Literature DB >> 31915295

A unified machine-learning protocol for asymmetric catalysis as a proof of concept demonstration using asymmetric hydrogenation.

Sukriti Singh1, Monika Pareek1, Avtar Changotra1, Sayan Banerjee1, Bangaru Bhaskararao1, P Balamurugan2, Raghavan B Sunoj3.   

Abstract

Design of asymmetric catalysts generally involves time- and resource-intensive heuristic endeavors. In view of the steady increase in interest toward efficient catalytic asymmetric reactions and the rapid growth in the field of machine learning (ML) in recent years, we envisaged dovetailing these two important domains. We selected a set of quantum chemically derived molecular descriptors from five different asymmetric binaphthyl-derived catalyst families with the propensity to impact the enantioselectivity of asymmetric hydrogenation of alkenes and imines. The predictive power of the random forest (RF) built using the molecular parameters of a set of 368 substrate-catalyst combinations is found to be impressive, with a root-mean-square error (rmse) in the predicted enantiomeric excess (%ee) of about 8.4 ± 1.8 compared to the experimentally known values. The accuracy of RF is found to be superior to other ML methods such as convolutional neural network, decision tree, and eXtreme gradient boosting as well as stepwise linear regression. The proposed method is expected to provide a leap forward in the design of catalysts for asymmetric transformations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asymmetric catalysis; computational chemistry; machine learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 31915295      PMCID: PMC6983389          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1916392117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

Review 1.  Asymmetric catalysis in complex target synthesis.

Authors:  Mark S Taylor; Eric N Jacobsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A Predictive Tool for Electrophilic Aromatic Substitutions Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Anna Tomberg; Magnus J Johansson; Per-Ola Norrby
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 4.  Inverse molecular design using machine learning: Generative models for matter engineering.

Authors:  Benjamin Sanchez-Lengeling; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Organic chemistry. A data-intensive approach to mechanistic elucidation applied to chiral anion catalysis.

Authors:  Anat Milo; Andrew J Neel; F Dean Toste; Matthew S Sigman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A Practical Guide for Predicting the Stereochemistry of Bifunctional Phosphoric Acid Catalyzed Reactions of Imines.

Authors:  Jolene P Reid; Luis Simón; Jonathan M Goodman
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 7.  Rhodium-catalysed asymmetric hydrogenation as a valuable synthetic tool for the preparation of chiral drugs.

Authors:  Pablo Etayo; Anton Vidal-Ferran
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 54.564

8.  Capturing chemical intuition in synthesis of metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Seyed Mohamad Moosavi; Arunraj Chidambaram; Leopold Talirz; Maciej Haranczyk; Kyriakos C Stylianou; Berend Smit
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity.

Authors:  Jarosław M Granda; Liva Donina; Vincenza Dragone; De-Liang Long; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Identifying an efficient, thermally robust inorganic phosphor host via machine learning.

Authors:  Ya Zhuo; Aria Mansouri Tehrani; Anton O Oliynyk; Anna C Duke; Jakoah Brgoch
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  A transfer learning approach for reaction discovery in small data situations using generative model.

Authors:  Sukriti Singh; Raghavan B Sunoj
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-22

2.  Reducing Challenges in Organic Synthesis with Stereoselective Hydrogenation and Tandem Catalysis.

Authors:  Patrick D Parker; Xintong Hou; Vy M Dong
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 16.383

3.  Regio-selectivity prediction with a machine-learned reaction representation and on-the-fly quantum mechanical descriptors.

Authors:  Yanfei Guan; Connor W Coley; Haoyang Wu; Duminda Ranasinghe; Esther Heid; Thomas J Struble; Lagnajit Pattanaik; William H Green; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 9.825

4.  Machine-Learning-Enabled Virtual Screening for Inhibitors of Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1.

Authors:  Jiajun Zhou; Shiying Wu; Boon Giin Lee; Tianwei Chen; Ziqi He; Yukun Lei; Bencan Tang; Jonathan D Hirst
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Artificial intelligence: machine learning for chemical sciences.

Authors:  Akshaya Karthikeyan; U Deva Priyakumar
Journal:  J Chem Sci (Bangalore)       Date:  2021-12-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.