Literature DB >> 30034060

Learning Optimal Personalized Treatment Rules in Consideration of Benefit and Risk: with an Application to Treating Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Insulin Therapies.

Yuanjia Wang1, Haoda Fu2, Donglin Zeng3.   

Abstract

Individualized medical decision making is often complex due to patient treatment response heterogeneity. Pharmacotherapy may exhibit distinct efficacy and safety profiles for different patient populations. An "optimal" treatment that maximizes clinical benefit for a patient may also lead to concern of safety due to a high risk of adverse events. Thus, to guide individualized clinical decision making and deliver optimal tailored treatments, maximizing clinical benefit should be considered in the context of controlling for potential risk. In this work, we propose two approaches to identify personalized optimal treatment strategy that maximizes clinical benefit under a constraint on the average risk. We derive the theoretical optimal treatment rule under the risk constraint and draw an analogy to the Neyman-Pearson lemma to prove the theorem. We present algorithms that can be easily implemented by any off-the-shelf quadratic programming package. We conduct extensive simulation studies to show satisfactory risk control when maximizing the clinical benefit. Lastly, we apply our method to a randomized trial of type 2 diabetes patients to guide optimal utilization of the first line insulin treatments based on individual patient characteristics while controlling for the rate of hypoglycemia events. We identify baseline glycated hemoglobin level, body mass index, and fasting blood glucose as three key factors among 18 biomarkers to differentiate treatment assignments, and demonstrate a successful control of the risk of hypoglycemia in both the training and testing data set.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benefit Risk Analysis; Hypoglycemia; Machine Learning; Neyman-Pearson Lemma; Personalized Medicine

Year:  2017        PMID: 30034060      PMCID: PMC6051551          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1303386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  28 in total

1.  Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian; Peggy H Wong; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

Review 5.  Diabetes in older people: new insights and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Alan Sinclair; Trisha Dunning; Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 32.069

6.  A Bayesian approach to evaluating net clinical benefit allowed for parameter uncertainty.

Authors:  Alexander J Sutton; Nicola J Cooper; Keith R Abrams; Paul C Lambert; David R Jones
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  The DURABLE trial study design: comparing the safety, efficacy, and durability of insulin glargine to insulin lispro mix 75/25 added to oral antihyperglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jessie Fahrbach; Scott Jacober; Honghua Jiang; Sherry Martin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09

8.  Patient-specific dose finding based on bivariate outcomes and covariates.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Silvio E Inzucchi; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse; Michaela Diamant; Ele Ferrannini; Michael Nauck; Anne L Peters; Apostolos Tsapas; Richard Wender; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  18 in total

1.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Michael R Kosorok; Eric B Laber
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Designing precision medicine trials to yield a greater population impact.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Michael L LeBlanc
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Risk controlled decision trees and random forests for precision Medicine.

Authors:  Kevin Doubleday; Jin Zhou; Hua Zhou; Haoda Fu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Learning-based biomarker-assisted rules for optimized clinical benefit under a risk constraint.

Authors:  Yanqing Wang; Ying-Qi Zhao; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Constructing dynamic treatment regimes with shared parameters for censored data.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Ruoqing Zhu; Guanhua Chen; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Bayesian Nonparametric Policy Search with Application to Periodontal Recall Intervals.

Authors:  Qian Guan; Brian J Reich; Eric B Laber; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Estimating the optimal individualized treatment rule from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

Authors:  Yizhe Xu; Tom H Greene; Adam P Bress; Brian C Sauer; Brandon K Bellows; Yue Zhang; William S Weintraub; Andrew E Moran; Jincheng Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  On restricted optimal treatment regime estimation for competing risks data.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Jiajia Zhang; Wenbin Lu; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Deep transfer learning and data augmentation improve glucose levels prediction in type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Yixiang Deng; Lu Lu; Laura Aponte; Angeliki M Angelidi; Vera Novak; George Em Karniadakis; Christos S Mantzoros
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-07-14

10.  Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Haomiao Meng; Ying-Qi Zhao; Haoda Fu; Xingye Qiao
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.