| Literature DB >> 30027075 |
Marcio de Castro Ferreira1, Julio Cesar Pinto Oliveira1, Flavio Ferreira Zidan1, Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi1, Marcus Vinicius Malheiros Luzo1, Rene Jorge Abdalla1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the number of hospital permits for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Brazil between 2008 and 2015, and correlate them with regional, national, and international demographic and epidemiological aspects.Entities:
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Hip; Knee
Year: 2018 PMID: 30027075 PMCID: PMC6052187 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Number of AHAs for TKA and THA between 2008 and 2015 in Brazilian states and the proportion of arthroplasties per elderly individuals, mean length of hospitalization, mortality rate, and ranking.
| Indexes states | AHA/TKA | AHA/THA | Regional percentage TKA; THA | Regional percentage of elderly | Proportion elderly/TKA – yearly | Proportion elderly/THA – yearly | Period of hospitalization TKA; THA | Mortality Rate TKA; THA | National ranking TKA; THA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rondônia | 98 | 150 | 7.8%; 13.0% | 10.6% | 7789 | 5193 | 3.4; 27.4 | 0.0; 4.0 | 21st; 22nd |
| Acre | 170 | 120 | 13.5%; 10.4% | 4.5% | 1953 | 2766 | 4.9; 5.2 | 0.0; 0.0 | 6th; 14th |
| Amazonas | 350 | 220 | 27.8%; 19.1% | 18.9% | 3939 | 6270 | 7.5; 12.5 | 0.0; 0.91 | 11th; 23rd |
| Roraima | 61 | 51 | 4.8%; 4.4% | 2.3% | 2780 | 3228 | 4.0; 5.1 | 0.0; 0.0 | 10th; 18th |
| Para | 468 | 402 | 37.2%; 34.9% | 48.7% | 7592 | 8842 | 5.8; 8.8 | 0.43; 1.0 | 19th; 25th |
| Amapá | 0 | 33 | 0%; 2.8% | 3.3% | 0 | 7494 | 0.0; 9.3 | 0.0; 1.0 | 27th; 24th |
| Tocantins | 109 | 175 | 8.6%; 15.2% | 11.4% | 7647 | 4774 | 4.3; 11.0 | 0.92; 1.71 | 20th; 20th |
| Maranhão | 139 | 318 | 3.7%; 2.6% | 10.6% | 27,617 | 12,071 | 5.3; 10.5 | 0.72; 10.5 | 26th; 27th |
| Piauí | 315 | 619 | 8.4%; 5.0% | 6.1% | 6981 | 3552 | 6.2; 8.7 | 0.0; 8.7 | 17th; 19th |
| Ceara | 221 | 2306 | 5.9%; 18.8% | 16.1% | 26,309 | 2521 | 6.8; 8.9 | 0.0; 8.9 | 25th; 13th |
| Rio Grande Norte | 415 | 1623 | 11.1%; 13.3% | 6.3% | 5470 | 1397 | 4.9; 7.5 | 0.0; 7.5 | 15th; 9th |
| Paraíba | 252 | 908 | 6.7%; 7.4% | 7.9% | 11,318 | 3141 | 5.2; 11.8 | 0.40; 11.8 | 24th; 17th |
| Pernambuco | 872 | 2780 | 23.3%; 22.7% | 16.9% | 7004 | 2197 | 4.4; 9.8 | 0.34; 9.8 | 18th; 11th |
