Literature DB >> 30025698

Effect of Charge Delivery on Thromboembolism During Radiofrequency Ablation in Canines.

David A Igel1, Jon F Urban2, James P Kent2, Bernard Lim3, K L Venkatachalam4, Samuel J Asirvatham5, Daniel C Sigg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether delivering negative charge to catheter tips reduces thromboembolism during catheter ablation.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation prevents atrial fibrillation that can cause stroke or death. However, ablation itself can cause stroke (2%) or silent ischemia (2% to 41%), possibly via particulate debris that embolizes after coagulum adherence to catheter surfaces. Coagulum formation on RF catheters can be prevented by applying negative charge, but it is unknown if charge reduces peripheral thromboembolism.
METHODS: Paired (Charge ON vs. OFF) endocardial RF ablations were performed in 9 canines using nonirrigated RF catheters. Continuous negative charge was delivered via -100 μA of DC current applied to ablation catheter electrodes. Intracardiac echocardiography was used to navigate the catheter and to monitor coagulum formation. In a subset of 5 canines, microemboli flowing through polyester tubing between the femoral artery and vein (extracorporeal loop) were monitored with bubble counters and inline filter fabric. After each ablation, catheter-tip coagulum and blood particles deposited on the filters were quantified using photography and imaging software (ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland).
RESULTS: Negative charge significantly decreased the extracorporeal loop median filter area covered by particles (n = 19 pairs) by 10.2 mm2 (p = 0.03), and decreased median filter particles by 349 (p = 0.03). Negative charge also decreased the percentage of the catheter tip surface area covered by coagulum (n = 39 pairs) by 7.2% (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Negative charge delivery to ablation catheter tips during RF ablation can reduce particulate embolization material in an extracorporeal loop, and potentially reduce thromboembolic risk associated with RF ablation.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coagulum; electrophysiology; embolism; fibrinogen; stroke; thrombus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30025698      PMCID: PMC6056020          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  15 in total

1.  Temperature-controlled irrigated tip radiofrequency catheter ablation: comparison of in vivo and in vitro lesion dimensions for standard catheter and irrigated tip catheter with minimal infusion rate.

Authors:  H H Petersen; X Chen; A Pietersen; J H Svendsen; S Haunsø
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-04

Review 2.  Thromboembolic complications of cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation: a review of the reported incidence, pathogenesis and current research directions.

Authors:  L Zhou; D Keane; G Reed; J Ruskin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-04

3.  Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Riccardo Cappato; Hugh Calkins; Shih-Ann Chen; Wyn Davies; Yoshito Iesaka; Jonathan Kalman; You-Ho Kim; George Klein; Andrea Natale; Douglas Packer; Allan Skanes; Federico Ambrogi; Elia Biganzoli
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-12-07

4.  Incidence and predictors of periprocedural cerebrovascular accident in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daniel Scherr; Kavita Sharma; Darshan Dalal; David Spragg; Karuna Chilukuri; Alan Cheng; Jun Dong; Charles A Henrikson; Saman Nazarian; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Joseph E Marine
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-12

5.  Subtle post-procedural cognitive dysfunction after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Caroline Medi; Lisbeth Evered; Brendan Silbert; Andrew Teh; Karen Halloran; Joseph Morton; Peter Kistler; Jonathan Kalman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Concurrent application of charge using a novel circuit prevents heat-related coagulum formation during radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Bernard Lim; Kalpathi L Venkatachalam; Arshad Jahangir; Susan B Johnson; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-03-21

7.  High incidence of thrombus formation without impedance rise during radiofrequency ablation using electrode temperature control.

Authors:  Kagari Matsudaira; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Fred H M Wittkampf; William S Yamanashi; Shinobu Imai; Jan V Pitha; Ralph Lazzara; Warren M Jackman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Soft thrombus formation in radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  Julie M Demolin; Olaf J Eick; Kuno Münch; Edouard Koullick; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Fred H M Wittkampf
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Microembolism and catheter ablation I: a comparison of irrigated radiofrequency and multielectrode-phased radiofrequency catheter ablation of pulmonary vein ostia.

Authors:  David E Haines; Mark T Stewart; Sarah Dahlberg; Noah D Barka; Cathy Condie; Gary R Fiedler; Nicole A Kirchhof; Franck Halimi; Thomas Deneke
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-02-07

10.  Effect of Left Atrial Ablation Process and Strategy on Microemboli Formation During Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in an In Vivo Model.

Authors:  Mitsuru Takami; H Immo Lehmann; Kay D Parker; Kirk M Welker; Susan B Johnson; Douglas L Packer
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Three-dimensional and catheter-based intracardiac echocardiographic characterization of the interatrial septum in 2 horses with suspicion of a patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Ingrid Vernemmen; Ellen Paulussen; Julie Dauvillier; Annelies Decloedt; Gunther van Loon
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.175

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.