OBJECTIVE: We examined whether associations between daily psychosocial stressor exposures and carotid artery intima-medial thickness (IMT) may be stronger among those showing larger stress-related cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) during the course of daily living. METHODS: A total of 474 healthy working adults (ages 30-54 years) collected ambulatory blood pressure and recorded their daily experiences, using electronic diaries, during two 2-day periods for a week. Measures of mean momentary task strain and social conflict were used as indices of stressor exposure, and partial regression coefficients linking momentary strain and conflict with ambulatory blood pressure fluctuations were used as measures of CVR. IMT was assessed in the carotid arteries using B-mode ultrasound. RESULTS: After covariate adjustment, associations between mean task strain exposure and IMT were significant among those high in CVR to strain (for systolic blood pressure, p = .006, for diastolic blood pressure, p = .011) but not among those low in strain CVR. Similarly, associations involving mean conflict exposure were significant among those high in CVR to social conflict (p < .001 for systolic blood pressure, p = .001 for diastolic blood pressure) but not among low social conflict reactors. Significant moderation effects were more consistently shown for task strain than for social conflict, but the overall pattern of results was robust across two different types of statistical modeling procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in CVR may moderate the effects of daily psychosocial stress on subclinical CVD among healthy employed adults. Using ecological momentary assessment to measure stress exposure as well as stress reactivity may facilitate our ability to detect these effects.
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether associations between daily psychosocial stressor exposures and carotid artery intima-medial thickness (IMT) may be stronger among those showing larger stress-related cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) during the course of daily living. METHODS: A total of 474 healthy working adults (ages 30-54 years) collected ambulatory blood pressure and recorded their daily experiences, using electronic diaries, during two 2-day periods for a week. Measures of mean momentary task strain and social conflict were used as indices of stressor exposure, and partial regression coefficients linking momentary strain and conflict with ambulatory blood pressure fluctuations were used as measures of CVR. IMT was assessed in the carotid arteries using B-mode ultrasound. RESULTS: After covariate adjustment, associations between mean task strain exposure and IMT were significant among those high in CVR to strain (for systolic blood pressure, p = .006, for diastolic blood pressure, p = .011) but not among those low in strain CVR. Similarly, associations involving mean conflict exposure were significant among those high in CVR to social conflict (p < .001 for systolic blood pressure, p = .001 for diastolic blood pressure) but not among low social conflict reactors. Significant moderation effects were more consistently shown for task strain than for social conflict, but the overall pattern of results was robust across two different types of statistical modeling procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in CVR may moderate the effects of daily psychosocial stress on subclinical CVD among healthy employed adults. Using ecological momentary assessment to measure stress exposure as well as stress reactivity may facilitate our ability to detect these effects.
Authors: Erica S Spatz; Josefa L Martinez-Brockman; Baylah Tessier-Sherman; Bobak Mortazavi; Brita Roy; Jeremy I Schwartz; Cruz M Nazario; Rohan Maharaj; Maxine Nunez; O Peter Adams; Matthew Burg; Marcella Nunez-Smith Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Caitlin M DuPont; Aidan G C Wright; Stephen B Manuck; Matthew F Muldoon; J Richard Jennings; Peter J Gianaros Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2020-12-05 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Thomas Vaessen; Aki Rintala; Natalya Otsabryk; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Martien Wampers; Stephan Claes; Inez Myin-Germeys Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yunan Xu; Sheri L Towe; Shakiera T Causey; Paul A Dennis; Christina S Meade Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Amy K Otto; Emily C Soriano; Wendy C Birmingham; Susan T Vadaparampil; Richard E Heyman; Lee Ellington; Maija Reblin Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2022-04-02