| Alagoas | 362 | 208 | 9.6%; 1.7% | 5.1% | 5102 | 8879 | 5.8; 6.1 | 0.0; 6.1 | 13th; 26th |
| Sergipe | 248 | 254 | 6.6%; 2.0% | 4.0% | 4932 | 4816 | 4.2; 4.4 | 0.40; 4.4 | 12th; 21st |
| Bahia | 910 | 3188 | 24.3%; 26.1% | 27.2% | 10,784 | 3078 | 3.7; 9.1 | 0.11; 9.1 | 23rd; 16th |
| Minas Gerais | 6581 | 11,920 | 24.4%; 24,% | 26.3% | 2120 | 1170 | 3.7; 5.9 | 0.14; 1.83 | 8th; 6th |
| Espirito Santo | 1884 | 1173 | 6.9%; 2.4% | 3.7% | 1060 | 1707 | 3.3; 5.1 | 0.21; 0.60 | 1st; 10th |
| Rio de Janeiro | 5709 | 9420 | 21.1%; 19.2% | 20.9% | 2502 | 1176 | 6.3; 9.8 | 0.16; 1.60 | 9th; 7th |
| São Paulo | 12,793 | 26,300 | 47.4%; 53.8% | 49.0% | 2030 | 987 | 4.5; 6.7 | 0.24; 2.62 | 7th; 5th |
| Paraná | 4760 | 8649 | 34.5%; 32.5% | 35.3% | 1544 | 850 | 4.0; 5.2 | 0.25; 1.75 | 3rd; 3rd |
| Santa Catarina | 3277 | 4846 | 23.7%; 18.2% | 20.1% | 1278 | 864 | 4.7; 5.9 | 0.21; 1.09 | 2nd; 4th |
| Rio Grande Sul | 5739 | 13,078 | 41.6%; 49.2% | 44.5% | 1614 | 709 | 4.8; 6.7 | 0.09; 1.06 | 4th; 2nd |
| Mato Grosso | 159 | 703 | 10.2; 12.0% | 17.6% | 10,459 | 2831 | 5.0; 6.1 | 0.90; 1.14 | 22th; 15th |
| Mato Grosso Sul | 223 | 509 | 14.3 (8.7%) | 20.3% | 6463 | 2365 | 5.1; 8.4 | 0.63; 3.14 | 16th; 12th |
| Goiás | 503 | 2908 | 32.3%; 49.9% | 47.8% | 5380 | 1343 | 4.9; 6.0 | 0.40; 2.85 | 14th; 8th |
| Distrito Federal | 671 | 1706 | 43.1%; 29.2% | 14.4% | 1719 | 676 | 8.4; 13.5 | 0.15; 0.94 | 5th; 1st |
Number of authorizations for hospital admission for total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasties in Brazil and regions.
| Region | North TKA; THA | Northeast TKA; THA | Southeast TKA; THA | South TKA; THA | Midwest TKA; THA | Brazil TKA; THA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 49; 126 | 268; 1500 | 2269; 4939 | 1307; 3279 | 135; 538 | 4028; 10,382 |
| 2009 | 191; 100 | 342; 1511 | 2864; 5507 | 1303; 3252 | 194; 622 | 4894; 10,992 |
| 2010 | 146; 114 | 476; 1600 | 3147; 5817 | 1421; 3187 | 160; 742 | 5350; 11,460 |
| 2011 | 144; 113 | 519; 1632 | 3339; 6118 | 1728; 3176 | 167; 655 | 5898; 11,694 |
| 2012 | 143; 113 | 490; 1472 | 3368; 6254 | 1651; 3041 | 176; 641 | 5828; 11,521 |
| 2013 | 188; 164 | 625; 1529 | 3813; 6817 | 2090; 3357 | 254; 819 | 6970; 12,686 |
| 2014 | 177; 208 | 564; 1519 | 4082; 6735 | 2195; 3510 | 277; 845 | 7245; 12,817 |
| 2015 | 218; 213 | 450; 1443 | 4085; 6626 | 2080; 3771 | 243; 964 | 7076; 13,017 |
| 157; 143 | ||||||
Growth of TKA and THA procedures in Brazil and its regions between 2008 and 2015.
