation and preconcentration of the radioactive scandium from the calcium matrix are important to obtain the pure final product in a relatively small volume. Nobias resin was used as a sorbent for effective separation of 44Sc from calcium targets. Separation was performed at pH 3 using a column containing 10 mg of resin. Scandium was eluted with 100 μL of 2 mol L-1 HCl. Particular attention was paid to the reduction of calcium concentration, presence of metallic impurities, robustness and simple automation. 44Sc was separated with 94.9 ± 2.8% yield, with results in the range of 91.7⁻99.0%. Purity of the eluate was confirmed with ICP-OES determination of metallic impurities and >99% chelation efficiency with DOTATATE, followed by >36 h radiochemical stability of the complex. A wide range of optimal conditions and robustness to target variability and suspended matter facilitates the proposed method in automatic systems for scandium isotope separation and synthesis of scandium-labeled radiopharmaceuticals.Entities:
Keywords: DOTATATE; radiochemical separation; scandium-44; solid target processing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30036947 PMCID: PMC6100303 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The effect of pH on the sorption of 44Sc(III) ions on 10 mg Nobias resin and precipitation on a 0.22 μm filter.
Figure 2The effect of pH on the desorption of 44Sc(III) ions with 2 mol L−1 HCl on 10 mg Nobias resin and precipitation on a 0.22 μm filter.
Comparison of the methods used for separation of scandium radioisotopes from calcium carbonate targets.
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DGA + Dowex 50 | 75 | 1 mol L−1 NH4OAc/1500 | Pb < 0.7, Al < 1, Zn < 1, Cu < 0.02 | [ |
| DGA + SCX | 93 | NaCl/HCl/700 | ||
| UTEVA | 80 | H2O/400 | N/A | [ |
| Chelex 100 | 70 | 1 mol L−1 HCl/500 | N/A | [ |
| DGA | 88 ± 3 | 0.1 mol L−1 HCl/10,000 | Fe 1.14, Al 1.14 | [ |
| UTEVA | 80 ± 4 | H2O/1 mol L−1 HCl/400 | Ca 82, Fe 5.2, Zn 4.7, Ni 29, Al. 6.4, Mn 2.0 | [ |
| DGA + SCX | 89.7 ± 3.1 | 4.8 mol L−1 NaCl + 0.13 mol L−1 HCl/700 | N/A | [ |
| Nobias | 94.9 ± 2.8 | 2 mol L−1 HCl/100 | Al 0.009, Ca 0.34, Cu 0.02, Fe 0.005, Mn 0.014, Ni 0.013, Pb 0.03, Zn 0.03 | This work |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.22 μm filter | 96 | 0.5 mol L−1 HCl/N/A | Ca < 1, Fe 0.07 | [ |
| 0.22 μm filter | 93.6 ± 3.9 | 6 mol L−1 HCl/3000 | N/A | [ |
Figure 3Scheme of the separation module. V1–V4—switching valves.
Figure 4Flowchart of operations for target processing and scandium separation.