Literature DB >> 34244701

Impact of Relationship and Communication Variables on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Advanced Cancer Caregivers.

Amy K Otto1, Emily C Soriano2, Wendy C Birmingham3, Susan T Vadaparampil1, Richard E Heyman4, Lee Ellington5, Maija Reblin1,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer impacts both patients and their family caregivers. Evidence suggests that caregiving stress, including the strain of taking on a new role, can elevate the risk of numerous health conditions, including high blood pressure (BP). However, the caregiver's psychosocial experiences, including their interpersonal relationship with the patient, may buffer some of the negative physiological consequences of caregiving.
PURPOSE: To examine the influence of psychosocial contextual variables on caregiver ambulatory BP.
METHODS: Participants were 81 spouse-caregivers of patients with advanced gastrointestinal or thoracic cancer. For an entire day at home with the patient, caregivers wore an ambulatory BP monitor that took readings at random intervals. Immediately after each BP reading, caregivers reported on physical circumstances (e.g., posture, activity) and psychosocial experiences since the last BP measurement, including affect, caregiver and patient disclosure, and role perceptions (i.e., feeling more like a spouse vs. caregiver). Multilevel modeling was used to examine concurrent and lagged effects of psychosocial variables on systolic and diastolic BP, controlling for momentary posture, activity, negative affect, and time.
RESULTS: Feeling more like a caregiver (vs. spouse) was associated with lower systolic BP at the same time point. Patient disclosure to the caregiver since the previous BP reading was associated with higher diastolic BP. No lagged effects were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers' psychosocial experiences can have immediate physiological effects. Future research should examine possible cognitive and behavioral mechanisms of these effects, as well as longer-term effects of caregiver role perceptions and patient disclosure on caregiver psychological and physical health. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Cancer; Caregiver; Couples; Disclosure; Role

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34244701      PMCID: PMC8976288          DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  53 in total

1.  Cardiovascular and electrodermal responses to support and provocation: interpersonal methods in the study of psychophysiological reactivity.

Authors:  L C Gallo; T W Smith; J C Kircher
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Caregiving: role engulfment and the loss of self.

Authors:  M M Skaff; L I Pearlin
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1992-10

3.  Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family caregivers of adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Margaret Bevans; Esther M Sternberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study.

Authors:  Roberto Sega; Rita Facchetti; Michele Bombelli; Giancarlo Cesana; Giovanni Corrao; Guido Grassi; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Wendy Birmingham; Brandon Q Jones
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-03-18

6.  Effects of task strain, social conflict, and emotional activation on ambulatory cardiovascular activity: daily life consequences of recurring stress in a multiethnic adult sample.

Authors:  T W Kamarck; S M Shiffman; L Smithline; J L Goodie; J A Paty; M Gnys; J Y Jong
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges.

Authors:  J P Laurenceau; L F Barrett; P R Pietromonaco
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-05

8.  The statistical analysis of treatment effects in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings.

Authors:  M R Marler; R G Jacob; J P Lehoczky; A P Shapiro
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Everyday couples' communication research: Overcoming methodological barriers with technology.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Richard E Heyman; Lee Ellington; Brian R W Baucom; Panayiotis G Georgiou; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-10-26

10.  Ambulatory blood pressure. An independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension.

Authors:  P Verdecchia; C Porcellati; G Schillaci; C Borgioni; A Ciucci; M Battistelli; M Guerrieri; C Gatteschi; I Zampi; A Santucci; C Santucci; G Reboldi
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.