| Region | North TKA/THA | Northeast TKA/THA | Southeast TKA/THA | South TKA/THA | Midwest TKA/THA | Brazil TKA/THA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008/2009 | 289%; −20.6% | 27.6%; 0.7% | 26.2%; 11.5% | −0.3%; −0.8% | 43.7%; 15.6% | 21.4%; 5.8% |
| 2009/2010 | −23.5%; 14% | 39.1%; 5.8% | 9.8%; 5.6% | 9.0%; −1.9% | −17.5%; 19.2% | 9.3%; 4.2% |
| 2010/2011 | −1.3%; −0.8% | 9.0%; 2.0% | 6.1%; 5.1% | 21.6%; −0.3% | 4.3%; −11.7% | 10.2%; 2.0% |
| 2011/2012 | −0.6%; 0% | −5.5%; −9.8% | 0.8%; 2.2% | −4.4%; −4.6% | 5.3%; −2.1% | −1.1%; −1.4% |
| 2012/2013 | 31.4%; 45.1% | 27.5%; 3.8% | 13.2%; 9.0% | 26.5%; 10.3% | 44.3%; 27.7% | 19.5%; 10.1% |
| 2013/2014 | −5.8%; 26.8% | −9.7%; −0.6% | 7.0%; −1.2% | 5.0%; 4.5% | 9.0%; 3.1% | 3.9%; 1.0% |
| 2014/2015 | 23.1%; 2.4% | −20.2%; −5.0% | 0%; −1.6% | −5.2%; 7.4% | −12.2%; 14.0% | −2.3%; 1.5% |
Total number and percentage of elderly in Brazil and its regions who rely exclusively on the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).10, 16
| Region | North (Total ± %) | Northeast (Total ± %) | Southeast (Total ± %) | SUL (Total ± %) | Midwest (Total ± %) | Brazil (Total ± %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 792,063 ± 5.6% | 4,127,256 ± 9.0% | 7,509,158 ± 14.0% | 2,622,132 ± 12.6% | 939,127 ± 9.7% | 15,989,738 ± 11.0% |
| 2009 | 824,484 ± 5.7% | 4,247,855 ± 9.2% | 7,811,180 ± 14.4% | 2,731,930 ± 13.0% | 985,703 ± 10.0% | 16,601,153 ± 11.3% |
| 2010 | 860,179 ± 5.9% | 4,373,937 ± 9.4% | 8,131,829 ± 14.8% | 2,848,241 ± 13.5% | 1,035,443 ± 10.3% | 17,249,631 ± 11.6% |
| 2011 | 899,102 ± 6.1% | 4,505,972 ± 9.6% | 8,471,984 ± 15.2% | 2,971,283 ± 13.9% | 1,088,442 ± 10.7% | 17,936,783 ± 12.0% |
| 2012 | 941,292 ± 6.3% | 4,644,148 ± 9.8% | 8,831,956 ± 15.9% | 3,101,156 ± 14.3% | 1,144,769 ± 11.1% | 18,663,323 ± 12.4% |
| 2013 | 986,504 ± 6.5% | 4,788,886 ± 10.0% | 9,211,035 ± 16.4% | 3,237,311 ± 14.9% | 1,204,304 ± 11.4% | 19,428,039 ± 12.9% |
| 2014 | 1,034,299 ± 6.7% | 4,940,945 ± 10.2% | 9,608,665 ± 17.0% | 3,379,149 ± 15.5% | 1,266,933 ± 11.9% | 20,229,983 ± 13.2% |
| 2015 | 1,084,402 ± 6.9% | 5,100,897 ± 10.4% | 10,023,944 ± 17.6% | 3,520,041 ± 16.0% | 1,332,533 ± 12.3% | 21,067,978 ± 13.6% |
Total knee (TKA) and hip (TKA) arthroplasties per 100,000 elderly individuals, mean annual growth of surgeries in several countries, and mean population estimate with percentage of elderly subjects.10, 11, 14, 15, 16
| Indexes | TKA/100,000 (year) | TKA annual growth | THA/100,000 (year) | THA annual growth | Population (2010) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 213.1 (2010) | 4.8% (2005–2010) | 295 (2010) | 2.3% (2005–2010) | 81,780,000 ± 21% |
| Australia | 200.6 (2010) | 5.8% (2002–2010) | 249.1 (2010) | 2.4% (2002–2010) | 22,030,000 ± 14% |
| Brazil (SUS) | 3.9 (2010) | 8.7% (2008–2015) | 7.8 (2010) | 3.3% (2008–2015) | 147,600,836 ± 10% |
| Denmark | 174.7 (2010) | 13.7% (2000–2010) | 225.4 (2010) | 4.9% (2000–2010) | 5,548,000 ± 17% |
| Spain | 104.4 (2010) | 8.1% (2000–2010) | 97 (2010) | 3.2% (2000–2010) | 47,020,000 ± 17% |
| United States | 213.3 (2010) | 9.2% (2000–2010) | 257 (2010) | 8.0% (2000–2010) | 309,000,000 ± 13% |
