Literature DB >> 30022133

Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity.

Jarosław M Granda1, Liva Donina1, Vincenza Dragone1, De-Liang Long1, Leroy Cronin2.   

Abstract

The discovery of chemical reactions is an inherently unpredictable and time-consuming process1. An attractive alternative is to predict reactivity, although relevant approaches, such as computer-aided reaction design, are still in their infancy2. Reaction prediction based on high-level quantum chemical methods is complex3, even for simple molecules. Although machine learning is powerful for data analysis4,5, its applications in chemistry are still being developed6. Inspired by strategies based on chemists' intuition7, we propose that a reaction system controlled by a machine learning algorithm may be able to explore the space of chemical reactions quickly, especially if trained by an expert8. Here we present an organic synthesis robot that can perform chemical reactions and analysis faster than they can be performed manually, as well as predict the reactivity of possible reagent combinations after conducting a small number of experiments, thus effectively navigating chemical reaction space. By using machine learning for decision making, enabled by binary encoding of the chemical inputs, the reactions can be assessed in real time using nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy. The machine learning system was able to predict the reactivity of about 1,000 reaction combinations with accuracy greater than 80 per cent after considering the outcomes of slightly over 10 per cent of the dataset. This approach was also used to calculate the reactivity of published datasets. Further, by using real-time data from our robot, these predictions were followed up manually by a chemist, leading to the discovery of four reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30022133      PMCID: PMC6223543          DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  20 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  M I Jordan; T M Mitchell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The natural productome.

Authors:  Andrea M E Palazzolo; Claire L W Simons; Martin D Burke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Contemporary screening approaches to reaction discovery and development.

Authors:  Karl D Collins; Tobias Gensch; Frank Glorius
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 24.427

4.  Artificial Intelligence. Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Yolanda Gil; Mark Greaves; James Hendler; Haym Hirsh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A Short Review of Chemical Reaction Database Systems, Computer-Aided Synthesis Design, Reaction Prediction and Synthetic Feasibility.

Authors:  Wendy A Warr
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.353

6.  Predicting reaction performance in C-N cross-coupling using machine learning.

Authors:  Derek T Ahneman; Jesús G Estrada; Shishi Lin; Spencer D Dreher; Abigail G Doyle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Deoxyfluorination with Sulfonyl Fluorides: Navigating Reaction Space with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Matthew K Nielsen; Derek T Ahneman; Orestes Riera; Abigail G Doyle
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations?

Authors:  Dávid Bajusz; Anita Rácz; Károly Héberger
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  A case study of the mechanism of alcohol-mediated Morita Baylis-Hillman reactions. The importance of experimental observations.

Authors:  R Erik Plata; Daniel A Singleton
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  A self optimizing synthetic organic reactor system using real-time in-line NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Victor Sans; Luzian Porwol; Vincenza Dragone; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 9.825

View more
  41 in total

1.  Transforming Computational Drug Discovery with Machine Learning and AI.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Adrian E Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  A unified machine-learning protocol for asymmetric catalysis as a proof of concept demonstration using asymmetric hydrogenation.

Authors:  Sukriti Singh; Monika Pareek; Avtar Changotra; Sayan Banerjee; Bangaru Bhaskararao; P Balamurugan; Raghavan B Sunoj
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Perspectives from nearly five decades of total synthesis of natural products and their analogues for biology and medicine.

Authors:  K C Nicolaou; Stephan Rigol
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 13.423

4.  Unified Deep Learning Model for Multitask Reaction Predictions with Explanation.

Authors:  Jieyu Lu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  What Does the Machine Learn? Knowledge Representations of Chemical Reactivity.

Authors:  Joshua A Kammeraad; Jack Goetz; Eric A Walker; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Natural product-informed exploration of chemical space to enable bioactive molecular discovery.

Authors:  Adam Nelson; George Karageorgis
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2020-12-16

7.  Combining generative artificial intelligence and on-chip synthesis for de novo drug design.

Authors:  Francesca Grisoni; Berend J H Huisman; Alexander L Button; Michael Moret; Kenneth Atz; Daniel Merk; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Regio-selectivity prediction with a machine-learned reaction representation and on-the-fly quantum mechanical descriptors.

Authors:  Yanfei Guan; Connor W Coley; Haoyang Wu; Duminda Ranasinghe; Esther Heid; Thomas J Struble; Lagnajit Pattanaik; William H Green; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  A robotic prebiotic chemist probes long term reactions of complexifying mixtures.

Authors:  Silke Asche; Geoffrey J T Cooper; Graham Keenan; Cole Mathis; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Digitising chemical synthesis in automated and robotic flow.

Authors:  Tomas Hardwick; Nisar Ahmed
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.