Literature DB >> 17672239

Reliability of the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver.

Kimsey H Rodriguez1, Carole R Roth, Catherine J Rees, Peter C Belafsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing has been used to assess the integrity of laryngopharyngeal sensory and motor components. The pharyngeal squeeze is a maneuver used during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing to assess pharyngeal motor function. Although the pharyngeal squeeze manuever has been used in numerous scientific publications, its reliability has not been critically evaluated. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the reliability of the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver.
METHODS: Forty individuals who were undergoing fiberoptic laryngoscopy for various reasons were instructed to perform the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver. Three different clinicians reviewed the videotape on 4 separate occasions. The clinicians were first asked to rate each side of the pharynx as normal, diminished, or absent. They were then instructed to simply rate the maneuver as normal or abnormal. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver were assessed with the kappa coefficient.
RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 58 years. Fifty-eight percent (23 of 40) were male. When the clinicians were instructed to rate each side of the pharynx as normal, diminished, or absent, the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were poor (63% to 68% agreement; kappa = 0.18 to 0.67). When the clinicians were asked to rate the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver as normal or abnormal, both interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were excellent (85% to 98% agreement; kappa = 0.75 to 0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: The pharyngeal squeeze maneuver displayed poor reliability when motor function was classified into unilateral or bilateral normal, diminished, and absent categories. The pharyngeal squeeze maneuver was very reliable when simply graded as normal or abnormal. Clinicians could not reliably distinguish between diminished and absent pharyngeal motor functions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672239     DOI: 10.1177/000348940711600601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  4 in total

1.  Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katina Swan; Reinie Cordier; Ted Brown; Renée Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  [Developments in dysphagia diagnostics : Presentation of an interdisciplinary concept].

Authors:  C Pflug; T Flügel; J C Nienstedt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology - Current state of clinical and endoscopic diagnostics, evaluation, and therapy of swallowing disorders in children.

Authors:  Christoph Arens; Ingo F Herrmann; Saskia Rohrbach; Cornelia Schwemmle; Tadeus Nawka
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 4.  Phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists approaching oropharyngeal dysphagia: an update on FEES.

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Laura W J Baijens; Ahmed Geneid; Nicole Pizzorni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.