Robert Scragg1, Kay-Tee Khaw2, Les Toop3, John Sluyter1, Carlene M M Lawes1, Debbie Waayer1, Edward Giovannucci4,5, Carlos A Camargo6. 1. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. Department of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Public Health & General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. 4. Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Abstract
Importance: Previous randomized clinical trials have reported inconsistent results on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cancer incidence. Objective: To examine whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation received monthly, without calcium, is associated with a reduction in cancer incidence and cancer mortality in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a post hoc analysis of data from the Vitamin D Assessment (ViDA) study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recruited participants from family practices and community groups in Auckland, New Zealand, from April 5, 2011, through November 6, 2012, with follow-up completed December 31, 2015. Participants were adult community residents aged 50 to 84 years. Of 47 905 adults invited from family practices and 163 from community groups, 5110 participants were randomized to receive vitamin D3 (n = 2558) or placebo (n = 2552). Two participants withdrew consent, and all others (n = 5108) were included in the primary analysis. Data analysis was by intention to treat. Interventions: Oral vitamin D3, in an initial bolus dose of 200 000 IU and followed by monthly doses of 100 000 IU, or placebo for a median of 3.3 years (range, 2.5-4.2 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Post hoc primary outcome was the number of all primary invasive and in situ malignant neoplasms (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) diagnosed from randomization until the study medication was discontinued on July 31, 2015. Results: Of the 5108 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (8.3) years, 58.1% were male, and 4253 (83.3%) were of European or another race/ethnicity, with the remainder being Polynesian or South Asian. Mean (SD) baseline deseasonalized 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 26.5 (9.0) ng/mL. In a random sample of 438 participants, the mean follow-up 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration consistently was greater than 20 ng/mL higher in the vitamin D group than in the placebo group. The primary outcome of cancer comprised 328 total cases of cancer (259 invasive and 69 in situ malignant neoplasms) and occurred in 165 of 2558 participants (6.5%) in the vitamin D group and 163 of 2550 (6.4%) in the placebo group, yielding an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.81-1.25; P = .95). Conclusions and Relevance: High-dose vitamin D supplementation prescribed monthly for up to 4 years without calcium may not prevent cancer. This study suggests that daily or weekly dosing for a longer period may require further study. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000402943.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Previous randomized clinical trials have reported inconsistent results on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cancer incidence. Objective: To examine whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation received monthly, without calcium, is associated with a reduction in cancer incidence and cancer mortality in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a post hoc analysis of data from the Vitamin D Assessment (ViDA) study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recruited participants from family practices and community groups in Auckland, New Zealand, from April 5, 2011, through November 6, 2012, with follow-up completed December 31, 2015. Participants were adult community residents aged 50 to 84 years. Of 47 905 adults invited from family practices and 163 from community groups, 5110 participants were randomized to receive vitamin D3 (n = 2558) or placebo (n = 2552). Two participants withdrew consent, and all others (n = 5108) were included in the primary analysis. Data analysis was by intention to treat. Interventions: Oral vitamin D3, in an initial bolus dose of 200 000 IU and followed by monthly doses of 100 000 IU, or placebo for a median of 3.3 years (range, 2.5-4.2 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Post hoc primary outcome was the number of all primary invasive and in situ malignant neoplasms (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) diagnosed from randomization until the study medication was discontinued on July 31, 2015. Results: Of the 5108 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (8.3) years, 58.1% were male, and 4253 (83.3%) were of European or another race/ethnicity, with the remainder being Polynesian or South Asian. Mean (SD) baseline deseasonalized 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 26.5 (9.0) ng/mL. In a random sample of 438 participants, the mean follow-up 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration consistently was greater than 20 ng/mL higher in the vitamin D group than in the placebo group. The primary outcome of cancer comprised 328 total cases of cancer (259 invasive and 69 in situ malignant neoplasms) and occurred in 165 of 2558 participants (6.5%) in the vitamin D group and 163 of 2550 (6.4%) in the placebo group, yielding an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.81-1.25; P = .95). Conclusions and Relevance: High-dose vitamin D supplementation prescribed monthly for up to 4 years without calcium may not prevent cancer. This study suggests that daily or weekly dosing for a longer period may require further study. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000402943.
Authors: Jung Eun Lee; Haojie Li; Andrew T Chan; Bruce W Hollis; I-Min Lee; Meir J Stampfer; Kana Wu; Edward Giovannucci; Jing Ma Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-03-23
Authors: Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Edward Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Thomas Dietrich; Bess Dawson-Hughes Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Joan Lappe; Patrice Watson; Dianne Travers-Gustafson; Robert Recker; Cedric Garland; Edward Gorham; Keith Baggerly; Sharon L McDonnell Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joan M Lappe; Dianne Travers-Gustafson; K Michael Davies; Robert R Recker; Robert P Heaney Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Rowan T Chlebowski; Karen C Johnson; Charles Kooperberg; Mary Pettinger; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Tom Rohan; Jacques Rossouw; Dorothy Lane; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Shagufta Yasmeen; Robert A Hiatt; James M Shikany; Mara Vitolins; Janu Khandekar; F Allan Hubbell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Katherine D Crew; Garnet L Anderson; Dawn L Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Parisa Tehranifar; Danika L Lew; Monica Yee; Eric A Brown; Sebastien S Kairouz; Nafisa Kuwajerwala; Therese Bevers; John E Doster; Corrine Zarwan; Laura Kruper; Lori M Minasian; Leslie Ford; Banu Arun; Marian Neuhouser; Gary E Goodman; Powel H Brown Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2019-05-28
Authors: James C Fleet; Pavlo L Kovalenko; Yan Li; Justin Smolinski; Colleen Spees; Jun-Ge Yu; Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner; Min Cui; Antonio Neme; Carsten Carlberg; Steven K Clinton Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2019-04-26
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; William Christen; Shari S Bassuk; Samia Mora; Heike Gibson; David Gordon; Trisha Copeland; Denise D'Agostino; Georgina Friedenberg; Claire Ridge; Vadim Bubes; Edward L Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Julie E Buring Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245