Literature DB >> 33104080

Variation in exposure to endoscopic haemostasis for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding during UK gastroenterology training.

Keith Siau1,2, A John Morris1,3, Aravinth Murugananthan1,4, Brian McKaig4, Paul Dunckley1,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gastroenterologists are typically expected to be competent in endoscopic haemostasis for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB), with the Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) often heralding the onset of participation in on-call AUGIB rotas. We analysed the volume of haemostasis experience recorded by gastroenterology CCT holders on the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Training System (JETS) e-portfolio, the UK electronic portfolio for endoscopy, and assessed for variations in exposure to haemostasis.
METHODS: UK gastroenterologists awarded CCT between April 2014 and April 2017 were retrospectively identified from the specialist register. Credentials were cross-referenced with JETS to retrieve AUGIB haemostasis procedures prior to CCT. Procedures were collated according to variceal versus non-variceal therapies and compared across training deaneries.
RESULTS: Over the 3-year study period, 241 gastroenterologists were awarded CCT. 232 JETS e-portfolio users were included for analysis. In total, 12 932 haemostasis procedures were recorded, corresponding to a median of 42 (IQR 21-71) per gastroenterologist. Exposure to non-variceal modalities (median 28, IQR 15-52) was more frequent than variceal therapies (median 11, IQR 5-22; p<0.001). By procedure, adrenaline injection (median 12, IQR 6-23) and variceal band ligation (median 10, IQR 5-20) were most commonly recorded, whereas sclerotherapy experience was rare (median 0, IQR 0-1). Exposure to haemostasis did not differ by year of CCT (p=0.130) but varied significantly by deanery (p<0.001), with median procedures ranging from 20-126.
CONCLUSION: Exposure to AUGIB haemostasis during UK gastroenterology training varied across deaneries and procedural modalities which should prompt urgent locoregional review of access and delivery of training. Endoscopy departments should ensure the availability of supportive provisions in haemostasis (i.e. training/upskilling, supervision, mentorship) during the early post-CCT period. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastrointesinal endoscopy; gastrointestinal bleeding

Year:  2019        PMID: 33104080      PMCID: PMC7569517          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  11 in total

1.  Development of a national automated endoscopy database: The United Kingdom National Endoscopy Database (NED).

Authors:  Thomas Jw Lee; Keith Siau; Shiran Esmaily; James Docherty; John Stebbing; Matthew J Brookes; Raphael Broughton; Peter Rogers; Paul Dunckley; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  A call to arms for change: The UK strategy to improve standards of care in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Keith Siau; Allan John Morris
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Training in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Keith Siau; Neil D Hawkes; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09

4.  Provision of out-of-hours services for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in England: results of the 2014-2015 BSG/NHS England national survey.

Authors:  Bahman Nedjat-Shokouhi; Michael Glynn; Erika R E Denton; Simon M Greenfield
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-21

5.  Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update for the general physician.

Authors:  K Siau; W Chapman; N Sharma; D Tripathi; T Iqbal; N Bhala
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb       Date:  2017-09

6.  Shape of Training Review: an impact assessment for UK gastroenterology trainees.

Authors:  Jennifer Clough; Michael FitzPatrick; Philip Harvey; Liam Morris
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-05

7.  Attitudes to out-of-programme experiences, research and academic training of gastroenterology trainees between 2007 and 2016.

Authors:  Michael McFarlane; Neeraj Bhala; Louise China; Laith Alrubaiy; Fergus Chedgy; Benjamin R Disney; Adam D Farmer; Edward Fogden; Gareth Sadler; Mark A Hull; John McLaughlin; Howard Ellison; Julie Solomon; Matthew James Brookes
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-19

8.  Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond.

Authors:  Keith Siau; John T Green; Neil D Hawkes; Raphael Broughton; Mark Feeney; Paul Dunckley; John Roger Barton; John Stebbing; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-13

9.  Certification of UK gastrointestinal endoscopists and variations between trainee specialties: results from the JETS e-portfolio.

Authors:  Keith Siau; John T Anderson; Roland Valori; Mark Feeney; Neil D Hawkes; Gavin Johnson; Brian C McKaig; Rupert D Pullan; James Hodson; Christopher Wells; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Adam V Haycock; Ian L P Beales; Raphael Broughton; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-04-04

10.  Trends in UK endoscopy training in the BSG trainees' national survey and strategic planning for the future.

Authors:  Sujata Biswas; Laith Alrubaiy; Louise China; Melanie Lockett; Antony Ellis; Neil Hawkes
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.