Yingying Qi1, Jing Lin1, Lin Leng1, Guiqiu Zhao2, Qing Wang1, Cui Li1, Liting Hu1. 1. From the Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China. 2. From the Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China. Electronic address: zhaoguiqiu_good@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual quality of patients with different angle κ sizes after a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Patients who had phacoemulsification with the implantation of the trifocal IOL AT LISA tri 839MP were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the size of the preoperative angle κ. Monocular far, intermediate, and near uncorrected visual acuities were measured during a 3-month follow-up. Other outcome measurements taken were the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, the Strehl ratio, and objective scatter index. All the patients completed a subjective questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The study comprised 89 patients (89 eyes). The 3 groups showed statistically significant differences in the incidence of glare and halo after their surgery. There were no significant differences in the following variables: uncorrected far, intermediate, and near visual acuities, MTF cutoff, Strehl ratio, and spectacle independence. There was a significant difference in the MTF cutoff and Strehl ratio between the patients with the largest and the smallest angle κ. CONCLUSIONS: The patients' postoperative far, intermediate, and near vision was not affected by their angle κ. However, when angle κ was greater than 0.4 mm, the incidence of glare and halo increased and when it was greater than 0.5 mm, patients' visual quality decreased. In clinical work, for patients with a larger angle κ, the choice to implant a trifocal IOL should be carefully evaluated.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual quality of patients with different angle κ sizes after a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS:Patients who had phacoemulsification with the implantation of the trifocal IOL AT LISA tri 839MP were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the size of the preoperative angle κ. Monocular far, intermediate, and near uncorrected visual acuities were measured during a 3-month follow-up. Other outcome measurements taken were the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, the Strehl ratio, and objective scatter index. All the patients completed a subjective questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The study comprised 89 patients (89 eyes). The 3 groups showed statistically significant differences in the incidence of glare and halo after their surgery. There were no significant differences in the following variables: uncorrected far, intermediate, and near visual acuities, MTF cutoff, Strehl ratio, and spectacle independence. There was a significant difference in the MTF cutoff and Strehl ratio between the patients with the largest and the smallest angle κ. CONCLUSIONS: The patients' postoperative far, intermediate, and near vision was not affected by their angle κ. However, when angle κ was greater than 0.4 mm, the incidence of glare and halo increased and when it was greater than 0.5 mm, patients' visual quality decreased. In clinical work, for patients with a larger angle κ, the choice to implant a trifocal IOL should be carefully evaluated.
Authors: Philipp B Baenninger; Janosch Rinert; Lucas M Bachmann; Katja C Iselin; Frantisek Sanak; Oliver Pfaeffli; Claude Kaufmann; Michael A Thiel Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 3.117