Literature DB >> 30034023

The Need for Nuance in the Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Debate.

Olle Häggström1.   

Abstract

Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) provides an important statistical toolbox, but there are a number of ways in which it is often abused and misinterpreted, with bad consequences for the reliability and progress of science. Parts of contemporary NHST debate, especially in the psychological sciences, is reviewed, and a suggestion is made that a new distinction between strongly, weakly, and very weakly anti-NHST positions is likely to bring added clarity to the debate.

Keywords:  hypothesis testing; p value; statistics

Year:  2016        PMID: 30034023      PMCID: PMC5991794          DOI: 10.1177/0013164416668233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  8 in total

1.  Bayesian data analysis.

Authors:  John K Kruschke
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-04-28

2.  Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Evelyne Decullier; Véronique Lhéritier; François Chapuis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-20

4.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  "Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Change in paternal grandmothers' early food supply influenced cardiovascular mortality of the female grandchildren.

Authors:  Lars Olov Bygren; Petter Tinghög; John Carstensen; Sören Edvinsson; Gunnar Kaati; Marcus E Pembrey; Michael Sjöström
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals.

Authors:  Richard D Morey; Rink Hoekstra; Jeffrey N Rouder; Michael D Lee; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Frequentist versus Bayesian approaches to multiple testing.

Authors:  Arvid Sjölander; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Multiple comparisons controversies are about context and costs, not frequentism versus Bayesianism.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 8.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.