| Finland | 187 (2010) | 7.6% (2000–2010) | 199.1 (2010) | 4.2% (2000–2010) | 5,363,000 ± 18% |
| France | 124 (2010) | 4.7% (2000–2010) | 224.7 (2010) | 1.0% (2000–2010) | 65,020,000 ± 17% |
| Netherlands | 127.6 (2009) | 10.7% (2000–2009) | 213.3 (2009) | 2.7% (2000–2009) | 16,620,000 ± 16% |
| Italy | 97.7 (2009) | 9.7% (2000–2009) | 146.9 (2009) | 2.3% (2000–2009) | 59,280,000 ± 21% |
| Luxembourg | 155.4 (2010) | 3.7% (2000–2010) | 207.6 (2010) | 0.8% (2000–2010) | 92,441 ± 14% |
| Portugal: | 61.7 (2009) | 19.1% (2000–2009) | 87.8 (2009) | 2.5% (2000–2009) | 10,570,000 ± 19% |
| Sweden | 125.3 (2009) | 6.1% (2000–2010) | 210.4 (2010) | 2.4% (2000–2009) | 9,378,000 ± 18% |
| Switzerland | 211.9 (2010) | 8.1% (2002–2010) | 265.5 (2010) | 1.7% (2002–2010) | 7,825,000 ± 17% |
The classification considers individuals over 60 years of age, according to the law in force in the country for the classification of the elderly. The other countries used the cut-off 65 years to define the elderly.
Proportion of knee (TKA) and hip (TKA) arthroplasties performed by 100,000 people who rely exclusively on SUS in Brazil and regions.10, 15, 16
| Region | North TKA; THA | Northeast TKA; THA | Southeast TKA; THA | South TKA; ATQ | Midwest TKA; THA | Brazil TKA; THA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.35; 0.90 | 0.58; 3.29 | 4.23; 9.21 | 6.31; 15.83 | 1.40; 5.58 | 2.78; 7.92 |
| 2009 | 1.34; 0.70 | 0.74; 3.28 | 5.29; 10.10 | 6.23; 15.56 | 1.97; 6.34 | 3.63; 7.76 |
| 2010 | 1.00; 0.78 | 1.02; 3.45 | 5.76; 10.65 | 6.74; 15.12 | 1.60; 7.44 | 3.94; 7.80 |
| 2011 | 0.97; 0.76 | 1.11; 3.49 | 6.06; 11.11 | 8.13; 14.94 | 1.64; 6.46 | 3.95; 7.84 |
| 2012 | 0.95; 0.75 | 1.04; 3.12 | 6.06; 11.26 | 7.70; 14.19 | 1.70; 6.22 | 3.87; 7.65 |
| 2013 | 1.23; 1.08 | 1.31; 3.22 | 6.81; 12.0 | 9.67; 15.54 | 2.42; 7.83 | 4.59; 8.35 |
| 2014 | 1.15; 1.35 | 1.18; 3.18 | 7.23; 11.94 | 10.08; 16.12 | 2.60; 7.95 | 4.73; 8.37 |
| 2015 | 1.41; 1.38 | 0.93; 3.00 | 7.19; 11.66 | 9.48; 17.20 | 2.25; 8.94 | 4.58; 8.43 |
| 1.94; 7.09 |
Number of elderly in Brazil and regions for each total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and hip (TKA) performed.10, 15, 16
| Region | North TKA; THA | Northeast TKA; THA | Southeast TKA; THA | South TKA; ATQ | Midwest TKA; THA | Brazil TKA; THA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 16,164; 6286 | 15,400; 2751 | 3309; 1520 | 2006; 799 | 6956; 1745 | 3969; 1540 |
| 2009 | 4503; 8601 | 12,789; 2894 | 2727; 1418 | 2096; 840 | 5080; 1584 | 3392; 1510 |
| 2010 | 5891; 7545 | 9188; 2733 | 2583; 1397 | 2090; 932 | 6471; 1395 | 3252; 1565 |
| 2011 | 6243; 7956 | 8682; 2761 | 2537; 1384 | 1719; 935 | 6517; 1661 | 3041; 1533 |
| 2012 | 6582; 8330 | 9477; 3154 | 2622; 1412 | 1878; 1019 | 6504; 1785 | 3202; 1619 |
| 2013 | 5247; 6015 | 7662; 3132 | 2415; 1351 | 1474; 964 | 4.741; 1.470 | 3333; 1686 |
| 2014 | 5843; 4972 | 8760; 3252 | 2353; 1428 | 1539; 962 | 4573; 1499 | 2902; 1594 |
| 2015 | 4974; 5091 | 11,335; 3534 | 2453; 1512 | 1692; 933 | 5483; 1382 | 2907; 1643 |
Mean length of hospital stay for knee (TKA) and hip (TKA) arthroplasties in Brazil and regions.
