| Literature DB >> 30022872 |
Su Jin Park1,2, Sun Sook Paik1,2, Ji-Yeon Lee1, Su-Ja Oh1, In-Beom Kim1,2,3.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of various electroretinography (ERG) to the diagnosis of inner retinal dysfunction induced by mild intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in a rat glaucoma model. For inner retinal function measurements, available photopic ERG protocols were applied under various light conditions including monochromatic combinations, which complement conventional scotopic ERG. Three episcleral veins in the right eyes of Sprague-Dawley rats were cauterized to induce an experimental model of glaucoma, leading to mild IOP elevation. ERG responses were measured before surgery and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after cauterization. We first confirmed that the amplitude reduction in the standard photopic b-wave was almost comparable to the amplitudes of scotopic a- and b-waves in glaucomatous eyes over time. We have implemented additional photopic ERG protocols under different stimulus conditions, which consisted of a longer duration and different monochromatic combinations. Such a change in the stimulations resulted in more pronounced differences in response between the two groups. Especially in normal animals, blue stimulation on a green background produced the largest b-wave and photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitudes and caused more pronounced oscillatory potential (OP) wavelets (individual components). In glaucomatous eyes, blue stimulation on a green background significantly reduced PhNR amplitudes and abolished the robust OP components. These results, by providing the usefulness of blue on green combination, suggest the applicable photopic ERG protocol that complements the conventional ERG methods of accessing the progression of glaucomatous damage in the rat retina.Entities:
Keywords: Electroretinography; Glaucoma; Oscillatory potential; Photopic negative response; Rat retina
Year: 2018 PMID: 30022872 PMCID: PMC6050416 DOI: 10.5607/en.2018.27.3.210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Neurobiol ISSN: 1226-2560 Impact factor: 3.261
Fig. 1The progression of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation and electroretinography (ERG) amplitudes recorded from brief white stimuli after episcleral vein cauterization. (A) Diagram of the episcleral vein. (B) IOP changes from the age-matched control group and the glaucomatous group are plotted over time. The results are expressed as the mean IOP±the standard error of the mean (SEM) (n=6 in the control group and in each time group). (C) Representative waveforms of scotopic, photopic ERG in normal rat. (D–E) Scotopic ERG data are shown as the normalized amplitudes of a- and b-waves. (F) Photopic ERG is represented as normalized b-wave amplitudes over time. The results are expressed as the mean normalized amplitude±SEM (n=6 in the control group and in each time group). Significant differences at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks denoted as asterisk (*) are from control vs. glaucoma groups. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Fig. 2An associative analysis of prolonged photopic electroretinography (ERG) responses including all components using light stimuli. (A) Representative traces of each prolonged photopic ERG response from a normal rat eye are shown for different color combinations. (B) In normal rats, differences in the photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitude are compared according to color combination conditions. (C) Under the same longer photopic flash that elicited the PhNR, oscillatory potentials (OPs) are measured by the number of prominent wavelets and compared according to the color combinations. (D) The responses from prolonged photopic ERG are shown as a trace from 0 to 8 weeks after cauterization. The data values are presented as the mean (n=6 in the control group and in each time group). (E) The change in PhNR amplitude over time is presented as normalized data. The results are expressed as the mean amplitude±the standard error of the mean (SEM) (n=6 in the control group and in each time group). (F) The number of OP wavelets is analyzed over time under blue stimulation/green background (B/G) conditions. The data values are presented as the mean±SEM (n=6 in the control group and in each time group). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.