Literature DB >> 30017594

Designing patient-specific 3D printed devices for posterior atlantoaxial transarticular fixation surgery.

Ganesha K Thayaparan1, Mark G Owbridge2, Robert G Thompson3, Paul S D'Urso4.   

Abstract

Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation is an effective technique for arthrodesis. Surgical accuracy is critical due to the unique anatomy of the atlantoaxial region. Intraoperative aids such as computer-assisted navigation and drilling templates offer trajectory guidance but do not eliminate screw malposition. This study reports the operative and clinical performance of a novel process utilising biomodelling and 3D printing to develop patient specific solutions for posterior transarticular atlantoaxial fixation surgery. Software models and 3D printed 1:1 scale biomodels of the patient's bony atlantoaxial spine were developed from computed tomography data for surgical planning. The surgeon collaborated with a local medical device manufacturer using AnatomicsC3D to design patient specific titanium posterior atlantoaxial fixation implants using transarticular and posterior C1 arch screws. Software enabled the surgeon to specify screw trajectories, screw sizes, and simulate corrected atlantoaxial alignment allowing patient specific stereotactic drill guides and titanium posterior fixation implants to be manufactured using 3D printing. Three female patients with unilateral atlantoaxial osteoarthritis were treated using patient specific implants. Transarticular screws were placed using a percutaneous technique with fluoroscopy and neural monitoring. No screw malposition and no neural or vascular injuries were observed. Average operating and fluoroscopy times were 126.0 ± 4.1 min and 36.7 ± 11.5 s respectively. Blood loss was <50 ml per patient and length of stay was 4-6 days. Clinical and radiographic follow up data indicate satisfactory outcomes in all patients. This study demonstrates a safe, accurate, efficient, and relatively inexpensive process to stabilise the atlantoaxial spine using transarticular screws.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; Atlantoaxial joint; Biomodelling; Patient specific; Spinal fusion; Stereotaxy; Transarticular

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30017594     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  6 in total

Review 1.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  The Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Anatomy for Medical Sciences: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Nilmini Wickramasinghe; Bruce R Thompson; Junhua Xiao
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 3.  Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Meng Meng; Jinzuo Wang; Tianze Sun; Wentao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Liming Shu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.889

4.  Application of Image-Fusion 3D Printing Model in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Malignant Tumors.

Authors:  Yushan Wang; Yi Xiang; Qiaoqiao Tian; Wei Luo; Hao Fan; Peng Ren; Zhi Lv; Jia Lv; Junjun Bai; Xiaochen Qiao; Yi Feng
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.822

5.  Pedicle screw placement in spinal neurosurgery using a 3D-printed drill guide template: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chengqiang Yu; Yufu Ou; Chengxin Xie; Yu Zhang; Jianxun Wei; Xiaoping Mu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Patient-specific implants for craniomaxillofacial surgery: A manufacturer's experience.

Authors:  Ganesha K Thayaparan; Philip M Lewis; Robert G Thompson; Paul S D'Urso
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.