Mitsuru Takami1, H Immo Lehmann1, Kay D Parker1, Kirk M Welker1, Susan B Johnson1, Douglas L Packer2. 1. From the Translational Interventional Electrophysiology Laboratory (M.T., H.I.L., K.D.P., S.B.J., D.L.P.) and Department of Radiology (K.M.W.), Mayo Clinic/St. Marys Campus, Rochester, MN. 2. From the Translational Interventional Electrophysiology Laboratory (M.T., H.I.L., K.D.P., S.B.J., D.L.P.) and Department of Radiology (K.M.W.), Mayo Clinic/St. Marys Campus, Rochester, MN. packer@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Formation of microemboli during catheter ablation has been suggested as a cause for asymptomatic cerebral emboli. However, it is unknown which part of the process and ablation setting/strategy is most strongly related to this occurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 27 pigs were used. Catheter/sheath manipulations in left atrium were performed in 25 of 27 pigs outfitted with microemboli monitoring systems. Ablations using open-irrigated radiofrequency catheters were performed in 18 of 25 pigs. Two of 27 pigs did not undergo left atrial procedures and were injected with microembolic materials in the carotid artery to serve as positive controls. In total, 334 sheath/catheter manipulations (transseptal puncture, sheath flushing, catheter insertion, pulmonary vein venography, and sheath exchange) and 333 radiofrequency applications (power setting, 30/50 W; point-by-point/drag ablations) were analyzed. High microbubble volume in the extracorporeal circulation loop and a high number of microembolic signals in carotid artery were observed during sheath/catheter manipulations especially in saline/contrast injections at fast speed and ablations with steam pop. Fast sheath flushing produced significantly higher microbubble volume than slow sheath flushing (median, 12 200 versus 121 nL; P<0.0001). A total of 44 of 126 (35%) blood filters in the circulation loop showed microparticles (thrombus/coagulum and tissue). Most of them were seen after radiofrequency application especially in 50-W ablations, drag ablations, and steam pop. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed positive-embolic lesions in control pigs. CONCLUSIONS: Formation of microbubbles was the greatest during fast saline/contrast injections and steam pops, whereas high-power radiofrequency applications, drag ablations, and steam pops produced most of the microparticles.
BACKGROUND: Formation of microemboli during catheter ablation has been suggested as a cause for asymptomatic cerebral emboli. However, it is unknown which part of the process and ablation setting/strategy is most strongly related to this occurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 27 pigs were used. Catheter/sheath manipulations in left atrium were performed in 25 of 27 pigs outfitted with microemboli monitoring systems. Ablations using open-irrigated radiofrequency catheters were performed in 18 of 25 pigs. Two of 27 pigs did not undergo left atrial procedures and were injected with microembolic materials in the carotid artery to serve as positive controls. In total, 334 sheath/catheter manipulations (transseptal puncture, sheath flushing, catheter insertion, pulmonary vein venography, and sheath exchange) and 333 radiofrequency applications (power setting, 30/50 W; point-by-point/drag ablations) were analyzed. High microbubble volume in the extracorporeal circulation loop and a high number of microembolic signals in carotid artery were observed during sheath/catheter manipulations especially in saline/contrast injections at fast speed and ablations with steam pop. Fast sheath flushing produced significantly higher microbubble volume than slow sheath flushing (median, 12 200 versus 121 nL; P<0.0001). A total of 44 of 126 (35%) blood filters in the circulation loop showed microparticles (thrombus/coagulum and tissue). Most of them were seen after radiofrequency application especially in 50-W ablations, drag ablations, and steam pop. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed positive-embolic lesions in control pigs. CONCLUSIONS: Formation of microbubbles was the greatest during fast saline/contrast injections and steam pops, whereas high-power radiofrequency applications, drag ablations, and steam pops produced most of the microparticles.
Authors: Vasilis C Babaliaros; Adam B Greenbaum; Jaffar M Khan; Toby Rogers; Dee Dee Wang; Marvin H Eng; William W O'Neill; Gaetano Paone; Vinod H Thourani; Stamatios Lerakis; Dennis W Kim; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: David A Igel; Jon F Urban; James P Kent; Bernard Lim; K L Venkatachalam; Samuel J Asirvatham; Daniel C Sigg Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2018-05-02
Authors: Anetta Lasek-Bal; Przemysław Puz; Joanna Wieczorek; Seweryn Nowak; Anna Maria Wnuk-Wojnar; Aldona Warsz-Wianecka; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Jaffar M Khan; Toby Rogers; William H Schenke; Jonathan R Mazal; Anthony Z Faranesh; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: H Immo Lehmann; Christian Graeff; Palma Simoniello; Anna Constantinescu; Mitsuru Takami; Patrick Lugenbiel; Daniel Richter; Anna Eichhorn; Matthias Prall; Robert Kaderka; Fine Fiedler; Stephan Helmbrecht; Claudia Fournier; Nadine Erbeldinger; Ann-Kathrin Rahm; Rasmus Rivinius; Dierk Thomas; Hugo A Katus; Susan B Johnson; Kay D Parker; Jürgen Debus; Samuel J Asirvatham; Christoph Bert; Marco Durante; Douglas L Packer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Karl Georg Haeusler; Benjamin Blank; Joseph De Bono; David Callans; Arif Elvan; Thomas Fetsch; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Philip Gentlesk; Massimo Grimaldi; Jim Hansen; Gerhard Hindricks; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Tyler Massaro; Lluis Mont; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Georg Nölker; Jonathan P Piccini; Tom De Potter; Daniel Scherr; Ulrich Schotten; Sakis Themistoclakis; Derick Todd; Johan Vijgen; Luigi Di Biase Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 29.983