Keith Siau1,2, Neil D Hawkes3,4, Paul Dunckley3,5. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK. keithsiau@nhs.net. 2. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK. keithsiau@nhs.net. 3. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Llantrisant, UK. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Progress towards the goal of high-quality endoscopy across health economies has been founded on high-quality structured training programmes linked to credentialing practice and ongoing performance monitoring. This review appraises the recent literature on training interventions, which may benefit performance and competency acquisition in novice endoscopy trainees. RECENT FINDINGS: Increasing data on the learning curves for different endoscopic procedures has highlighted variations in performance amongst trainees. These differences may be dependent on the trainee, trainer and training programme. Evidence of the benefit of knowledge-based training, simulation training, hands-on courses and clinical training is available to inform the planning of ideal training pathway elements. The validation of performance assessment measures and global competency tools now also provides evidence on the effectiveness of training programmes to influence the learning curve. The impact of technological advances and intelligent metrics from national databases is also predicted to drive improvements and efficiencies in training programme design and monitoring of post-training outcomes. Training in endoscopy may be augmented through a series of pre-training and in-training interventions. In conjunction with performance metrics, these evidence-based interventions could be implemented into training pathways to optimise and quality assure training in endoscopy.
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Progress towards the goal of high-quality endoscopy across health economies has been founded on high-quality structured training programmes linked to credentialing practice and ongoing performance monitoring. This review appraises the recent literature on training interventions, which may benefit performance and competency acquisition in novice endoscopy trainees. RECENT FINDINGS: Increasing data on the learning curves for different endoscopic procedures has highlighted variations in performance amongst trainees. These differences may be dependent on the trainee, trainer and training programme. Evidence of the benefit of knowledge-based training, simulation training, hands-on courses and clinical training is available to inform the planning of ideal training pathway elements. The validation of performance assessment measures and global competency tools now also provides evidence on the effectiveness of training programmes to influence the learning curve. The impact of technological advances and intelligent metrics from national databases is also predicted to drive improvements and efficiencies in training programme design and monitoring of post-training outcomes. Training in endoscopy may be augmented through a series of pre-training and in-training interventions. In conjunction with performance metrics, these evidence-based interventions could be implemented into training pathways to optimise and quality assure training in endoscopy.
Authors: Ivan Jovanovic; Lucia C Fry; Nadan Rustemovic; Branko Bilic; Hrovje Ivekovic; Marco D'Assunção; Klaus Mönkemüller Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Michal F Kaminski; Paulina Wieszczy; Maciej Rupinski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Ewa Kraszewska; Jaroslaw Kobiela; Robert Franczyk; Maria Rupinska; Bartlomiej Kocot; Anna Chaber-Ciopinska; Jacek Pachlewski; Marcin Polkowski; Jaroslaw Regula Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Catherine Ngo; Joseph W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Cecilia Terrado; Christopher Bowlus; Drew Ingram; Felix W Leung Journal: J Interv Gastroenterol Date: 2012-07-01
Authors: Marietta Iacucci; Cristina Trovato; Marco Daperno; Oluseyi Akinola; David Greenwald; Seth A Gross; Arthur Hoffman; Jeffrey Lee; Brendan C Lethebe; Mark Lowerison; Jennifer Nayor; Helmut Neumann; Timo Rath; Silvia Sanduleanu; Prateek Sharma; Ralf Kiesslich; Subrata Ghosh; John R Saltzman Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Keith Siau; James Hodson; John T Anderson; Roland Valori; Geoff Smith; Paul Hagan; Marietta Iacucci; Paul Dunckley Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Keith Siau; James Crossley; Paul Dunckley; Gavin Johnson; Mark Feeney; Neil D Hawkes; Ian L P Beales Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Katarzyna M Pawlak; Jan Kral; Rishad Khan; Sunil Amin; Mohammad Bilal; Rashid N Lui; Dalbir S Sandhu; Almoutaz Hashim; Steven Bollipo; Aline Charabaty; Enrique de-Madaria; Andrés F Rodríguez-Parra; Sergio A Sánchez-Luna; Michał Żorniak; Catharine M Walsh; Samir C Grover; Keith Siau Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Keith Siau; Margaret G Keane; Helen Steed; Grant Caddy; Nick Church; Harry Martin; Raymond McCrudden; Peter Neville; Kofi Oppong; Bharat Paranandi; Ashraf Rasheed; Richard Sturgess; Neil D Hawkes; George Webster; Gavin Johnson Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2022-01-14