Literature DB >> 28829646

What Are the Environmental Determinants of Phenotypic Selection? A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies.

Christina M Caruso, Ryan A Martin, Nina Sletvold, Michael B Morrissey, Michael J Wade, Kate E Augustine, Stephanie M Carlson, Andrew D C MacColl, Adam M Siepielski, Joel G Kingsolver.   

Abstract

Although many selection estimates have been published, the environmental factors that cause selection to vary in space and time have rarely been identified. One way to identify these factors is by experimentally manipulating the environment and measuring selection in each treatment. We compiled and analyzed selection estimates from experimental studies. First, we tested whether the effect of manipulating the environment on selection gradients depends on taxon, trait type, or fitness component. We found that the effect of manipulating the environment was larger when selection was measured on life-history traits or via survival. Second, we tested two predictions about the environmental factors that cause variation in selection. We found support for the prediction that variation in selection is more likely to be caused by environmental factors that have a large effect on mean fitness but not for the prediction that variation is more likely to be caused by biotic factors. Third, we compared selection gradients from experimental and observational studies. We found that selection varied more among treatments in experimental studies than among spatial and temporal replicates in observational studies, suggesting that experimental studies can detect relationships between environmental factors and selection that would not be apparent in observational studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causes of selection; directional selection; fitness; natural selection; selection gradient

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28829646     DOI: 10.1086/692760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  15 in total

1.  Limited scope for reproductive senescence in wild populations of a short-lived fish.

Authors:  Milan Vrtílek; Jakub Žák; Radim Blažek; Matej Polačik; Alessandro Cellerino; Martin Reichard
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-11-22

Review 2.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Authors:  Brendan L McEwen; James L L Lichtenstein; David N Fisher; Colin M Wright; Greg T Chism; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Natural selection fluctuates at an extremely fine spatial scale inside a wild population of snapdragon plants.

Authors:  Pascal Marrot; Mathieu Latutrie; Jésaëlle Piquet; Benoit Pujol
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 5.  Human influences on the strength of phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Vincent Fugère; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Multivariate phenotypic divergence along an urbanization gradient.

Authors:  James S Santangelo; L Ruth Rivkin; Carole Advenard; Ken A Thompson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient.

Authors:  Viktoriia Radchuk; Thomas Reed; Céline Teplitsky; Martijn van de Pol; Anne Charmantier; Christopher Hassall; Peter Adamík; Frank Adriaensen; Markus P Ahola; Peter Arcese; Jesús Miguel Avilés; Javier Balbontin; Karl S Berg; Antoni Borras; Sarah Burthe; Jean Clobert; Nina Dehnhard; Florentino de Lope; André A Dhondt; Niels J Dingemanse; Hideyuki Doi; Tapio Eeva; Joerns Fickel; Iolanda Filella; Frode Fossøy; Anne E Goodenough; Stephen J G Hall; Bengt Hansson; Michael Harris; Dennis Hasselquist; Thomas Hickler; Jasmin Joshi; Heather Kharouba; Juan Gabriel Martínez; Jean-Baptiste Mihoub; James A Mills; Mercedes Molina-Morales; Arne Moksnes; Arpat Ozgul; Deseada Parejo; Philippe Pilard; Maud Poisbleau; Francois Rousset; Mark-Oliver Rödel; David Scott; Juan Carlos Senar; Constanti Stefanescu; Bård G Stokke; Tamotsu Kusano; Maja Tarka; Corey E Tarwater; Kirsten Thonicke; Jack Thorley; Andreas Wilting; Piotr Tryjanowski; Juha Merilä; Ben C Sheldon; Anders Pape Møller; Erik Matthysen; Fredric Janzen; F Stephen Dobson; Marcel E Visser; Steven R Beissinger; Alexandre Courtiol; Stephanie Kramer-Schadt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology.

Authors:  Julie Gauzere; Bertrand Teuf; Hendrik Davi; Luis-Miguel Chevin; Thomas Caignard; Bérangère Leys; Sylvain Delzon; Ophélie Ronce; Isabelle Chuine
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-03-10

9.  Selection on heritable social network positions is context-dependent in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Eric Wesley Wice; Julia Barbara Saltz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Geographic patterns of seed trait variation in an invasive species: how much can close populations differ?

Authors:  Erola Fenollosa; Laia Jené; Sergi Munné-Bosch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.