Literature DB >> 23893983

Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance.

P H Hemsworth1, M Rice, J Nash, K Giri, K L Butler, A J Tilbrook, R S Morrison.   

Abstract

A total of 3,120 sows, in 4 time replicates, were used to determine the effects of group size and floor space on sow welfare using behavioral, physiological, health, and fitness variables. Within 1 to 7 d postinsemination, sows were assigned randomly to treatments of a 3 by 6 factorial arrangement, with 3 group sizes (10, 30, or 80 sows/pen) and 6 floor space allowances (1.4, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, or 3.0 m(2)/sow). Sows were housed on partially slatted concrete floors, and overhead feeders delivered 4 times/day to provide a total of 2.5 kg of feed/sow. As pen space increased from 1.4 to 3.0 m(2)/sow, aggression at feeding decreased from about 9 to 7 bouts/sow (linear, P = 0.029) and plasma cortisol concentrations decreased from about 28 to 21 ng/mL (linear, P = 0.0089) at 2 d. Although the results are in accord with a linear decline from 1.4 to 3 m(2)/sow, the results are also in accord with a decline in these measurements from 1.4 to 1.8 m(2)/sow and no further decline greater than 1.8 m(2)/sow. Farrowing rate (percentage of inseminated sows that farrowed) also increased from about 60 to 75% as space increased from 1.4 to 3.0 m(2)/sow (linear, P = 0.012). Group size was related to skin injuries on d 9 (P = 0.0017), 23 (P = 0.0046), and 51 (P = 0.0006), with groups of 10 consistently having the lowest number of total injuries over this period. Based on the aggression and cortisol results, it is credible to judge that, within the range of floor space allowances studied, sow welfare improves with increased space. However, from a sow welfare perspective, the experiment had insufficient precision to determine what is an adequate space allowance for sows. Thus, although the results definitely support a space allowance of 1.4 m(2)/sow being too small, it is not possible to give guidance on an actual space allowance at mixing that is adequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23893983     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Effect of parity and stage of gestation on growth and feed efficiency of gestating sows.

Authors:  Lori L Thomas; Robert D Goodband; Mike D Tokach; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Steve S Dritz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Minimal floor space allowance for gestating sows kept in pens with electronic sow feeders on fully slatted floors.

Authors:  Yuzhi Z Li; Shiquan Q Cui; Xiaojian J Yang; Lee J Johnston; Samuel K Baidoo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Aggression and cortisol levels in three different group housing routines for lactating sows.

Authors:  Ola Thomsson; Ann-Sofi Bergqvist; Ylva Sjunnesson; Lena Eliasson-Selling; Nils Lundeheim; Ulf Magnusson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Housing of Cull Sows in the Hours before Transport to the Abattoir-An Initial Description of Sow Behaviour While Waiting in a Transfer Vehicle.

Authors:  Mette S Herskin; Katrine K Fogsgaard; Ditte Erichsen; Mia Bonnichsen; Charlotte Gaillard; Karen Thodberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Floor Feeding Sows Their Daily Allocation over Multiple Drops per Day Does Not Result in More Equitable Feeding Opportunities in Later Drops.

Authors:  Megan Verdon; Natalia Zegarra; Rutu Achayra; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Social network analysis in pigs: impacts of significant dyads on general network and centrality parameters.

Authors:  K Büttner; I Czycholl; K Mees; J Krieter
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Effect of Different Feeding Systems on Salivary Cortisol Levels during Gestation in Sows on Herd Level.

Authors:  Ida Bahnsen; Kristina V Riddersholm; Leonardo V de Knegt; Thomas S Bruun; Charlotte Amdi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  The Role of Genetic Selection on Agonistic Behavior and Welfare of Gestating Sows Housed in Large Semi-Static Groups.

Authors:  Sophie Brajon; Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire; Nicolas Devillers; Frédéric Guay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Risk Factors for Chronic Stress in Sows Housed in Groups, and Associated Risks of Prenatal Stress in Their Offspring.

Authors:  Martyna Ewa Lagoda; Joanna Marchewka; Keelin O'Driscoll; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-12

10.  Effects of Gestational Housing on Reproductive Performance and Behavior of Sows with Different Backfat Thickness.

Authors:  K H Kim; A Hosseindoust; S L Ingale; S H Lee; H S Noh; Y H Choi; S M Jeon; Y H Kim; B J Chae
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.