| Region | North TKA; THA | Northeast TKA; THA | Southeast TKA; THA | South TKA; ATQ | Midwest TKA; THA | Brazil TKA; THA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 6.3; 8.0 | 6.7; 8.7 | 5.1; 6.9 | 5.3; 6.7 | 8.5; 7.7 | 5.4; 7.2 |
| 2009 | 6.8; 8.7 | 6.2; 8.5 | 4.7; 7.5 | 4.9; 6.3 | 6.4; 8.5 | 5.0; 7.3 |
| 2010 | 5.4; 8.8 | 6.1; 8.9 | 4.5; 6.9 | 4.7; 6.1 | 7.2; 8.6 | 4.8; 7.1 |
| 2011 | 5.9; 11.5 | 5.0; 8.9 | 4.5; 7.2 | 4.4; 6.0 | 7.4; 9.5 | 4.6; 7.3 |
| 2012 | 5.9; 11.6 | 5.2; 9.1 | 4.7; 7.2 | 4.6; 5.9 | 7.7; 9.9 | 4.8; 7.3 |
| 2013 | 5.2; 12.3 | 4.7; 9.5 | 4.7; 7.0 | 4.3; 5.9 | 5.8; 8.7 | 4.6; 7.2 |
| 2014 | 5.4; 15.4 | 4.7; 9.2 | 4.3; 6.9 | 4.3; 5.8 | 5.4; 7.6 | 4.4; 7.1 |
| 2015 | 5.6; 13.2 | 4.6; 9.7 | 4.6; 6.9 | 4.1; 5.5 | 5.0; 7.2 | 4.5; 7.0 |
| 5.4; 9.0 | 4.5; 6.0 |
Mortality rate in total knee (TKA) and hip (TKA) arthroplasties in Brazil and regions.
| Region | North TKA; THA | Northeast TKA; THA | Southeast TKA; THA | South TKA; ATQ | Midwest TKA; THA | Brazil TKA; THA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2.0; 0.0 | 0.3; 1.6 | 0.2; 2.6 | 0.1; 1.2 | 0.0; 2.6 | 0.5; 2.0 |
| 2009 | 0.0; 1.0 | 0.3; 2.8 | 0.3; 2.2 | 0.1; 1.5 | 0.5; 2.2 | 0.3; 2.1 |
| 2010 | 0.7; 0.0 | 0.2; 1.6 | 0.1; 2.2 | 0.1; 1.3 | 0.6; 2.9 | 0.1; 1.9 |
| 2011 | 0.0; 1.7 | 0.2; 2.3 | 0.1; 2.6 | 0.1; 1.3 | 0.6; 2.4 | 0.1; 2.2 |
| 2012 | 0.0; 0.9 | 0.0; 2.8 | 0.1; 2.5 | 0.3; 1.2 | 1.1; 1.4 | 0.2; 2.1 |
| 2013 | 0.0; 1.8 | 0.0; 2.9 | 0.1; 2.0 | 0.1; 1.4 | 0.4; 1.0 | 0.1; 1.8 |
| 2014 | 0.0; 2.9 | 0.5; 1.6 | 0.3; 1.8 | 0.2; 1.4 | 0.0; 2.5 | 0.3; 1.7 |
| 2015 | 0.4; 0.9 | 0.0; 2.1 | 0.1; 1.6 | 0.1; 1.0 | 0.0; 1.9 | 0.1; 1.5 |