Literature DB >> 30032249

Effect of parity and stage of gestation on growth and feed efficiency of gestating sows.

Lori L Thomas1, Robert D Goodband1, Mike D Tokach1, Jason C Woodworth1, Joel M DeRouchey1, Steve S Dritz2.   

Abstract

The effects of parity and stage of gestation on female growth criteria, and reproductive performance were evaluated on a commercial sow farm. A total of 712 females (Camborough, PIC, Hendersonville, TN) were group-housed and individually fed with electronic sow feeders. Gilts (parity 1) and sows were offered 2.0 and 2.26 kg of feed per day (4.7 and 5.3 Mcal NE per day), respectively. Females were moved from the breeding stall to pens on day 5 of gestation. A scale was located in the alleyway after sows left individual feeding stations. Feed intake and BW were recorded daily throughout gestation generating values for ADFI, ADG, and G:F for each sow. Data were divided into 3 parity groups: 1, 2, and 3+ and gestation was divided into 3 periods: day 5 to 39, 40 to 74, and 75 to 109. From day 5 to 39, ADFI was decreased (P < 0.05) for parity 3+ sows compared to the other periods of gestation. Parity 2 sows, although provided the same feed allowance, had greater (P < 0.05) ADFI during the first period of gestation than parity 3+ sows. Parity 1 and 2 sow ADG increased (P < 0.05) from day 39 to 74 of gestation, then decreased (P < 0.05) from day 74 to 109 of gestation. Parity 3+ sow ADG increased (P < 0.05) in each subsequent period of gestation. Parity 1 sows had the greatest (P < 0.05) ADG in comparison to parity 2 and 3+ sows in each period of gestation. Regardless of parity group, G:F was poorest (P < 0.05) from day 5 to 39 of gestation compared with sequential periods of gestation. Parity 1 sow G:F was greater (P < 0.05) than parity 2 and 3+ sows for all periods of gestation. Backfat gain indicated that parity 1 sows maintained backfat (approximately 18 mm) while parity 2 and 3+ sows gained (P < 0.05) approximately 1 mm backfat throughout gestation. Total born was greatest (P < 0.05) for parity 3+ sows with parity 1 sows marginally greater (P < 0.10) than parity 2 sows. Although there was statistical evidence (P < 0.001) for a positive correlation between BW gain and total born in parities 1 (r = 0.23; P = < 0.001), 2 (r = 0.15; P = 0.035), and 3+ (r = 0.29; P < 0.001), these correlations are very weak. Overall, this study indicates that parity 1 sows have the greatest G:F in gestation and that there is a lack of evidence for strong correlations between feed intake, growth, and reproductive performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30032249      PMCID: PMC6162567          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Effect of sow parity and weight at service on target maternal weight and energy for gain in gestation.

Authors:  M G Young; M D Tokach; F X Aherne; R G Main; S S Dritz; R D Goodband; J L Nelssen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance.

Authors:  M G Young; M D Tokach; F X Aherne; R G Main; S S Dritz; R D Goodband; J L Nelssen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Changes in weight and composition in various tissues of pregnant gilts and their nutritional implications.

Authors:  F Ji; G Wu; J R Blanton; S W Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Age, body weight and backfat thickness at first observed oestrus in crossbred Landrace x Yorkshire gilts, seasonal variations and their influence on subsequence reproductive performance.

Authors:  P Tummaruk; W Tantasuparuk; M Techakumphu; A Kunavongkrit
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 2.145

5.  Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance.

Authors:  P H Hemsworth; M Rice; J Nash; K Giri; K L Butler; A J Tilbrook; R S Morrison
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Energy utilization in pregnant and lactating sows: modeling of energy requirements.

Authors:  J Noblet; J Y Dourmad; M Etienne
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Partitioning components of maternal growth to determine efficiency of feed use in gestating sows.

Authors:  Lori L Thomas; Robert D Goodband; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Improving efficiency of sow productivity: nutrition and health.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kim; Alexandra C Weaver; Yan Bin Shen; Yan Zhao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-26
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Partitioning components of maternal growth to determine efficiency of feed use in gestating sows.

Authors:  Lori L Thomas; Robert D Goodband; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Impact of feed intake in early gestation on maternal growth and litter size according to body reserves at weaning of young parity sows.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Gabriela S Oliveira; Rafael R Ulguim; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Mari L Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Márcio A D Gonçalves; Ricardo J Cogo; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Maternal nutrition during early and late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impacts on maternal growth and litter traits1.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Deivison P Fagundes; Carlos E Vier; Gabriela S Oliveira; Ana P G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Mari L Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Ricardo J Cogo; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Precision feeding gestating sows: effects on offspring growth performance and carcass and loin quality at slaughter.

Authors:  Lauren L Hansen; Victoria Stewart; Ira B Mandell; Lee-Anne Huber
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-09

5.  Feed intake and feeding behavior traits for gestating sows recorded using electronic sow feeders.

Authors:  Laura Vargovic; Susanne Hermesch; Rebecca Z Athorn; Kim L Bunter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.